By design, it's not very efficient to ask for a large number of results with solr/lucene. I think you will face performance and memory problems if you do that.
On 9/24/07, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 16:29 +0530, Roopesh P Raj wrote: > > > Hi Roopesh, > > > > > I am not sure whether I understand your problem. > > > > > Is it the limitation of rows/pagination? > > > If so why not using a real high number (like rows=10000000000)? > > > > > salu2 > > > > Hi, > > > > Assigning a high number will solve my problem. (I thought that there will > > something like rows='all' to do it). > > > > Can I do pagination using the python client? > > I am not a python expert but I think so. > > > How can I specify the starting position, offset etc for > > pagination through the python client? > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters > > It should work as described in the above document (with the start > parameter. > > e.g. > data = c.search(q='query', fl='id score unique_id Message-ID To From > Subject',rows=50, wt='python',start=50) > > HTH > -- > Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org > Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions > > -- Jerome Eteve. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jerome.eteve.free.fr/
