RE: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-13 Thread Sven Maurmann
om] Sent: quarta-feira, 13 de Janeiro de 2010 17:20 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Problem comitting on 40GB index Just curious, have you checked if the hanging you are experiencing is not garbage collection related? -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...

RE: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-13 Thread Frederico Azeiteiro
arc.desgar...@192.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 13 de Janeiro de 2010 17:20 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Problem comitting on 40GB index Just curious, have you checked if the hanging you are experiencing is not garbage collection related? -Original Message- From: Eric

RE: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-13 Thread Marc Des Garets
Just curious, have you checked if the hanging you are experiencing is not garbage collection related? -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 January 2010 13:33 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index That&#

Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-13 Thread Erick Erickson
index is being searched and if a commit is performed. > > Is this correct? > > Thanks. > Frederico > -Original Message- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: terça-feira, 12 de Janeiro de 2010 19:18 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >

RE: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-13 Thread Frederico Azeiteiro
8 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index Huh? On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : Subject: Problem comitting on 40GB index > : In-Reply-To: < > 7a9c48b51001120345h5a57dbd4o8a8a39fc4a98a...@mail.gmail.com> >

Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-12 Thread Erick Erickson
Huh? On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : Subject: Problem comitting on 40GB index > : In-Reply-To: < > 7a9c48b51001120345h5a57dbd4o8a8a39fc4a98a...@mail.gmail.com> > > http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack > Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists > > When starting a

Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-12 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Subject: Problem comitting on 40GB index : In-Reply-To: <7a9c48b51001120345h5a57dbd4o8a8a39fc4a98a...@mail.gmail.com> http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to an existing message,

Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-12 Thread Erick Erickson
inal Message- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: terça-feira, 12 de Janeiro de 2010 15:15 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index > > Rebooting the machine certainly closes the searchers, but > depending upon

RE: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-12 Thread Frederico Azeiteiro
che.org Subject: Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index Rebooting the machine certainly closes the searchers, but depending upon how you shut it down there may be stale files After reboot (but before you start SOLR), how much space is on your disk? If it's 40G, you have no stale files Ye

Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-12 Thread Erick Erickson
> Thanks, > > -Original Message- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: terça-feira, 12 de Janeiro de 2010 13:54 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index > > There are several possibilities: > > 1> yo

RE: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-12 Thread Frederico Azeiteiro
ira, 12 de Janeiro de 2010 13:54 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index There are several possibilities: 1> you have some process holding open your indexes, probably other searchers. You *probably* are OK just committing new changes if there is

Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index

2010-01-12 Thread Erick Erickson
There are several possibilities: 1> you have some process holding open your indexes, probably other searchers. You *probably* are OK just committing new changes if there is exactly *one* searcher keeping your index open. If you have some process whereby you periodically open a