Great answer Robert. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Robert Stewart <bstewart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Split up index into say 100 cores, and then route each search to a specific > core by some mod operator on the user id: > > core_number = userid % num_cores > > core_name = "core"+core_number > > That way each index core is relatively small (maybe 100 million docs or less). > > > On Mar 9, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Glen Newton wrote: > >> millions of cores will not work... >> ...yet. >> >> -glen >> >> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Lan <dung....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Solr has no limitation on the number of cores. It's limited by your >>> hardware, >>> inodes and how many files you could keep open. >>> >>> I think even if you went the Lucene route you would run into same hardware >>> limits. >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Solr-design-decision-tp3813457p3813511.html >>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> -- >> - >> http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/ >> - >
-- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076
