On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 10:03 +0530, Roopesh P Raj wrote:
DISCLAIMER:
Please, I am subscribed to the user list and there is no need to write
me directly nor cc me in your response. More since we are an open source
project off-list communication is suboptimal and harmful to the
community. The communi
Thanks a lot for your replies. I will follow the paginated search.
Thanks and Regards
Roopesh
--
DigitalGlue, India
By design, it's not very efficient to ask for a large number of
results with solr/lucene. I think you will face performance and memory
problems if you do that.
On 9/24/07, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 16:29 +0530, Roopesh P Raj wrote:
> > > Hi Roopesh,
> >
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 16:29 +0530, Roopesh P Raj wrote:
> > Hi Roopesh,
>
> > I am not sure whether I understand your problem.
>
> > Is it the limitation of rows/pagination?
> > If so why not using a real high number (like rows=100)?
>
> > salu2
>
> Hi,
>
> Assigning a high number wi
Hi Roopesh,
I am not sure whether I understand your problem.
Is it the limitation of rows/pagination?
If so why not using a real high number (like rows=100)?
salu2
Hi,
Assigning a high number will solve my problem. (I thought that there will
something like rows='all' to do it)
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:34 +0530, Roopesh P Raj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using solr setup in Tomcat 5.5 with python 2.4 using python client
> solr.py.
>
> When I search, all the results are not returned.
>
> The method call for searching is as follows : rows specifies the number of
> rows.
> d
