ent-13035647>
You can vote on the issue to communicate your interest.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Mark [mailto:static.void@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: K-Stemmer for Solr 3.1
Where can one find the KStemmer source for 4
;
You can vote on the issue to communicate your interest.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark [mailto:static.void@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:31 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: K-Stemmer for Solr 3.1
>
> Where can one find th
Where can one find the KStemmer source for 4.0?
On 5/12/11 11:28 PM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
I backported a Lucid KStemmer version from solr 4.0 which I found
somewhere.
Just changed from
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.CharArraySet; // solr4.0
to
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.CharArra
Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Otis Gospodnetic
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wed, May 18, 2011 11:35:32 PM
Subject: Re: K-Stemmer for Solr 3.1
I see KStem being mentioned lately. It's been 5+ years since I looked at the
ginal Message
> From: Otis Gospodnetic
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, May 18, 2011 11:35:32 PM
> Subject: Re: K-Stemmer for Solr 3.1
>
> I see KStem being mentioned lately. It's been 5+ years since I looked at
> the
> original KStem stuff, but I
: "Smiley, David W."
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Sent: Mon, May 16, 2011 5:33:00 PM
> Subject: Re: K-Stemmer for Solr 3.1
>
> Lucid's KStemmer is LGPL and the Solr committers have shown that they don't
>want LGPL libraries shipping wi
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Smiley, David W. wrote:
> Lucid's KStemmer is LGPL and the Solr committers have shown that they don't
> want LGPL libraries shipping with Solr. If you are intent on releasing your
> changes, I suggest attaching both the modified source and the compiled jar
> ont
On 5/16/2011 at 5:33 PM, David W. Smiley wrote:
> Lucid's KStemmer is LGPL and the Solr committers have shown that they
> don't want LGPL libraries shipping with Solr. If you are intent on
> releasing your changes, I suggest attaching both the modified source and
> the compiled jar onto Solr's k-st
Lucid's KStemmer is LGPL and the Solr committers have shown that they don't
want LGPL libraries shipping with Solr. If you are intent on releasing your
changes, I suggest attaching both the modified source and the compiled jar onto
Solr's k-stemmer wiki page; and of course say that it's LGPL lic
I don't know if it is allowed to modify Lucid code and add it to jira.
If someone from Lucid would give me the permission and the Solr developers
have nothing against it I won't mind adding the Lucid KStemmer to jira
for Solr 3.x and 4.x.
There are several Lucid KStemmer users which I can see fro
Did you upload the code to Jira?
On 5/13/11 12:28 AM, "Bernd Fehling"
wrote:
>I backported a Lucid KStemmer version from solr 4.0 which I found
>somewhere.
>Just changed from
>import org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.CharArraySet; // solr4.0
>to
>import org.apache.lucene.analysis.CharArraySet; /
I backported a Lucid KStemmer version from solr 4.0 which I found somewhere.
Just changed from
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.CharArraySet; // solr4.0
to
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.CharArraySet; // solr3.1
Bernd
Am 12.05.2011 16:32, schrieb Mark:
java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.TokenStream.incrementToken()Z
Would you mind explaining your modifications? Thanks
On 5/11/11 11:14 PM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
Am 12.05.2011 02:05, schrieb Mark:
It appears that the older version of the Lucid Works KStemmer is
incompati
Am 12.05.2011 02:05, schrieb Mark:
It appears that the older version of the Lucid Works KStemmer is incompatible
with Solr 3.1. Has anyone been able to get this to work? If not,
what are you using as an alternative?
Thanks
Lucid KStemmer works nice with Solr3.1 after some minor mods to
KStem
14 matches
Mail list logo
