That's my understanding...... But fortunately disk space is cheap <G>....
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Frederico Azeiteiro < frederico.azeite...@cision.com> wrote: > Sorry, my bad... I replied to a current mailing list message only changing > the subject... Didn't know about this " Hijacking" problem. Will not happen > again. > > Just for close this issue, if I understand correctly, for an index of 40G, > I will need, for running an optimize: > - 40G if all activity on index is stopped > - 80G if index is being searched...) > - 120G if index is being searched and if a commit is performed. > > Is this correct? > > Thanks. > Frederico > -----Original Message----- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: terça-feira, 12 de Janeiro de 2010 19:18 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Problem comitting on 40GB index > > Huh? > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Chris Hostetter > <hossman_luc...@fucit.org>wrote: > > > > > : Subject: Problem comitting on 40GB index > > : In-Reply-To: < > > 7a9c48b51001120345h5a57dbd4o8a8a39fc4a98a...@mail.gmail.com> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack > > Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists > > > > When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to > > an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the > > subject line of your email, other mail headers still track which thread > > you replied to and your question is "hidden" in that thread and gets less > > attention. It makes following discussions in the mailing list archives > > particularly difficult. > > See Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DonDiego/Thread_hijacking > > > > > > > > -Hoss > > > > >
