, ankle boots at the top of the
set!
Many thanks to all who took part.
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 February 2013 12:59
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Edismax odd results
OK, let's see the debug dat
OK, let's see the debug data for explainOther.
One thing, though. Your analysis chain is apt to be surprising. The fact
that you have 222 terms with the ":" says that you're probably not getting
what I'd guess you want. That ':' is part of your token, and will not match
"engineering", consider cha
the
set.
I'm mystified.
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 February 2013 12:49
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Edismax odd results
OK, first:
wildcarding and stemming don't get along well together. Since y
g obvious myselfbut then I'm not an expert!
>
> Regards,
>
> DQ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 20 February 2013 02:02
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Edismax odd results
>
> When you g
rg
Subject: Re: Edismax odd results
When you get back to this tomorrow, also try and paste the parsed query bits
you get back when you append &debug=all. Sometimes it's surprising what the
parsed query _really_ looks like
Best
Erick
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:13 PM, David Quart
Hi Shawn,
Schema's at http://justpaste.it/davidqhog. It's the basic SOLR 4.0 with
additions!
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: 19 February 2013 18:32
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Edismax odd results
On 2/19/
rness* and we get 0!
The stemming reduces 'engineer' to 'engin' so I'd have expected a lot more
results.
Anyone got any ideas?
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: David Quarterman [mailto:da...@corexe.com]
Sent: 19 February 2013 17:09
To: solr-user@lucene.apa
When you get back to this tomorrow, also try and paste the parsed query
bits you get back when you append &debug=all. Sometimes it's surprising
what the parsed query _really_ looks like
Best
Erick
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:13 PM, David Quarterman wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Now finished for the
Hi Shawn,
Now finished for the day but will post the schema tomorrow. Thanks for the help
(and Jack too).
Regards,
DQ
P.S. did reindex after changing schema and the analyzer/query stuff matches
precisely!!
Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 2/19/2013 11:16 AM, David Quarterman wrote:
> This is definit
On 2/19/2013 11:16 AM, David Quarterman wrote:
This is definitely driving us mad now! Changed to PorterStemming and there's
very little difference.
If we add fq=engineer, we get 0 results. Add fq=engineer* and we get the 90 in
the system. Try with fq=ankle* and we get 2. Correct. Try with fq=h
mming reduces 'engineer' to 'engin' so I'd have expected a lot more
results.
Anyone got any ideas?
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: David Quarterman [mailto:da...@corexe.com]
Sent: 19 February 2013 17:09
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Edismax od
13 16:38
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Edismax odd results
Hi Shawn,
I checked the admin analysis earlier. Stemming is taking 'engineer' down to
'engin', but then I'd have thought that a search on 'engin boots' would work
but it doesn'
x27;warning'.
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: 19 February 2013 16:25
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Edismax odd results
I do not see the word engineer (or any other similar word) in the score
calculation, only
DQ
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: 19 February 2013 15:31
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Edismax odd results
Show us your qf and pf params. Do you have PF2 set? That's the key for getting the phrase "engineer boots"
boosted highe
ogy.com]
Sent: 19 February 2013 15:31
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Edismax odd results
Show us your qf and pf params. Do you have PF2 set? That's the key for getting
the phrase "engineer boots" boosted higher than just boots. You may also simply
have to give a higher
Show us your qf and pf params. Do you have PF2 set? That's the key for
getting the phrase "engineer boots" boosted higher than just boots. You may
also simply have to give a higher PF2 boost since "boots" probably has a
much higher term frequency than "engineer" or even the natural Lucene score
16 matches
Mail list logo
