2013 06:38:09 -0800
> From: ml-node+s472066n4106382...@n3.nabble.com
> To: giuseppe_fe...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788
>
>
>
> Hi;
>
>
> Yes, I am talking about SOLR-788. There writes 4.1 so it means that it has
>
> fixed at 4.1. O
om
To: giuseppe_fe...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788
Hi;
Yes, I am talking about SOLR-788. There writes 4.1 so it means that it has
fixed at 4.1. On the other hand some patches are applied both for ongoing
versions and trunk. 5.0 is the trunk version of
03:51:04 -0800
> From: ml-node+s472066n4106355...@n3.nabble.com
> To: giuseppe_fe...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788
>
>
>
> Hi;
>
>
> SOLR-4414 has no patch. It's related issue has patches bu it seems fixed
>
> since Solr 4.
nks in advance,
-giuseppe
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 03:51:04 -0800
From: ml-node+s472066n4106355...@n3.nabble.com
To: giuseppe_fe...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788
Hi;
SOLR-4414 has no patch. It's related issue has patches bu it seems fixed
since Sol
Hi;
SOLR-4414 has no patch. It's related issue has patches bu it seems fixed
since Solr 4.1
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2013/12/12 gf80
> Hi guys,
>
> could you kindly help me to apply patch for MoreLikeThis on solrcloud.
> I'm using Solr 4.6 and I'm using solrcloud with 10 shards.
> The problem
Hi guys,
could you kindly help me to apply patch for MoreLikeThis on solrcloud.
I'm using Solr 4.6 and I'm using solrcloud with 10 shards.
The problem is described here
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4414
but I think that it was solved but not already delivered in Solr4.6.
Thanks a
I wouldn't use a random code - follow the pattern of increments.
- Mark
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Luis Cappa Banda wrote:
> Hello, Mark.
>
> I didn´t know if adding that constant (with a random hexadecimal selected
> by me) could affect to other parts of code. In fact some day it existed
Hello, Mark.
I didn´t know if adding that constant (with a random hexadecimal selected
by me) could affect to other parts of code. In fact some day it existed and
currently not, so it may be a reason why that occurred. Also, copy &
pasting a patch that you don´t really understand what´s doing and
Add it?
- Mark
On Nov 27, 2012, at 6:33 AM, Luis Cappa Banda wrote:
> I´ve recently patched Solr 4.0 tag but it exists a conflict
> with PURPOSE_GET_MLT_RESULTS final static attributed in ShardRequest.java.
> The thing is that it doesn´t exist, :-/ Any tips?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> - Luis Cappa.
I´ve recently patched Solr 4.0 tag but it exists a conflict
with PURPOSE_GET_MLT_RESULTS final static attributed in ShardRequest.java.
The thing is that it doesn´t exist, :-/ Any tips?
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/27 Luis Cappa Banda
> Hello, guys.
>
> Does anyone tested the latest
> SOL
10 matches
Mail list logo
