On Oct 25, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Fair enough, I guess I was just kind of expecting a constant score
query + a
: function query to result in a score of whatever the function query
is. This
: is a common trick to sort by a function, but it's easy enough to
just ^0 the
: Fair enough, I guess I was just kind of expecting a constant score query + a
: function query to result in a score of whatever the function query is. This
: is a common trick to sort by a function, but it's easy enough to just ^0 the
: non function clause.
I think the root of hte issue is that
On Oct 22, 2009, at 9:44 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: > Why wouldn't you just query the function directly and leave out
the *:* ?
:
: *:* was just a quick example, I might have other constant score
queries, but I
: guess I probably could do a filter query plus the function query,
too.
: > Why wouldn't you just query the function directly and leave out the *:* ?
:
: *:* was just a quick example, I might have other constant score queries, but I
: guess I probably could do a filter query plus the function query, too.
I guess i don't udnerstand what your point was ... you mention
On Oct 22, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: As a workaround, I can do: *:*^0 _val_:price_f, which gets rid of
the query
: norm factor.
:
: I realize I could override the similarity or use the workaround,
but I was
: just curious about what other people think of this.
Why wouldn'
: As a workaround, I can do: *:*^0 _val_:price_f, which gets rid of the query
: norm factor.
:
: I realize I could override the similarity or use the workaround, but I was
: just curious about what other people think of this.
Why wouldn't you just query the function directly and leave out the *:*
