If you need to do an inner purely negative clause, it must be OR’d with *:* -
queries about matching not excluding. There’s a shortcut in Solr to allow a
top-level purely negative clause as convenience but when it gets nested it
needs pairing explicitly.
Those queries below don’t quite do what
Too many ‘+’’s in there, I think.
I think the query you want is this, and let’s be precise about the query parser
here too in case that’s getting in the way and split this stuff up into
separate reusable clauses:
?qq=test
&q_no_type=({!field f=name v=$qq} -type:*)
&q_research=({!f
@Alexandre Rafalovitch,
I could define empty string => "" as default value but than I do facet on
that field too. I will need to filter empty strings from facet generation
logic. By the way, which one is faster:
either defining empty string as default value and appending (OR type:"") to
queries
o
On the other hand, that query does not do what I want.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> Btw, what is the difference between
>
> +name:test +(type:research (*:* -type:[* TO *]))
>
> and
>
> +name:test +(type:research -type:[* TO *])
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Furk
Btw, what is the difference between
+name:test +(type:research (*:* -type:[* TO *]))
and
+name:test +(type:research -type:[* TO *])
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> Actually, amount of documents which have 'type' field is relatively too
> small across all documents at i
Actually, amount of documents which have 'type' field is relatively too
small across all documents at index.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> What about setting a default value for the field? That is probably
> faster than negative search clauses?
>
> Regards,
>
What about setting a default value for the field? That is probably
faster than negative search clauses?
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 16 April 2017 at 23:58, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> +name:test +(type:research (*:* -type:[*
+name:test +(type:research (*:* -type:[* TO *]))
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a schema like:
>
> name,
> department,
> type
>
> type is an optional field. Some documents don't have that field. Let's
> assume I have these:
>
> Doc 1:
> name: test
> type:
