Actually, amount of documents which have 'type' field is relatively too small across all documents at index.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote: > What about setting a default value for the field? That is probably > faster than negative search clauses? > > Regards, > Alex. > ---- > http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced > > > On 16 April 2017 at 23:58, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > +name:test +(type:research (*:* -type:[* TO *])) > > > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have a schema like: > >> > >> name, > >> department, > >> type > >> > >> type is an optional field. Some documents don't have that field. Let's > >> assume I have these: > >> > >> Doc 1: > >> name: test > >> type: research > >> > >> Doc 2: > >> name: test > >> type: developer > >> > >> Doc 3: > >> name: test > >> > >> I want to search name: test and type:research if type field exists > (result > >> will be Doc 1 and Doc 3). > >> > >> How can I do that? > >> > >> Kind Regards, > >> Furkan KAMACI > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours > > Mikhail Khludnev >