2007/7/18, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Xuesong Luo wrote: > Hi, there, > We have one master server and multiple slave servers. The multiple slave > servers can be run either on the same box or different boxes. For > slaves on the same box, is there any best practice that they should use > the same index or each should have separate indexes? > I'm not sure about 'best' practices, but I can tell you my experience... We have a master and single slave on the same server using the same index. Since it is the same index, there really is no 'distribution' scripts, only something that periodically calls 'commit' on the slave index. This is working great.
I don't know why "We have a master and single slave on the same server using the same index." master which do index? or do other thing? search will use slave or master, or first master and second to slave? My experience: every paritition have their index, and index not same. Master Index do backup and it in other server. I can't think of any reason to have more then one slave server on the
same machine. What are you trying to do? ryan
-- regards jl
