Nevermind I think we found this was caused by a bug in our (new) custom indexer
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 4:11 PM matthew sporleder wrote:
>
> I have a copyField:
>
>
>
> But sometimes preview ( indexed="true" stored="true" multiValued="true" />) is not populated.
>
> It appears that the "catcha
I have a copyField:
But sometimes preview () is not populated.
It appears that the "catchall" field does not get created when preview
has no content in it. Can I use required=false or similar on a
copyField?
Thanks,
Matt
the reason why JOIN works is because of the Calcite framework. The parallel
sql features leverages Calcite, which implements all the sql features, all
you need is to provide the way for calcite to get the collection/table, in
solr this is done by the SolrTable.java (package
org.apache.solr.handler.
There isn't any real support for joins in Parallel SQL currently. I'm
surprised that you're having some success doing them. Can you provide a
sample SQL join that is working for you?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 3:32 AM Piero Scrima wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Al
Hi,
Although there is no trace of join functionality in the official Solr
documentation
(https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/parallel-sql-interface.html),
joining in parallel sql works in practice. It only works if the field is
not a multivalued field. For my project it would be fantastic if
Dear all,
Although there is no trace of join functionality in the official Solr
documentation
(https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/parallel-sql-interface.html),
joining in parallel sql works in practice. It only works if the field is
not a multivalued field. For my project it would be fantast
hll stands for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HyperLogLog
You will not get the exact distinct count, but a distinct count very close to
the real number. It is very fast and memory efficient for large number of
distinct values.
> Am 10.03.2020 um 00:25 schrieb Nicolas Paris :
>
>
> Erick Erick
Erick Erickson writes:
> Have you looked at the HyperLogLog stuff? Here’s at least a mention of
> it: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/the-stats-component.html
I am used to hll in the context of count distinct values -- cardinality.
I have to admit that section
https://lucene.apache.o
Toke Eskildsen writes:
> JSON faceting allows you to skip the fine counting with the parameter
> refine:
I also tried the facet.refine parameter, but didn't notice any improvement.
>> I am wondering how I could filter the documents to get approximate
>> facets ?
>
> Clunky idea: Introduce a
rds with xmx = 120GO and ssd disks
> - 50M documents / 40GO physical per shard
> - mainly large texts fields and also, one multivalue/docvalue/indexed string
> list of 15 values per document
>
>
> Goal:
> I want to provide terms facet on a string multivalue field. This of
On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 10:39 +0100, Nicolas Paris wrote:
> I want to provide terms facet on a string multivalue field.
> ...
> How to improve brute performances ?
It might help to have everything in a single shard, to avoid the
secondary fine count. But your index is rather large for sin
Hello,
Environment:
- SolrCloud 8.4.1
- 4 shards with xmx = 120GO and ssd disks
- 50M documents / 40GO physical per shard
- mainly large texts fields and also, one multivalue/docvalue/indexed string
list of 15 values per document
Goal:
I want to provide terms facet on a string multivalue field
On 5/7/2019 5:45 AM, Jie Luo wrote:
For the fields that are set as stored true, query works fine, but for fields
that are set as stored false, the query does not work after the documents are
updated.
SolrInputDocument solrInputDocument = new SolrInputDocument();
solrInputDocum
rocess is to build the SolrDocuments and indexes,
>> other processes try to update the other fields of the solrdocuments and
>> their indexes. Then I noticed that when I search previous indexed
>> multivalue fields (not stored), it returns wrong results (fewer data). I
>>
019, at 3:57 AM, Jie Luo wrote:
>
> Dear solr user,
>
> I have processes, first process is to build the SolrDocuments and indexes,
> other processes try to update the other fields of the solrdocuments and their
> indexes. Then I noticed that when I search previous indexed
dexes,
> other processes try to update the other fields of the solrdocuments and their
> indexes. Then I noticed that when I search previous indexed multivalue
> fields (not stored), it returns wrong results (fewer data). I tested with
> five documents, it will only return one docu
Dear solr user,
I have processes, first process is to build the SolrDocuments and indexes,
other processes try to update the other fields of the solrdocuments and their
indexes. Then I noticed that when I search previous indexed multivalue fields
(not stored), it returns wrong results (fewer
> Edwin
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 05:53, Kumaresh AK wrote:
>
> > How would I go about change by field type to facilitate highlighting ? I
> > tried hl on my current schema and the highlight section is empty. I
> guess I
> > need to change to multivalue tex
son for my Solr jira bug Solr-13367.
This used to work in Solr 5.1.0 but it is broken in newer versions of Solr (at
least in 7.5.0, 7.7.1, 8.0.0)
Karl
-Original Message-
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 9:36 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multival
hl on my current schema and the highlight section is empty. I guess I
> need to change to multivalue text. Currently it is String Field as these
> are identifiers and no analysis needed on those
>
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 5:29 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> > Btw, can
How would I go about change by field type to facilitate highlighting ? I
tried hl on my current schema and the highlight section is empty. I guess I
need to change to multivalue text. Currently it is String Field as these
are identifiers and no analysis needed on those
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at
Btw, can it be done by highlighting?
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 3:22 PM Kumaresh AK wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
> Thanks for the response. I see the results have the details I am looking
> for. But it is not well structured. I sense that the debug=results is for
> understanding the scoring behind the resu
Hi Mikhail,
Thanks for the response. I see the results have the details I am looking
for. But it is not well structured. I sense that the debug=results is for
understanding the scoring behind the results which can be more than what I
am looking for. Is there any other way ? The multivalued field ma
Hello, Kumaresh!
If you turn it to q you may try debug=results&debug.explain.structured=true
with some performance impact.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 2:41 AM Kumaresh AK wrote:
> Hello!
> I am new to SOLR. This is my field type definition:
>
> > > stored="true" multiValued="true" omitTermFreqAndP
Hello!
I am new to SOLR. This is my field type definition:
> stored="true" multiValued="true" omitTermFreqAndPositions="true"
> omitNorms="true" />
One use-case we have is to lookup multiple myid with an OR like
> fq=myid:(1 2 3 4..)
I wish to know which entry in the fq matched this document.
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 05:44:30PM -0800, Erick Erickson wrote:
> No, the idea is that you have N single valued fields, one for each of
> the MV entries you have. The copyField dest would be MV, and only used
> in those cases you wanted to match across values. Not saying that's a
> great solution,
bq. multiple fields acts as a MV field
No, the idea is that you have N single valued fields, one for each of
the MV entries you have. The copyField dest would be MV, and only used
in those cases you wanted to match across values. Not saying that's a
great solution, or if it would even necessarily
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:30:33AM -0800, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Have you looked at ComplexPhraseQueryParser here?
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/other-parsers.html
Sure. However, I am using multi-word synonyms and so far the
complexphrase does not handle them. (maybe soon ?)
> Depen
there a chance such feature will be developed in future SolR version ? I
> mean something
> allowing considering multivalued fields independently ? A new field
> attribute such independentMultivalued=true would be ok ?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> [1]:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Search-only-for-single-value-of-Solr-multivalue-field-td4309850.html#a4309893
>
> --
> nicolas
xt:([000 TO 001] AND "second")
QUESTION:
-
Is there a chance such feature will be developed in future SolR version ? I
mean something
allowing considering multivalued fields independently ? A new field
attribute such independentMultivalued=true would be ok ?
Thanks,
[1
Are default values supported for fields defined as multivalued text? I can't
get it to work.
Scouring the documentation, I found nothing indicating the two attributes are
mutually exclusive.
I found a couple of online examples indicating the two attributes can be used
together.
I have this f
Hi Dorian,
Firstly thanks for your response, but it does not seems to work.
Here is another example, I want to search document with affiliations
contains the NHM (Natural History Museum) of India. So, I want to only
get the document with id=2 :
1
NHM, Austria
Annamalai Univ, Ind
Phrase queries and slop and positionIncrementGap ;)
The fieldType has a positionIncrementGap. This is the token delta
between the end token of one entry and the beginning of the next.
so the first entry: IFREMER, Ctr Brest, DRO Geosci Marines, F-29280
Plouzane, France
IFREMER would have a positio
You should be able to filter "(word1 in field OR word2 in field) AND
NOT(word1 in field AND word2 in field)". Translate that into the right
syntax.
I don't know if lucene is smart enough to execute the filter only once (it
should be i guess).
Makes sense ?
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Leo BRU
Hi,
I have a multivalued field in my schema called "idx_affilliation".
IFREMER, Ctr Brest, DRO Geosci Marines,
F-29280 Plouzane, France.
Univ Lisbon, Ctr Geofis, P-1269102
Lisbon, Portugal.
Univ Bretagne Occidentale, Inst Univ
Europeen Mer, Lab Domaines Ocean, F-29280 Plouzane, France.
Total
Great, I'm not sure if you noticed that SOLR-9537 has been committed and
will be in 6.3. So now you can directly wrap a facet expression with the
scoreNodes expression.
Yeah, other scoring algorithms would be a great thing. We can adjust the
ScoreNodesStream to make this more flexible. Feel free t
Joel -- thanks! Got this working and now feel in a better shape to grok
what's happening
Out of curiosity, is there any work being done to customize scoreNodes
scoring? There's a bunch of other forms of similarity I wouldn't mind
playing with as well.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:06 PM Joel Bernstei
You could use the facet() expression which works with multi-value fields.
This emits aggregated tuples useful for recommendations. For example:
facet(baskets,
q="item:taco",
buckets="item",
bucketSorts="count(*) desc",
bucketSizeLimit="100",
count(*))
I have a field like follows in my search index
{
"shopper_id": 1234,
"basket_id": 2512,
"items_bought": ["eggs", "tacos", "nachos"]
}
{
"shopper_id" 1236,
"basket_id": 2515,
"items_bought": ["eggs", "tacos", "chicken", "bubble gum"]
}
I would like to use some of the stream expr
> >
> > runInterval="6",
> >
> > update(users,
> >
> > batchSize=10,
> >
> > jdbc(connection="jdbc:mysql://localhost/users?user=root&password=solr",
> > sql="SELECT id, name FROM users", sort="id asc",
> > driver="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver")
> >
> > )
> >
> > What's the best way to handle a multivalue field using this API? Is
> > there a way to tokenize something returned in a database field?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
--
http://www.the111shift.com
quot;SELECT id, name FROM users", sort="id asc",
> driver="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver")
>
> )
>
> What's the best way to handle a multivalue field using this API? Is
> there a way to tokenize something returned in a database field?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
nnection="jdbc:mysql://localhost/users?user=root&password=solr",
sql="SELECT id, name FROM users", sort="id asc",
driver="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver")
)
What's the best way to handle a multivalue field using this API? Is
there a way to tokenize something returned in a database field?
Thanks,
Mike
it might be a bug.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >Alex.
> >
> > Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
> > http://www.solr-start.com/
> >
> >
> > On 8 September 2015 at 17:22, Curtis Fehr wrote:
> >
lyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
> http://www.solr-start.com/
>
>
> On 8 September 2015 at 17:22, Curtis Fehr wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm attempting to facet a multivalue int field that has docvalues
>> enabled. Using the new json fac
>Alex.
>
> Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
> http://www.solr-start.com/
>
>
> On 8 September 2015 at 17:22, Curtis Fehr wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm attempting to facet a multivalue int field that has docvalue
, Curtis Fehr wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm attempting to facet a multivalue int field that has docvalues
> enabled. Using the new json facet api, running 5.3.0, I get the
> exception here: http://pastebin.com/xNaqGJRf
>
> Here's the relevant config:
> docValues=&
Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 8 September 2015 at 17:22, Curtis Fehr wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm attempting to facet a multivalue int field that has docvalues enabled.
> Using the new json facet api, running 5.3.0, I get
Hello!
I'm attempting to facet a multivalue int field that has docvalues enabled.
Using the new json facet api, running 5.3.0, I get the exception here:
http://pastebin.com/xNaqGJRf
Here's the relevant config:
Here's my facet:
json.facet={"pv-44":{"type&quo
We had a similar problem, when searching we wanted to return the doc, and
for the multi-valued field we wanted to show only the value that matched
the search.
This was used for an advanced auto suggestion.
As Upaya specified, Highlighting was the good solution for us.
Managing in the UI only the
The result that Solr returns is the document, not anything beneath, so
no, you cannot do this.
You could use highlighting, you could parse the output of explains
(&debug.explains.structured=true will help) to identify which field
triggered the match. Alternatively, you could use block joins. Make
Dear List,
In my schema I have a couple multi value fields and I would need to retrive
the index of which one generated a match. For example let's suppose I have
a text field like this with three values:
MyField:
[0] Red
[1] Blue
[2] Green
Searching for "Blue" gets me the document, but I would al
Can you do after DIH in the UpdateRequestProcessor chain? Might be
cleaner than trying to hack the multi-path processing in DIH.
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
On 10 February 2015 at 04:29, Pankaj Sonawane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am usin
Hi,
I am using Solr DataImportHandler to index data from database
table(Oracle). One of the column contains String of ='s and ','s (Please
column3 in example below)
Like
Column1 = "F"
Column2 = "ASDF"
*Column3 = "A=1,B=2,C=3,D=4..Z=26"*
I want solr to index each 'alphabet' against it
Hi all,
I uploaded a patch (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5972) that
contains a new statistics result for a field - existInDoc.
It returns the number of documents in which the field has a value (not missing).
This patch is bason on Solr 4.4.
For multivalue fields there is a
"while indexing add a field containing the number" isn't suitable for my
case. I can't add new field and do indexing.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Term-count-in-multivalue-fields-tp4168138p4168400.html
Sent from the Solr - User mai
t;
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Term-count-in-multivalue-fields-tp4168138p4168167.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Andrey, thank you for reply. Can you explain what do you mean "faceting query
with prefix"? I'm newer in the wolrd of Solr, can you give me example of
this query?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Term-count-in-multivalue-fields-tp4168138p41
esults due to reason I've stated above.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Nickolay41189 wrote:
> I have multivalue field in my schema.xml:
> stored="true" multivalue="true"
> omitNorms="true" omitTermFreqAndPositions="true"/>
I have multivalue field in my schema.xml:
I have indexed the following documents:
...
bmp
zip
bmp
...
...
zip
zip
bmp
...
How can I retrieve the count of the term "zip" (in this example it must be
3) from all multivalued field in this ind
: Tomer Levi
> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 4:19 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; Ahmet Arslan
> Subject: RE: Ignoring Duplicates in Multivalue Field
>
>
> Hi Ahmet,
> When I add the RunUpdateProcessorFactory Solr didn't remove any
> duplications.
> Any other idea?
&g
cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Tomer Levi
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 4:19 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; Ahmet Arslan
Subject: RE: Ignoring Duplicates in Multivalue Field
Hi Ahmet,
When I add the RunU
es in Multivalue Field
Hi Tomer,
What happens when you addto your chain?
Ahmet
On Sunday, November 2, 2014 1:22 PM, Tomer Levi wrote:
Hi,
I’m trying to make my “update” request handler ignore multivalue duplications
in updates.
To make my use case clear, let’s assume my index already con
Hi Tomer,
What happens when you addto your chain?
Ahmet
On Sunday, November 2, 2014 1:22 PM, Tomer Levi wrote:
Hi,
I’m trying to make my “update” request handler ignore multivalue duplications
in updates.
To make my use case clear, let’s assume my index already contains a document
Hi,
I'm trying to make my "update" request handler ignore multivalue duplications
in updates.
To make my use case clear, let's assume my index already contains a document
like:
{
id:"100",
"myMultValueField": ["1","2",&qu
nder\", \"\"]]",
>> > > >"[]",
>> > > >"[[\"hifte\", \"Grop\", \"\"]]"
>> > > >]
>> > > >
>> > > >// Doc 2
>> > > >
>> > > >&
"[[\"Ethan\", \"G\", \"\"],[\"Steve\", \"\", \"\"]]",
> > > >"[]",
> > > >]
> > > >
> > > >Here, how do I find the document with Name that co
t doesn't work.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ahmet Arslan >
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Ethan,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> It is hard to unde
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ahmet Arslan >
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Ethan,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> It is hard to understand your example. Can you re-write it?
e-write it? Using xml?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Friday, June 6, 2014 9:07 PM, Ethan wrote:
> >> Bumping the thread to see if anyone has a solution.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Friday, June 6, 2014 9:07 PM, Ethan wrote:
> >> Bumping the thread to see if anyone has a solution.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Ethan wrote:
> >>
&
Wildcard search do work on multiValued field. I was able to pull up
>> > records for following multiValued field -
>> >
>> > Code : [
>> > "12344",
>> > "4534",
>> > "674"
>> > ]
>> >
>> > q=Code:45* fe
t; > > records for following multiValued field -
> > >
> > > Code : [
> > > "12344",
> > > "4534",
> > > "674"
> > > ]
> > >
> > > q=Code:45* fetched the correct document. It doesn't work
ed the correct document. It doesn't work in
> > quotes(q="Code:45*"), however. Is there a workaround?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Ethan wrote:
> >
> >> Are you implying there is not way to lookup on a multiValued field with
sky
-Original Message-
From: Ethan
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 5:16 PM
To: solr-user ; Ahmet Arslan
Subject: Re: Multivalue wild card search
Ahmet,
Assuming there is a multiValued field called "Name" of type string stored
in index -
//Doc 1
"id" : 23512
"Ho
ot;,
> > "674"
> > ]
> >
> > q=Code:45* fetched the correct document. It doesn't work in
> > quotes(q="Code:45*"), however. Is there a workaround?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Ethan wrote:
> >
> >&
Wildcard, fuzzy, and regex query do work on multivalued fields, but on only
a single value at a time. Your match cannot occur across values.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ethan
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 12:52 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Multivalue wild card search
ote:
>>
>>> Wildcard, fuzzy, and regex query operate on a single term of a single
>>> tokenized field value or a single string field value.
>>>
>>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>>
>>> -Original Message- From: Ethan
>>> Sent: Wedne
le string field value.
>>>
>>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>>
>>> -Original Message- From: Ethan
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 6:59 PM
>>> To: solr-user
>>> Subject: Multivalue wild card search
>>>
>>>
and regex query operate on a single term of a single
>> tokenized field value or a single string field value.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Ethan
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 6:59 PM
>> To: solr-user
>> Subjec
string field value.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Ethan
> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 6:59 PM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Multivalue wild card search
>
>
> I can't seem to find a solution to do wild card search on a multiValued
> fi
Wildcard, fuzzy, and regex query operate on a single term of a single
tokenized field value or a single string field value.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ethan
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 6:59 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Multivalue wild card search
I can't seem to
I can't seem to find a solution to do wild card search on a multiValued
field.
For Eg consider a multiValued field called "Name" with 3 values -
"Name" : [
"[[\"Ethan\", \"G\", \"\"],[\"Steve\", \"Wonder\", \"\"]]",
"[]",
"[[\"hifte\", \"Grop\", \"\"]]"
]
For a multiValued like above, I want sea
ermQuery(new Term("BookingRecordId", "234"));
> > SpanQuery q2 = new SpanTermQuery(new Term("OrderLineType", "11"));
> > SpanQuery q2m new FieldMaskingSpanQuery(q2, "BookingRecordId");
> > Query q = new SpanNearQuery(new SpanQuery[
y don't understand joins very well. Just a guess may
> be FieldMaskingSpanQuery could be used?
>
>
> http://blog.griddynamics.com/2011/07/solr-experience-search-parent-child.html
>
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:46 PM, Vijay K
> wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
> I personally don't understand joins very well. Just a guess may
> be FieldMaskingSpanQuery could be used?
>
>
> http://blog.griddynamics.com/2011/07/solr-experience-search-parent-child.html
>
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
>
> On W
, 2014 10:39 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>>Hi Vijay,
>>
>>I personally don't understand joins very well. Just a guess may be
>>FieldMaskingSpanQuery could be used?
>>
>>http://blog.griddynamics.com/2011/07/solr-experience-search-parent-child.html
>>
>
; Query q = new SpanNearQuery(new SpanQuery[]{q1, q2m}, -1, false);
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 10:39 PM, Ahmet Arslan
> wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
> I personally don't understand joins very well. Just a guess may
> be FieldMaskingSpanQuery could be
Sounds good... for Lucene users, but for Solr users... sounds like a Jira is
needed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 4:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; kokatnur.vi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Searching multivalue fields
ion.
In it's current state, our application is storing child items as multivalue
fields. Consider some orders, for example -
{
OrderId:123
BookingRecordId : ["145", "987", "*234*"]
OrderLineType : ["11", "12", "*13*"]
.
hread again one last time to see if anyone has a
solution.
In it's current state, our application is storing child items as multivalue
fields. Consider some orders, for example -
{
OrderId:123
BookingRecordId : ["145", "987", "*234*"]
OrderLineType : [&
Hi,
I am bumping this thread again one last time to see if anyone has a
solution.
In it's current state, our application is storing child items as multivalue
fields. Consider some orders, for example -
{
OrderId:123
BookingRecordId : ["145", "987", "*234*"
have approach-1 where I have around 100 million documents and
some group by queries really perform slow. I have freedom to reduce number
of docs and group multiple documents into one and put identifier into multi
value field. As I always search from multivalue field
--
View this message in context
t; Hello Solr Users,
>
> i'm trying to get Tika's "BinFileDataSource" to take the filenames
> from a multivalue field (array) but I'm getting the following
> exception:
>
> Debug output from running dataimport (shortenend):
>
>
>
, Bustaa wrote:
Hello Solr Users,
i'm trying to get Tika's "BinFileDataSource" to take the filenames
from a multivalue field (array) but I'm getting the following
exception:
Debug output from running dataimport (shortenend):
"query",
"
Hello Solr Users,
i'm trying to get Tika's "BinFileDataSource" to take the filenames
from a multivalue field (array) but I'm getting the following
exception:
Debug output from running dataimport (shortenend):
"query",
"<&l
Hi all,
i am facing an issue while trying to update a document.
I am using SolrJ to add/update documents of my collection. The SolrJ
version is 4.0.0 ( but i also tried with the latest 4.4.0 )
I am aware that in multivalue fields i can only add an element but not
remove, in fact for those fields
: i am facing an issue while trying to update a document.
: I am using SolrJ to add/update documents of my collection. The SolrJ
: I am aware that in multivalue fields i can only add an element but not
: remove, in fact for those fields I am overriding all the values every time.
: Everything
our suggestion :-).
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/multiValued-How-do-I-specify-name-to-each-value-returned-by-multiValue-field-tp4083922p4084150.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e
> So your doc would look something like this:
>
>
>
> Micheal
>
>
>
> Schumacher
>
>
> 090933434343
>
>
> 052323232323
>
>
> 073628362782
>
>
>
>
>
> 090933434343
>
>
>
> 052323232323
>
>
>
> 073628362782
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/multiValued-How-do-I-specify-name-to-each-value-returned-by-multiValue-field-tp4083922p4084149.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
name to each value returned by
multiValue field.
Hi All,
I have a multiValued field, and it returns the result in the following
manner
Micheal
Schumacher
090933434343
052323232323
073628362782
In the above document phones is multiValued and it works fine :-). However I
would like to name
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
