Highlighter requires indexing for sure) and
> it used only indexed fields, but I'll retry.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:34 AM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: limit stored field size
>
t: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:34 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: limit stored field size
I'm not getting through. You do _not_ need to have a field indexed to highlight.
They can (optionally) just be stored and re-analyzed just before being returned.
Especially with 50 character fields to be high
I'm not getting through. You do _not_ need to have a field indexed to highlight.
They can (optionally) just be stored and re-analyzed just before being returned.
Especially with 50 character fields to be highlighted, the re-analysis won't be
very expensive.
So it's perfectly reasonable to index b
Thanks Erick.
As far as I understand (during highlight debugging) a field must have
indexed=true in order to be highlighted, so the truncated field should be
indexed and stored. I would like to avoid the double indexed fields.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/
Do you need to store the entire field or just the first part for highlighting?
If the latter, then define the field you search as
indexed="true" stored="false"
and the field you want to highlight (truncated) as
indexed="false" stored="true".
True that defines one extra field but the cost of one
Thanks Alex,
This processor truncates the fields during index (I just checked it), but I
need a different thing.
Let's say I have a content of 100 characters. I want whole of this field to
be indexed, but I want to store only the first 50 characters, which I will
use for highlighting.
i.e: conten
http://www.solr-start.com/javadoc/solr-lucene/org/apache/solr/update/processor/TruncateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory.html
Regards,
Alex.
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 26 June 2016 at 15:09, asteiner wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a fi
