Thanks Erick.
On 19 September 2011 15:10, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Reindexing is not necessary. Drop in 3.4 and go. > > For this sort of scenario, it's easy enough to try using a copy of your > <SOLR_HOME> directory with an instance of the newest release of Solr. If > the release notes don't say a reindex is necessary, then it's not, but > always a good idea to try it and run any tests you have handy. > > Erik > > > > On Sep 19, 2011, at 00:02 , Isan Fulia wrote: > > > Hi , > > > > Ya we need to upgrade but my question is whether reindexing of all cores > is > > required > > or > > we can directly use already indexed data folders of solr 3.3 to solr 3.4. > > > > Thanks, > > Isan Fulia. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 19 September 2011 11:03, Wyhw Whon <w...@microgle.com> wrote: > > > >> If you are already using Apache Lucene 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3, we strongly > >> recommend you upgrade to 3.4.0 because of the index corruption bug on > >> OS or computer crash or power loss (LUCENE-3418), now fixed in 3.4.0. > >> > >> 2011/9/19 Isan Fulia <isan.fu...@germinait.com> > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Does upgrading solr from 3.3 to 3.4 requires reindexing of all the > cores > >> or > >>> we can directly copy the data folders to > >>> the new solr ? > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Thanks & Regards, > >>> Isan Fulia. > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Isan Fulia. > > -- Thanks & Regards, Isan Fulia.
