np!
I forgot to mention that I didn't notice any considerable performance hit
in my tests. The QTimes were barely off by 5%.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Jack Krupansky <jack.krupan...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Oops... I said "StatsInfo" and that should have been "StatsCache"
> ("<statsCache .../>").
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
> > There's no rough formula or performance data that I know of at this
> point.
> > About he guidance, if you want to use Global stats, my obvious choice
> would
> > be to use the LRUStatsCache.
> > Before committing, I did run some tests on my macbook but as I said back
> > then, they shouldn't be totally taken at face value. The tests didn't
> > involve any network and were just about 20mn docs and synthetic queries.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Jack Krupansky <
> jack.krupan...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Does anybody have any actual performance data or even a rough formula
> for
> > > calculating the overhead for using the new Solr 5.0 Distributed IDF (
> > > SOLR-1632 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1632>)?
> > >
> > > And any guidance as far as which StatsInfo plugin is best to use?
> > >
> > > Are many people now using Distributed IDF as their default?
> > >
> > > I'm not currently using this, but the existing doc and Jira is too
> > minimal
> > > to offer guidance as requested above. Mostly I'm just curious.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > -- Jack Krupansky
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
> >
>
--
Anshum Gupta
