port lots of Lucene
stuff to 5. I would sure like to see some numbers from any of you :)
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Anshum Gupta
> Sent: Friday 13th March 2015 23:33
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Distributed IDF performance
>
> np!
>
&g
np!
I forgot to mention that I didn't notice any considerable performance hit
in my tests. The QTimes were barely off by 5%.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> Oops... I said "StatsInfo" and that should have been "StatsCache"
> ("").
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Fri, Mar 1
Oops... I said "StatsInfo" and that should have been "StatsCache"
("").
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> There's no rough formula or performance data that I know of at this point.
> About he guidance, if you want to use Global stats, my obvious choice wou
There's no rough formula or performance data that I know of at this point.
About he guidance, if you want to use Global stats, my obvious choice would
be to use the LRUStatsCache.
Before committing, I did run some tests on my macbook but as I said back
then, they shouldn't be totally taken at face
