There has been modification in field types. I would suggest you need to
compare two schema and then may be you have to reindex it. Other than that
latest version has light footprint so it should be the case.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:05 PM kshitij tyagi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any suggestions from anyo
Hi,
Any suggestions from anyone?
Regards,
kshitij
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:11 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Please don’t cross-post, this discussion belongs in solr-user only.
>
> Jan
>
> > 14. jan. 2020 kl. 22:22 skrev kshitij tyagi >:
> >
> > Also trie fileds have been updated to point fields, w
Please don’t cross-post, this discussion belongs in solr-user only.
Jan
> 14. jan. 2020 kl. 22:22 skrev kshitij tyagi :
>
> Also trie fileds have been updated to point fields, will that by any chance
> degrade my response time by 50 percent?
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM kshitij tyagi
>
Also trie fileds have been updated to point fields, will that by any chance
degrade my response time by 50 percent?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM kshitij tyagi
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am currently upgrading my system from solr 6.6 to solr 8.2 :
>
> 1. I am observing increased search time in m
On 4/17/2019 3:52 AM, Ritesh Kumar wrote:
Field type in old configuration - string (solr.StrField) indexed and
stored set to true.
Field type in new configuration - solr.SortableTextField (docValues enabled)
On your schema, you have changed the field class -- from StrField to
SortableTextFie
On 7/25/2018 10:38 AM, Staley, Phil R - DCF wrote:
> What are the steps for upgrading a non-clustered SOLR version? Here's what I
> thought should work:
That depends on how you did the initial install.
If you used the service installer script that's included with Solr to do
the initial install:
Christopher,
I'll test it tomorrow and let you know! Thanks again!
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 3:40 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading SOLR (not clustered)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: S
;8983"
I would expect your process to work. Did it?
- -chris
> -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 3:23
> PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Upgrading SOLR (not
> clustered)
>
> Phil,
>
> On 7/25/18 12:
HOME="/var/solr/data"
LOG4J_PROPS="/var/solr/log4j.properties"
SOLR_LOGS_DIR="/var/solr/logs"
SOLR_PORT="8983"
Thanks,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 3:23 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Phil,
On 7/25/18 12:38 PM, Staley, Phil R - DCF wrote:
> What are the steps for upgrading a non-clustered SOLR version?
> Here's what I thought should work:
>
>
>
> 1. Open a bash window and ssh login to desired server with
> your Linux admi
On 2/28/2017 8:45 AM, skasab2s wrote:
> we are trying to upgrade solr 5.2 to solr 5.5.
>
> In solr 5.2 we had an own, customised version of solr.war and we put it
> under
>
> solr-5.2.1/server/webapps/ (we overwrote the default solr.war),
>
> so on the solr startup, the war was extracted to
>
>
Thank you very much for your prompt response.
I really appreciate it!
Rachid
On Jul 12, 2016 17:13, "Shawn Heisey" wrote:
> On 7/12/2016 5:54 PM, Rachid Bouacheria wrote:
> > I am running solr 4.10.4 and I would like to upgrade to the latest
> version
> > 6.1.0
> >
> > The documentation I found p
On 7/12/2016 5:54 PM, Rachid Bouacheria wrote:
> I am running solr 4.10.4 and I would like to upgrade to the latest version
> 6.1.0
>
> The documentation I found provides steps to upgrade from 4.10.4 to 5.x
> And it seems like going from 4.x to 5.x is pretty consequent.
> Going from 5.x to 6.1.0 se
On 2/10/2015 2:29 PM, Elan Palani wrote:
> Planning to Upgrade solr from 4.7.2 to 4.10.3 , I just want through the
> Documentation
> seems like a straight forward download/install..
>
> Anything specifically issues I should look for?
Chances are that replacing the war and any extra jars you're u
Well, the CHANGES.txt is filled with just the right information you need :)
-Original message-
> From:Elan Palani
> Sent: Tuesday 10th February 2015 22:30
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Upgrading Solr 4.7.2 to 4.10.3
>
> Team..
>
> Planning to Upgrade solr from 4.7.2 to
On 11/28/2014 2:44 AM, rajadilipchowdary.ko...@cognizant.com wrote:
> We are using Apache Solr 1.4.1 for our project. Now a days we are facing many
> problems regarding solr indexing, so when we saw website we found latest
> version is 4.10, could you please help us in Upgrading the Solr.
>
> Is
P.S. Do _NOT_ just copy your 1.4 configs to 4.x. Start
with the 4x sample configs and selectively move any
customizations from 1.4 or you'll get burned
by things like schema requiring _version_ in 4.x and
possibly _root_ etc.
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 2:53 AM, David Philip
wrote:
> Hi
Hi Raja,
Could you please mention the list of solr features that you were/are
using in Solr 1.4. There have been tremendous changes since 1.4 to 4.10.
Also, you may have to explore solr cloud for resolving the indexing
operation. But what kind of indexing problems are you facing?
You should loo
Thanks Shawn, will try and it out without re-indexing and see how that goes.
Nitin
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/23/2014 8:40 AM, Nitin Agarwal wrote:
> > Hi, we are planning for a Solr Cloud upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.10. I have
> > identified the following steps for
On 9/23/2014 8:40 AM, Nitin Agarwal wrote:
> Hi, we are planning for a Solr Cloud upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.10. I have
> identified the following steps for the upgrade
>
> 1. Update solrconfig.xml to be compliant with 4.10.
> 2. Update the required jar files and war files from Solr 4.10 distribution.
We have been doing exactly that through several versions of Solr: we unpack the
new version on one set of replicas, install empty directories for the core(s)
we want to use, and create empty core.properties files in these. Then, we start
the new replicas, using a (stand-alone) zookeeper for the
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I.e. just do if(!acceptDocs.get(doc)) return false; at
> the top?
Yep, that should do it.
-Yonik
lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference.
Boston May 7-10
I am assuming you meant should not be returned right? I basically
return a filtered doc id set and do the following
return new FilteredDocIdSet(startingFilter.getDocIdSet(readerCtx, acceptDocs)) {
@Override
public boolean match(int doc) {
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade an application I have from an old snapshot of
> solr to the latest stable trunk and see that the constructor for
> Filter has changed, specifically there is another parameter named
> acceptDocs, the API says the followin
Thanks Erick.
On 19 September 2011 15:10, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Reindexing is not necessary. Drop in 3.4 and go.
>
> For this sort of scenario, it's easy enough to try using a copy of your
> directory with an instance of the newest release of Solr. If
> the release notes don't say a reindex
Reindexing is not necessary. Drop in 3.4 and go.
For this sort of scenario, it's easy enough to try using a copy of your
directory with an instance of the newest release of Solr. If the
release notes don't say a reindex is necessary, then it's not, but always a
good idea to try it and run
Hi ,
Ya we need to upgrade but my question is whether reindexing of all cores is
required
or
we can directly use already indexed data folders of solr 3.3 to solr 3.4.
Thanks,
Isan Fulia.
On 19 September 2011 11:03, Wyhw Whon wrote:
> If you are already using Apache Lucene 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3,
If you are already using Apache Lucene 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3, we strongly
recommend you upgrade to 3.4.0 because of the index corruption bug on
OS or computer crash or power loss (LUCENE-3418), now fixed in 3.4.0.
2011/9/19 Isan Fulia
> Hi all,
>
> Does upgrading solr from 3.3 to 3.4 requires reindexi
Thanks Edorado. I will try installing manually.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Upgrading-solr-from-1-4-to-latest-version-tp3164312p3169768.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I think that at the moment there isn't any Ubuntu package available with
solr 3.x
My suggestion is to uninstall it (via apt-get) and "install" solr manually
in your /opt or wherever you want
After all what you have to do is easily extract the zipped archive.
Edo
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:35 AM,
thanks for your quick response..
yes it was under the right path... However, the problem was fixed by changing
the ownership under index folder :)
thanks again
ak
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: upgra
solr/admin/stats.jsp and no
indexed files were detected !
Either I'm doing it wrong or I have missed something !
thanks for your time
ak
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: upgrading solr
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:29
rg
> Subject: Re: upgrading solr
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:29:33 -0400
>
> I've upgraded solr several times from nightly to nightly and then to
> the 1.3 release without reindexing, with no apparent ill effects.
>
> On Oct 8, 2008, at 6:12 AM, dudes dudes wrote:
>
&
thanks, I will give it a try ,,, any probs will let you know :)
ak
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: upgrading solr
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:29:33 -0400
>
> I've upgraded solr severa
I've upgraded solr several times from nightly to nightly and then to
the 1.3 release without reindexing, with no apparent ill effects.
On Oct 8, 2008, at 6:12 AM, dudes dudes wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to upgrade to the latest Solr from its nightly version.
MY understanding is to re-in
35 matches
Mail list logo
