We've been seeing changes in our rankings as well. I don't have a
definite answer yet, since we're waiting on an index rebuild, but our
current working theory is that the change to default omitNorms="true"
for primitive types may have had an effect, possibly due to follow on
confusion: our developers may have omitted norms from some other fields
they shouldn't have?
-Mike
On 08/26/2013 09:46 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote:
Did you check the scoring? (use fl=*,score to retrieve it) .. additionally
debugQuery=true might provide more information about how the score was
calculated.
- Stefan
On Monday, August 26, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Kuchekar wrote:
Hi,
The response from 4.4 and 3.5 in the current scenario differs in the
sequence in which results are given us back.
For example :
Response from 3.5 solr is : id:A, id:B, id:C, id:D ...
Response from 4.4 solr is : id C, id:A, id:D, id:B...
Looking forward your reply.
Thanks.
Kuchekar, Nilesh
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Matheis
<matheis.ste...@gmail.com (mailto:matheis.ste...@gmail.com)>wrote:
Kuchekar (hope that's your first name?)
you didn't tell us .. how they differ? do you get an actual error? or does
the result contain documents you didn't expect? or the other way round,
that some are missing you'd expect to be there?
- Stefan
On Sunday, August 25, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Kuchekar wrote:
Hi,
We get different response when we query 4.4 and 3.5 solr using same
query params.
My query param are as following :
facet=true
&facet.mincount=1
&facet.limit=25
&qf=content^0.0+p_last_name^500.0+p_first_name^50.0+strong_topic^0.0+first_author_topic^0.0+last_author_topic^0.0+title_topic^0.0
&wt=javabin
&version=2
&rows=10
&f.affiliation_org.facet.limit=150
&fl=p_id,p_first_name,p_last_name
&start=0
&q=Apple
&facet.field=affiliation_org
&fq=table:profile
&fq=num_content:[*+TO+1500]
&fq=name:"Apple"
The content in both (solr 4.4 and solr 3.5) are same.
The solrconfig.xml from 3.5 an 4.4 are similarly constructed.
Is there something I am missing that might have been changed in 4.4,
which
might be causing this issue. ?. The "qf" params looks same.
Looking forward for your reply.
Thanks.
Kuchekar, Nilesh
