This appears to be the case. "*" is the only wildcard supported by "fl"
before 4.0.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Josh Harness
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 9:08 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: fl Parameter and Wildcards for Dynamic Fields
I'm using SOLR 3.3
if you wish to search on fields using wild-card you have to use a
copyField to copy all the values of "Bool_*" to another field and
search on that field.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT
SYSTEMS] wrote:
> I use dynamic fields heavily in my SOLR config. I would
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
wrote:
> I use dynamic fields heavily in my SOLR config. I would like to be able to
> specify which fields should be returned from a query based on a pattern for
> the field name. For instance, given:
>
>
: Anyone able to help with the question below?
dealing with "fl" is a delicate dance in Solr right now .. complicated by
both FieldSelector logic and distributed search (where both DocList and
SolrDocumentList objects need to be dealt with).
I looked at this recently and even I can't remembe
1:36 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; yo...@lucidimagination.com
Subject: RE: fl parameter
If I were to add that capability, could I do it simply by registering my own
RequestHandler and subclassing StandarRequestHandler?
Or would I have to add an enhancement to Solr?
-Original Me
: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:22 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: fl parameter
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-SC)[PEROT
SYSTEMS] wrote:
> Since SOLR uses variable fields per record it would be useful to not only be
> able to specify which fields to retur
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-SC)[PEROT
SYSTEMS] wrote:
> Since SOLR uses variable fields per record it would be useful to not only be
> able to specify which fields to return in a query via the fl parameter, but
> to also specify which fields to *not* return in the qu
