I'll be happy to commit it if someone fixes the current problems with it.
Best,
Erick
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> Looking forward for this to be solved.
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
>
> On 7 March 2016 at 07:41, William Bell wrote:
>
>> Can we get this
Thank you.
Looking forward for this to be solved.
Regards,
Edwin
On 7 March 2016 at 07:41, William Bell wrote:
> Can we get this over the goal line?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > No, I tr
Can we get this over the goal line?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No, I tried that and I got the following error.
>
> {
> "responseHeader":{
> "status":500,
> "QTime":0},
> "error":{
> "msg":"
I don't believe that was ever supported. But Scott and I have been working
through SOLR-3191 recently to get that need addressed. Maybe some time next
week we will have a ready to commit patch up.
Erik
> On Mar 5, 2016, at 22:19, William Bell wrote:
>
> it used to support
>
> fl=*,-fie
Hi,
No, I tried that and I got the following error.
{
"responseHeader":{
"status":500,
"QTime":0},
"error":{
"msg":"For input string: \"-\"",
"trace":"java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string:
\"-\"\r\n\tat
java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatE
it used to support
fl=*,-field
Does that not work now?
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> I have yet to find any workaround so far.Still have to list out all the
> remaining fields one by one.
>
> Does anyone else has any suggestions?
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
>
> On 18
I have yet to find any workaround so far.Still have to list out all the
remaining fields one by one.
Does anyone else has any suggestions?
Regards,
Edwin
On 18 February 2016 at 17:07, Anil wrote:
> I am looking for the same. please do let me know just in case you find
> workaround.
>
> On 18
I am looking for the same. please do let me know just in case you find
workaround.
On 18 February 2016 at 14:18, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would like to find out, is there already a way to exclude field from the
> Solr response. I did came across SOLR-3191 which was created about 4 ye
