Re: multiple slaves on the same box

2007-07-17 Thread James liu
2007/7/18, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Xuesong Luo wrote: > Hi, there, > We have one master server and multiple slave servers. The multiple slave > servers can be run either on the same box or different boxes. For > slaves on the same box, is there any best practice that they should use

RE: multiple slaves on the same box

2007-07-17 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Thanks for sharing your experience. We have multiple slaves for load : balance (performance reason) and failover(in case one server dies or : hung). if your goal is reliability and performacne, i can't really think of many reasons why it would make senseto run multiple slaves of the same master

RE: multiple slaves on the same box

2007-07-17 Thread Xuesong Luo
@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: multiple slaves on the same box Xuesong Luo wrote: > Hi, there, > We have one master server and multiple slave servers. The multiple slave > servers can be run either on the same box or different boxes. For > slaves on the same box, is there any best practice that

Re: multiple slaves on the same box

2007-07-17 Thread Ryan McKinley
Xuesong Luo wrote: Hi, there, We have one master server and multiple slave servers. The multiple slave servers can be run either on the same box or different boxes. For slaves on the same box, is there any best practice that they should use the same index or each should have separate indexes?