Heck, Charlie, it explains 90% of the problems I’ve personally had with
programming in general over my entire career...
> On Jul 15, 2020, at 5:08 AM, Charlie Hull wrote:
>
> On 14/07/2020 12:48, Erick Erickson wrote:
>> This is almost certainly a mismatch between what you think is
>> happenin
On 14/07/2020 12:48, Erick Erickson wrote:
This is almost certainly a mismatch between what you think is happening
and what you’ve actually told Solr to do ;).
That's a great one-line explanation of 90% of the issues people face
with Solr :-)
Charlie
Best,
Erick
On Jul 14, 2020, at 7:05
This is usually a result of either indexing or querying not quite doing what
you expect. The screenshots don’t help diagnose as they’re just the results,
but don’t really help understand why.
So here’s what I do to try to figure out why:
1> add &debug=query to the query You can check the “debug
(Lucene, so applies also to Solr)
https://michaelgibney.net/lucene/graph/
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:27 AM Jeroen Steggink | knowsy
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding phrase search in combination with a
> WordDelimiterGraphFilter (Solr 8.4.1).
>
> Whenever I try to search using a p
Hi,
I have a question regarding phrase search in combination with a
WordDelimiterGraphFilter (Solr 8.4.1).
Whenever I try to search using a phrase where token combination consists
of delimited and non-delimited tokens, I don't get any matches.
This is the configur
Thanks Mikhail,
I will check this FieldMaskingSpanQuery out.
Thanks
Melchi
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 at 19:17, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> There's no way to search with positions across other fields. I can only
> recommend to prepend prefix terms to distinguish them.
> But hold on, what about FieldMas
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your reply. I am keeping the original with the edge, but not
sure how to mark them as original. I would like to avoid a prefix match
for the full words.
You mentioned post-filter - can you shed some light on this?. If only I
can remove these over-matches, that would be great
Thanks Erick for your inputs,
Yes, i was indeed looking for this. I was little worried about the *
expansion. As it is already part of a large query. But this sounds like
the simplest way I can achieve this for now.
If I indeed slows down, will revisit this.
Was wondering if some how I can cre
There's no way to search with positions across other fields. I can only
recommend to prepend prefix terms to distinguish them.
But hold on, what about FieldMaskingSpanQuery? It's available in
XMLQparser, you may try.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 3:37 AM NewMelchizedec sundararaj
wrote:
> Hi Fellow Se
It is not clear how much flexibility you expect in those queries. Can
the second word never be full name? Can there be more than 2 words?
How do you know the length of the prefix? When you say prefix, do you
mean 'jo' is expected to match 'joseph'?
So, just generically, I would say why not index e
There's no capability in Solr to do this. Given that different fields
have different analyzer chains, how would position information be
preserved across two fields? It'd be tricky at best.
ComplexPhrase should do what you want by itself, assuming you want
matches for any doc with "steve jobs", "st
Hi Fellow Searchers,
I am indexing some content (say name) in to two fields with different
analyzer chains. One that would do edge prefix and the other regular
tokenization.
Let me call them name_prefix and name_term
When an incoming partial query comes up, like "steve jo", I want the
first word
s working fine ass expected
> expect for one feature.
>
>
>
> The exact phrase search does not return any value for some search
> criteria, and this used to work fine with the older version. Based on our
> research, those search terms with stop words and more than one word
>
expect for one feature.
>
>
>
> The exact phrase search does not return any value for some search
> criteria, and this used to work fine with the older version. Based on
> our research, those search terms with stop words and more than one
> word following it is not working.
>
When we initially launched
> the site we were using the 5.5.3 version and last sprint we updated it to the
> 7.3.1 version. Everything is working fine ass expected expect for one feature.
>
> The exact phrase search does not return any value for some search criteria,
> and this
Hi,
We are working on a .net application using Solr. When we initially launched the
site we were using the 5.5.3 version and last sprint we updated it to the 7.3.1
version. Everything is working fine ass expected expect for one feature.
The exact phrase search does not return any value for
Thank you for a quick response,
I have moved the
/ /
from // to // section and it
is working fine.
Once again
Thank you
Damian
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
The analysis page has one major thing to be aware of: It sees what
would be in the field _after_ query parsing. I applaud your use of it,
it's where lots of problems are found ;).
Try adding &debug=query in the two cases. Particularly look at the
parsedquery_tostring in the response and compare.
Hi,
I have updated Solr from 5.4.1 to 7.2.1.
I have updated the settings accordingly, but in some cases when I am
searching for an exact phrase surrounded by quotes I am getting 0 results.
In 5.4.1 I have
Please ignore this. It was a user error. I was pointing to the wrong
analyzer in my app's cfg file.
Steve
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Steven White wrote:
> Setting "sow=true" didn't make a difference.
>
> Here is what I'm using now: http://localhost:8983/
> solr/ccfts/select_test?q=%22r
Setting "sow=true" didn't make a difference.
Here is what I'm using now:
http://localhost:8983/solr/ccfts/select_test?q=%22record%20type%20session%22&wt=json&indent=true&sow=true&debugQuery=true
And here is the output:
{
"responseHeader":{
"status":0,
"QTime":1,
"params":{
"q
Hello, Steven.
Have you tried sow=true?
see
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_2/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html
Anyway, you can start from debugQuery=true, then try to explore
explainOther, and get to Analysis page after all.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 3:10 AM, Steven White wrote:
> H
Hi everyone,
I switched over from Solr 5.2.1 to 7.2.1 other than re-indexing my data and
schema design remain the same.
The issue I see now is I'm getting 0 hits on phrase searches, why?
Here is the query I'm sending that gives me 0 hits:
http://localhost:8983/solr/ccfts/select_test?q=%22cat+do
There's also an autogeneratephrasequeries parameter that goes with your
field definitions in the schema.
Make sure that is set to false.
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, 03:56 Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> If you don't set (phrase fields) pf* parameters, phrase creation is
> automatically disabled, no?
Hi,
If you don't set (phrase fields) pf* parameters, phrase creation is
automatically disabled, no?
Ahmet
On Friday, February 26, 2016 11:51 PM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
I’m creating a query from MLT terms, then sending it to edismax. The
neighboring words in the query are not meaningfu
I’m creating a query from MLT terms, then sending it to edismax. The
neighboring words in the query are not meaningful phrases.
Is there a way to turn off phrase creation and search for one query? Or should
I separate them all with “OR”?
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://obse
You are tokenising …
""
Be careful in doing first the lowercase token filter.
It's a best practice to first charFilter, then Tokenize and finally the set
of Token Filters.
Cheers
2015-06-26 13:27 GMT+01:00 Mike Thomsen :
> I tried creating a simplified new text field type that only did lower
> c
I tried creating a simplified new text field type that only did lower
casing and exact phrasing worked this time. I'm not sure what the problem
was. Perhaps it was a case of copypasta gone bad because I could have sworn
that I tried exact phrase matching against a simple text field with bad
results
Lucene, the underlying search engine library, imposes this 32K limit for
individual terms. Use tokenized text instead.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Mike Thomsen
wrote:
> I need to be able to do exact phrase searching on some documents that are a
> few hundred kb when treat
I agree with Updaya,
furthermore It doesn't make any sense to try to solve a "Phrase search"
problem , not tokenising at all the text …
It's not going to work and it is fundamentally wrong to not tokenise long
textual fields if you want to do free text search in them.
Can y
Why do you want to use the KeywordTokenizer? Why not use a text field,
and use Solr's phrase search features?
q="some phrase" will match those terms next to each other, and should be
fine with a large block of text.
Combine that with hit highlighting, and it'll return a snip
I need to be able to do exact phrase searching on some documents that are a
few hundred kb when treated as a single block of text. I'm on 4.10.4 and it
complains when I try to put something larger than 32kb in using a textfield
with the keyword tokenizer as the tokenizer. Is there any way I can ind
This is my field definition:
Then I query for this exact phrase (which I can see in various documents)
and get no results...
my_field: "baltimore po
Well, I somehow made it work by using CommonGramsFilterFactory.
Just wondering if it's the right approach ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Include-stopwords-in-phrase-search-tp4184067p4184068.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archi
Hi,
I'm having an issue running phrase quires with stopwords. Looks like Solr
is ignoring the stopword during search. Here's my search term.
"cannot open device"
When I'm executing title:"cannot open device" , it's bringing back titles
with "Find Open Devices". Here's my field definition for
wrote:
Hi All,
How to do a phrase search and then term proximity search using edismax
query parser?
For ex: If the search term is "red apples", the products having "red
apples" in their fields should be returned first and then products having
red apples with term proximity of n.
Thanks.
David
Hi All,
How to do a phrase search and then term proximity search using edismax
query parser?
For ex: If the search term is "red apples", the products having "red
apples" in their fields should be returned first and then products having
red apples with term proximity of n.
Thanks.
David
gt;
> words="stopwords.txt" />
> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/not-working-in-Phrase-Search-in-solar-4-4-tp4092205.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Certain parts of the analysis chain can be
included in wildcard processing, see
anything impolementing MultiTermAware. See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultitermQueryAnalysis
But phrases are different, and as Shawn says the
analysis chain isn't applied similarly. The data is
lowercased, but the wi
On 9/26/2013 10:15 AM, soumikghosh05 wrote:
I have a doc that contains "Hello World" in the title field and title is of
type of text_general.
When I am searching with
title:"Hello Wo*" -- not returning
title:"Hello World" -- returning
When you use wildcards, your analysis chain is not use
aceTokenizerFactory instead of StandardTokenizerFactory. But no luck.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/not-working-in-Phrase-Search-in-solar-4-4-tp4092205.html
Sent fro
Hey thanks.
Its some what works for me
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Phrase-search-without-stopwords-tp4076527p4076598.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
h without
stopwords is working but all the 3 title are coming as output.Please reply
ASAP.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Phrase-search-without-stopwords-tp4076527.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Parul,
You might find this useful : https://github.com/cominvent/exactmatch/
From: Parul Gupta(Knimbus)
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 12:03 PM
Subject: Phrase search without stopwords
Hi solr-user!!!
I have an issue
I
en exact search is working but search without stopwords is not working and
if I use WhitespaceTokenizer instead of KeywordTokenizer then search without
stopwords is working but all the 3 title are coming as output.Please reply
ASAP.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.na
different semantics in the new field's analyzer.
But also to be clear, in case anybody is simply reading the message subject
line literally, yes, phrase search is possible in Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: vicky desai
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 1:50 A
have a query in double quotes it simply ignores all the
> tokenizers and analyzers.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-phrase-search-possible-in-solr-tp4057312p4057804.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
requirement
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-phrase-search-possible-in-solr-tp4057312p4057812.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Shingling filter may be help.
> I want to do a phrase search in solr without analyzers being applied to it
> eg - If I search for *"DelhiDareDevil"* (i.e - with inverted commas)it
> should search the exact text and not apply any analyzers or tokenizers on
> this field
>
:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-phrase-search-possible-in-solr-tp4057312p4057804.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Agreed it is a typo. And yes I can use one set of analyzers and tokenizers
for query as well as indexing but that too will not solve my problem
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-phrase-search-possible-in-solr-tp4057312p4057802.html
Sent from the Solr
Oops... that's "query analyzer", not "index analyzer", so it's:
By definition, phrase search is one of two things: 1) match on a string
field literally, or 2) analyze as a sequence of tokens as per the field type
query analyzer.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Ori
By definition, phrase search is one of two things: 1) match on a string
field literally, or 2) analyze as a sequence of tokens as per the field type
index analyzer.
You could use the keyword tokenizer to store the whole field as one string,
with filtering for the whole string. Or, just make
On Apr 19, 2013, at 16:59 , vicky desai wrote:
> I want to do a phrase search in solr without analyzers being applied to it
> eg - If I search for *"DelhiDareDevil"* (i.e - with inverted commas)it
> should search the exact text and not apply any analyzers or tokenizers on
>
I want to do a phrase search in solr without analyzers being applied to it
eg - If I search for *"DelhiDareDevil"* (i.e - with inverted commas)it
should search the exact text and not apply any analyzers or tokenizers on
this field
However if i search for *DelhiDareDevil* it should use
ave been a great support!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Whole-Phrase-search-in-Solr-tp4023931p4024196.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
From: NickA
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 1:47 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whole Phrase search in Solr
Jack thank you again,
however we have the major problem that using QUOTES to bring "phrase"
results, actually does not bring any results AT ALL!
I mentioned t
;
But no results appear when quotes are used. What may be doing wrong in our
configuration?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Whole-Phrase-search-in-Solr-tp4023931p4024071.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
cess your query to convert raw phrases into quoted
phrases.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: NickA
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 12:40 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whole Phrase search in Solr
Thank you Jack,
Before doing this major change, please note t
f_.28Phrase_Fields.29
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: NickA
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 11:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whole Phrase search in Solr
Thank you Jack,
the problem with the "AND" is that it does not search for a PHRASE bu
d somewhere in the article, even
> far away the one from the other.
>
> So the suggestions that you made do not work for searching as a "PHRASE".
>
> Unless we do something wrong?
>
> Any other ideas on the PHRASE search?
>
> Thank you again!
>
>
>
>
quot; word somewhere in the article, even
far away the one from the other.
So the suggestions that you made do not work for searching as a "PHRASE".
Unless we do something wrong?
Any other ideas on the PHRASE search?
Thank you again!
--
View this message in context:
ht
well.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: NickA
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 6:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Whole Phrase search in Solr
Hello,
I am trying to achieve searching with a phrase in SOLR. Specifically I have
the following field in my sc
ge in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Whole-Phrase-search-in-Solr-tp4023931.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
, September 04, 2012 3:53 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: exception in highlighter when using phrase search
I got this problem with solr 4 beta and the highlighting component.
When I search for a phrase, such as "foo bar", everything works ok.
When I add highlighting, I get this
I got this problem with solr 4 beta and the highlighting component.
When I search for a phrase, such as "foo bar", everything works ok.
When I add highlighting, I get this exception below.
You can see according to the first log line that I am searching only one field
(all_text), but what is not
> From: Erick Erickson
> To: solr-user
> Sent: Mon, Dec 5, 2011 5:52 am
> Subject: Re: two word phrase search using dismax
>
>
> Have you looked at the "pf" (phrase fields)
> parameter of edismax?
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserP
olves
only 1,4 but 2,3.
Thanks.
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
To: solr-user
Sent: Mon, Dec 5, 2011 5:52 am
Subject: Re: two word phrase search using dismax
Have you looked at the "pf" (phrase fields)
parameter of edismax?
http://wiki.apache.org
itle.
> 3. Next, docs with both words in the content.
> 4. And finally docs having either of words in the title and content.
>
> I tried to change mm param to 1<-1 5<-2 6<90%
> This allows to achieve 1,4 but not 2,3
>
> Thanks.
> Alex.
>
>
>
&
either of words in the title and content.
I tried to change mm param to 1<-1 5<-2 6<90%
This allows to achieve 1,4 but not 2,3
Thanks.
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter
To: solr-user
Sent: Thu, Nov 17, 2011 2:17 pm
Subject: Re: two word phrase s
: After putting the same score for title and content in qf filed, docs
: with both words in content moved to fifth place. The doc in the first,
: third and fourth places still have only one of the words in content and
: title. The doc in the second place has one of the words in title and
: bot
second place has one of the words in title and both words in the
content but in different places not together.
Thanks.
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Kuhlmann
To: solr-user
Sent: Tue, Nov 15, 2011 12:20 am
Subject: Re: two word phrase search using dismax
Am 14.11.2011 21:50
Am 14.11.2011 21:50, schrieb alx...@aim.com:
Hello,
I use solr3.4 and nutch 1.3. In request handler we have
2<-1 5<-2 6<90%
As fas as I know this means that for two word phrase search match must be 100%.
However, I noticed that in most cases documents with both words are ranked
Hi, Ludovic
That's just what I'm looking for.
You're been a big help.
Thank you so much.
Jason.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Phrase-search-error-tp3423799p3423916.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Jason,
you could add this filter to the end of your analyzer :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.PositionFilterFactory
That should solve your problem.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Phrase
Hi, all
When I queried a phrase search "test mp3", I got some error below.
I think that the problem is because of WordDelimiterFilter.
In WordDelimiterFilter 'mp3' is splited pos1:mp, pos2:(3, mp3).
In such a case, the positions of subword and catenateword are incremented.
I
Hi, all
I want to use both EdegeNGram analysis and phrase search.
But there is some problem.
On Field which is not using EdgeNGram analysis, phrase search.is good work.
But if using EdgeNGram then phrase search is incorrect.
Now I'm using Solr1.4.0.
Result of EdgeNGram analysis for "p
Darira wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to do pharse searching with single/double quotes. Also there are
> cases that those phrases include special characters like & etc.
>
> What all i need to do while indexing such special characters & while
> searching them. How to handle phrase search with quotes
>
> Please suggest
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Pawan Darira
>
'\"' || c == '{' || c == '}'
|| c == '~'
|| c == '*' || c == '?' || c == '|' || c == '&' || c == ';'
|| Character.isWhitespace(c)) {
sb.append('\\');
}
sb.append(c);
}
return sb.toStri
Hi
I want to do pharse searching with single/double quotes. Also there are
cases that those phrases include special characters like & etc.
What all i need to do while indexing such special characters & while
searching them. How to handle phrase search with quotes
Please suggest
--
: I have question is it possible to perform a phrase search with wild cards
in
: solr/lucene as if i have two queries both have exactly same results one is
: +Contents:"change market"
:
: and other is
: +Contents:"chnage* market"
:
: but i think the second should matc
//sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Ahson Iqbal
> To: Solr Send Mail
> Sent: Thu, October 14, 2010 1:28:30 AM
> Subject: Question related to phrase search in lucene/solr?
>
> hi all
hi all
I have question is it possible to perform a phrase search with wild cards in
solr/lucene as if i have two queries both have exactly same results one is
+Contents:"change market"
and other is
+Contents:"chnage* market"
but i think the second should match "c
On 08/09/2010 12:21, Grijesh.singh wrote:
see the analysis.jsp with debug verbose and see what happens at index time
and search time during analysis with your data
Also u can use debugQuery=on for seeing what actually parsed query is.
-
Grijesh
I've found a first solution by myself, usi
see the analysis.jsp with debug verbose and see what happens at index time
and search time during analysis with your data
Also u can use debugQuery=on for seeing what actually parsed query is.
-
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Phrase-search
Hello,
well, first, here's the field type that is searched :
ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
mapping="mapping-ISOLatin1Accent.txt"/>
mapping="mapping-ISOLatin1Accent.txt"/>
here's the synonym from the synonyms-fr.txt file :
...
PS,Parti socialiste
...
and here's the query :
Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> several documents from my index contain the phrase : "PS et".
> However, PS is expanded to "parti socialiste" and a phrase search for "PS
> et" fails.
> A phrase search for "parti s
Hi,
several documents from my index contain the phrase : "PS et".
However, PS is expanded to "parti socialiste" and a phrase search for
"PS et" fails.
A phrase search for "parti socialiste et" succeeds.
Can I have both q
: I'm trying to match "Apple 2" but not "Apple2" using phrase search, this is
why I have it quoted.
: I was under the impression --when I use phrase search-- all the
: analyzer magic would not apply, but it is!!! Otherwise, how would I
: search for a phrase?!
I'm trying to match "Apple 2" but not "Apple2" using phrase search, this is why
I have it quoted.
I was under the impression --when I use phrase search-- all the analyzer magic
would not apply, but it is!!! Otherwise, how would I search for a phrase?!
Using
: I don't understand why i'm getting this behavior. I was under the
: impression if I search for "Apple 2" (with quotes and space before “2”)
: it will give me different results vs. if I search for "Apple2" (with
: quotes and no space before “2”), but I'm not! Why?
if you search "Apple 2" in
pache.org
Sent: Mon, Aug 2, 2010 3:54 pm
Subject: RE: Re: Phrase search
Hi,
Queries on an analyzed field will need to be analyzed as well or it might not
atch. You can configure the WordDelimiterFilterFactory so it will not split
nto multiple tokens because of numerics, see the splitOnNumerics param
/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory
Cheers,
-Original message-
From: johnmu...@aol.com
Sent: Mon 02-08-2010 21:29
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: Re: Phrase search
Thanks for the quick response.
Which part of my WordDelimiterFilterFactory is changing
Thanks for the quick response.
Which part of my WordDelimiterFilterFactory is changing "Apple 2" to "Apple2"?
How do I fix it? Also, I'm really confused about this. I was under the
impression a phrase search is not impacted by the analyzer, no?
-M
-O
-Original message-
From: johnmu...@aol.com
Sent: Mon 02-08-2010 20:18
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: Phrase search
Hi All,
I don't understand why i'm getting this behavior. I was under the impression
if I search for "Apple 2" (with quotes and space before 2 ) it will
Hi All,
I don't understand why i'm getting this behavior. I was under the impression
if I search for "Apple 2" (with quotes and space before “2”) it will give me
different results vs. if I search for "Apple2" (with quotes and no space before
“2”), but I'm not! Why?
Here is my fieldType s
> I wanted to do phrase search. What are the analyzers
> that best suited for phrase search. I tried with
> "textgen", but it did not yield the expected results.
>
> I wanted to index:
>
> my dear friend
>
> If I search for "dear friend", I shou
2010 at 8:30 PM, Naga Darbha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to do phrase search. What are the analyzers that best suited for
> phrase search. I tried with "textgen", but it did not yield the expected
> results.
>
> I wanted to index:
>
> my dear friend
>
>
Hi,
I wanted to do phrase search. What are the analyzers that best suited for
phrase search. I tried with "textgen", but it did not yield the expected
results.
I wanted to index:
my dear friend
If I search for "dear friend", I should get the result and if I search
t='633' left='244' word='qux'
num='1'>qux</page>
</document>
I can get all terms in my search result with them payloads.
But if I do search using phrase query I can't fetch any result.
Example:
search?q=foo
1
search?q=foo+ba
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
