eers
>
> 2015-06-15 13:16 GMT+01:00 Argho Chatterjee <
> joy.chatterjee.crazyc...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I had posted a question on stackoverflow.com after performing a few POCs
>>
>> My hadrware consist of a single i-3 intel processor (4
GB Ram, Laptop machine.
>
> My Question Link :
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30823314/lucene-vs-solr-indexning-speed-for-sampe-data
>
> but no one could solve it as of now..
> I hope the question I posted is undertandable.
>
> Please if anyone could help me out with the
Hello Everyone,
I had posted a question on stackoverflow.com after performing a few POCs
My hadrware consist of a single i-3 intel processor (4 CPU as per "dxdiag"
on run ), 8GB Ram, Laptop machine.
My Question Link :
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30823314/lucene-vs-solr-index
an wrote:
>>> Solr has no limitation on the number of cores. It's limited by your
>>> hardware,
>>> inodes and how many files you could keep open.
>>>
>>> I think even if you went the Lucene route you would run into same hardware
>>> limit
>> > ...yet.
>> >
>> > -glen
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Lan wrote:
>> >> Solr has no limitation on the number of cores. It's limited by your
>> hardware,
>> >> inodes and how many files you could keep ope
think even if you went the Lucene route you would run into same
> hardware
> >> limits.
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Solr-design-decision-tp3813457p3813511.html
> >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -
> > http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/
> > -
>
>
--
Alireza Salimi
Java EE Developer
n.
>>
>> I think even if you went the Lucene route you would run into same hardware
>> limits.
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Solr-design-decision-tp3813457p3813511.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> --
> -
> http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/
> -
's limited by your
> hardware,
> > inodes and how many files you could keep open.
> >
> > I think even if you went the Lucene route you would run into same
> hardware
> > limits.
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472
uld run into same hardware
> limits.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Solr-design-decision-tp3813457p3813511.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
-
http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/
-
Solr has no limitation on the number of cores. It's limited by your hardware,
inodes and how many files you could keep open.
I think even if you went the Lucene route you would run into same hardware
limits.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-vs
r user.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Solr-design-decision-tp3813457p3813489.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Alireza Salimi
Java EE Developer
Solr has cores which are independent search indexes. You could create a
separate core per user.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Solr-design-decision-tp3813457p3813489.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi everybody,
Let's say we have a system with billions of small documents (average of 2-3
fields).
and each document belongs to JUST ONE user
and searches are user specific, meaning that when we search
for something, we just look into documents of that user.
On the other hand we need to see the n
Is that right?
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:08 PM, findbestopensource <
findbestopensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have posted an article Lucene vs Solr
> http://www.findbestopensource.com/article-detail/lucene-vs-solr
>
> Please feel free to add your commen
14 matches
Mail list logo
