: > Why wouldn't you just query the function directly and leave out the *:* ? : : *:* was just a quick example, I might have other constant score queries, but I : guess I probably could do a filter query plus the function query, too.
I guess i don't udnerstand what your point was ... you mentioned that using a function query with *:* didn't produce scores that equal to the function output, but that's just the nature of how a BooleanQuery works, it aggregates the clauses. if you *want* the scores to be a factor of both clauses, then use a booleanQuery, if you have a clause that you don't want factoring into the query, use "fq" -Hoss
