I'm not getting through. You do _not_ need to have a field indexed to highlight. They can (optionally) just be stored and re-analyzed just before being returned.
Especially with 50 character fields to be highlighted, the re-analysis won't be very expensive. So it's perfectly reasonable to index but not store your searchable field and store but not index your highlight part. Best, Erick On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:29 PM, asteiner <astei...@varonis.com> wrote: > Thanks Erick. > As far as I understand (during highlight debugging) a field must have > indexed=true in order to be highlighted, so the truncated field should be > indexed and stored. I would like to avoid the double indexed fields. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/limit-stored-field-size-tp4284356p4284427.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
