Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index

2013-09-13 Thread Jack Krupansky
ome from. Do you have any specific reason to believe that one of the counts is more right than the other? -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Kuchekar Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:50 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Stefan Matheis Subject: Re: Different Respo

Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index

2013-09-13 Thread Kuchekar
ation requested in my previous response. > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Kuchekar > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 1:46 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index > > Hi, >

Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index

2013-09-13 Thread Kuchekar
Message- From: Kuchekar > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:50 PM > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Cc: Stefan Matheis > Subject: Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index > > Hi, > > After triaging more for this, we find that the termFrequency (tf)

Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index

2013-09-13 Thread Jack Krupansky
ginal Message- From: Kuchekar Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:50 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Stefan Matheis Subject: Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index Hi, After triaging more for this, we find that the termFrequency (tf) for the same field in the same d

Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index

2013-09-13 Thread Kuchekar
Hi, After triaging more for this, we find that the termFrequency (tf) for the same field in the same doc in solr 3.5 and 4.4 is different. example : If word "fruits" appear in some field for 20 times In 3.5 tf is reported to be 8, where as in 4.4 solr it reports to be 20. that is changing

Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index

2013-09-12 Thread Kuchekar
Hi, Any updates on this?. Is ranking computation dependent on the 'maxDoc' value in the solr? Is this happening due to changing value of 'maxDoc' value after each optimization. As in, in solr 4.4 every time optimization is ran, the 'maxDoc' value is reset, where as this is not the case in solr

Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index

2013-08-28 Thread Michael Sokolov
We've been seeing changes in our rankings as well. I don't have a definite answer yet, since we're waiting on an index rebuild, but our current working theory is that the change to default omitNorms="true" for primitive types may have had an effect, possibly due to follow on confusion: our dev

Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index

2013-08-26 Thread Stefan Matheis
Did you check the scoring? (use fl=*,score to retrieve it) .. additionally debugQuery=true might provide more information about how the score was calculated. - Stefan On Monday, August 26, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Kuchekar wrote: > Hi, > The response from 4.4 and 3.5 in the current scenario differs

Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index

2013-08-25 Thread Kuchekar
Hi, The response from 4.4 and 3.5 in the current scenario differs in the sequence in which results are given us back. For example : Response from 3.5 solr is : id:A, id:B, id:C, id:D ... Response from 4.4 solr is : id C, id:A, id:D, id:B... Looking forward your reply. Thanks. Kuchekar, Ni

Re: Different Responses for 4.4 and 3.5 solr index

2013-08-25 Thread Stefan Matheis
Kuchekar (hope that's your first name?) you didn't tell us .. how they differ? do you get an actual error? or does the result contain documents you didn't expect? or the other way round, that some are missing you'd expect to be there? - Stefan On Sunday, August 25, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Kuchekar