Bram Van Dam wrote > On 09/29/2013 04:03 PM, adfel70 wrote: > If you're doing real time on a 5TB index then you'll probably want to > throw your money at the fastest storage you can afford (SSDs vs spinning > rust made a huge difference in our benchmarks) and the fastest CPUs you > can get your hands on. Memory is important too, but in our benchmarks > that didn't have as much impact as the other factors. Keeping a 5TB > index in memory is going to be tricky, so in my opinion you'd be better > off investing in faster disks instead.
Can you please elaborate on your benchmarks? what was the cluster size, which hardware (CPUs, RAM size, disk type...) and so on? This info might really help us. Also, if I understand you correctly, from certain index size, the impact of RAM size is less important than disk performance? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Maximum-solr-processes-per-machine-tp4092568p4092651.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
