Thanks Edwin for the information. I will try highlighting.. On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 7:53 PM Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You need to set the field which you want to highlight in the hl.fl > parameter in your solrconfig.xml. > Highlighting can work in String field. > > Regards, > Edwin > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 05:53, Kumaresh AK <kumaresh...@nielsen.com> wrote: > > > How would I go about change by field type to facilitate highlighting ? I > > tried hl on my current schema and the highlight section is empty. I > guess I > > need to change to multivalue text. Currently it is String Field as these > > are identifiers and no analysis needed on those.... > > > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 5:29 AM Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Btw, can it be done by highlighting? > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 3:22 PM Kumaresh AK <kumaresh...@nielsen.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Mikhail, > > > > Thanks for the response. I see the results have the details I am > > looking > > > > for. But it is not well structured. I sense that the debug=results is > > for > > > > understanding the scoring behind the results which can be more than > > what > > > I > > > > am looking for. Is there any other way ? The multivalued field may > have > > > > some 50 items in it at most. And the query will be limited to 100 > > values. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 1:04 AM Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, Kumaresh! > > > > > > > > > > If you turn it to q you may try > > > > debug=results&debug.explain.structured=true > > > > > with some performance impact. > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 2:41 AM Kumaresh AK < > kumaresh...@nielsen.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > I am new to SOLR. This is my field type definition: > > > > > > > > > > > > > <fieldType name="myid_type" class="solr.StrField" > indexed="true" > > > > > > > stored="true" multiValued="true" > omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" > > > > > > > omitNorms="true" /> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One use-case we have is to lookup multiple myid with an OR like > > > > > > > > > > > > > fq=myid:(1 2 3 4..) > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish to know which entry in the fq matched this document. I am > > > doing > > > > a > > > > > > group query now as a hack. like: > > > > > > > > > > > > > "group.query":["myid:1", "myid:2",...] > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a better way to do this ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Kumaresh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Sincerely yours > > > > > Mikhail Khludnev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sincerely yours > > > Mikhail Khludnev > > > > > >