Hi Otis,
conclusion, if we check that the license agreement is included in all
source files and as a seperate license file then we are clear about
KStem itself.
What about the modifications from Lucid, do you know if they publish under GPL?
Bernd
-----
BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
http://www.base-search.net/
Am 19.05.2011 05:39, schrieb Otis Gospodnetic:
Hm, maybe I was wrong. I don't see any mention of *GPL on KStem download page.
I only see http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/downloads/agreements/general.html.
Otis
----
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
----- Original Message ----
From: Otis Gospodnetic<otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wed, May 18, 2011 11:35:32 PM
Subject: Re: K-Stemmer for Solr 3.1
I see KStem being mentioned lately. It's been 5+ years since I looked at the
original KStem stuff, but I recall there being a license issue with the
*original* KStem. I think it was under some flavour of GPL and that was the
reason why we didn't include it in Lucene/Solr back then. I say this now
because I saw people said KStem was released under BSD license, which doesn't
match what I saw 5+ years ago.
Otis
----
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
----- Original Message ----
From: "Smiley, David W."<dsmi...@mitre.org>
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"<solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
Sent: Mon, May 16, 2011 5:33:00 PM
Subject: Re: K-Stemmer for Solr 3.1
Lucid's KStemmer is LGPL and the Solr committers have shown that they don't
want LGPL libraries shipping with Solr. If you are intent on releasing your
changes, I suggest attaching both the modified source and the compiled jar
onto
Solr's k-stemmer wiki page; and of course say that it's LGPL licensed.
~ David Smiley
On May 16, 2011, at 2:24 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
I don't know if it is allowed to modify Lucid code and add it to jira.
If someone from Lucid would give me the permission and the Solr
developers
have nothing against it I won't mind adding the Lucid KStemmer to jira
for Solr 3.x and 4.x.
There are several Lucid KStemmer users which I can see from the many
requests
which I got. Also the Lucid KStemmer is faster than the standard
KStemmer.
>
Bernd
Am 16.05.2011 06:33, schrieb Bill Bell:
Did you upload the code to Jira?
>>
On 5/13/11 12:28 AM, "Bernd Fehling"<bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de>
>> wrote:
I backported a Lucid KStemmer version from solr 4.0 which I found
somewhere.
Just changed from
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.CharArraySet; // solr4.0
>>> to
import org.apache.lucene.analysis.CharArraySet; // solr3.1
Bernd
>>> Am 12.05.2011 16:32, schrieb Mark:
>>>> java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
>>>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.TokenStream.incrementToken()Z
>>>>
Would you mind explaining your modifications? Thanks
On 5/11/11 11:14 PM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
Am 12.05.2011 02:05, schrieb Mark:
>>>>>> It appears that the older version of the Lucid Works KStemmer is
incompatible with Solr 3.1. Has anyone been able to get this to
work?
>>>>>> If not,
what are you using as an alternative?
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Lucid KStemmer works nice with Solr3.1 after some minor mods to
KStemFilter.java and KStemFilterFactory.java.
What problems do you have?
Bernd
>>
--
*************************************************************
Bernd Fehling Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Universitätsstr. 25
Tel. +49 521 106-4060 Fax. +49 521 106-4052
> bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de 33615 Bielefeld
BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine - www.base-search.net
*************************************************************
--
*************************************************************
Bernd Fehling Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Universitätsstr. 25
Tel. +49 521 106-4060 Fax. +49 521 106-4052
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de 33615 Bielefeld
BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine - www.base-search.net
*************************************************************
