About a simple client/server benchmark on lucene/solr with luceneutil

Hi All, I built a server with Lucene/Solr (branch_8_0, <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/branch_8_0> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/branch_8_0) and used a client to test the server. However, when the client sent requests, I found the server outputs lots of seemingly

Re: Lucene-Solr project split

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raab13cabe321d12b6cda7dc6e529176f51ece31d30f00997dd36570a%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E >> >> Ilan >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:10 PM Dominique Bejean < >> dominique.bej...@eolya.fr> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> One of my clients claims that

Re: Lucene-Solr project split

, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:10 PM Dominique Bejean > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> One of my clients claims that the Lucene-Solr project will split into two >> separate projects after a vote of the community. I cannot find any trace >> of >> discussions on this subject. Is it true ? >> >> Regards. >> >> Dominique >> >

Re: Lucene-Solr project split

Yes. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raab13cabe321d12b6cda7dc6e529176f51ece31d30f00997dd36570a%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E Ilan On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:10 PM Dominique Bejean wrote: > Hi, > > One of my clients claims that the Lucene-Solr project will split into two > separ

Lucene-Solr project split

Hi, One of my clients claims that the Lucene-Solr project will split into two separate projects after a vote of the community. I cannot find any trace of discussions on this subject. Is it true ? Regards. Dominique

Re: Haystack CFP is open, come and tell us how you tune relevance for Lucene/Solr

aystackconf.com <http://www.haystackconf.com>including links to previous talks, deadline is 31st January. We'd love to hear your Lucene/Solr relevance stories. Cheers Charlie -- Charlie Hull Flax - Open Source Enterprise Search tel/fax: +44 (0)8700 118334 mobile: +44 (0)7767 825828 web: ww

Re: Haystack CFP is open, come and tell us how you tune relevance for Lucene/Solr

t;> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 4:13 AM Charlie Hull wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Haystack, the search relevance conference, is confirmed for 29th & 30th > >>> April 2020 in Charlottesville, Virginia - the C

Re: Haystack CFP is open, come and tell us how you tune relevance for Lucene/Solr

: Hi all, Haystack, the search relevance conference, is confirmed for 29th & 30th April 2020 in Charlottesville, Virginia - the CFP is open and we need your contributions! More information at www.haystackconf.com <http://www.haystackconf.com>including links to previous talks, deadline is 31st

Re: Haystack CFP is open, come and tell us how you tune relevance for Lucene/Solr

ed for 29th & 30th > > April 2020 in Charlottesville, Virginia - the CFP is open and we need > > your contributions! More information at www.haystackconf.com > > <http://www.haystackconf.com>including links to previous talks, deadline > > is 31st January. We'

Re: Haystack CFP is open, come and tell us how you tune relevance for Lucene/Solr

ed for 29th & 30th > April 2020 in Charlottesville, Virginia - the CFP is open and we need > your contributions! More information at www.haystackconf.com > <http://www.haystackconf.com>including links to previous talks, deadline > is 31st January. We'd love to hear your

Haystack CFP is open, come and tell us how you tune relevance for Lucene/Solr

e is 31st January. We'd love to hear your Lucene/Solr relevance stories. Cheers Charlie -- Charlie Hull Flax - Open Source Enterprise Search tel/fax: +44 (0)8700 118334 mobile: +44 (0)7767 825828 web: www.flax.co.uk

Lucene/Solr swag

If you are interested, Apache Comdev team added Lucene and Solr items to RedBubble: Lucene: https://www.redbubble.com/people/comdev/works/40953165-apache-lucene?asc=u Solr: https://www.redbubble.com/people/comdev/works/40952682-apache-solr?asc=u

Re: Query of Death Lucene/Solr 7.6

---Original message- > > From:Michael Gibney > > Sent: Friday 22nd February 2019 17:22 > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Query of Death Lucene/Solr 7.6 > > > > Ah... I think there are two issues likely at play here. One is LUCENE-8531 > > &

RE: Query of Death Lucene/Solr 7.6

ary 2019 17:22 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Query of Death Lucene/Solr 7.6 > > Ah... I think there are two issues likely at play here. One is LUCENE-8531 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8531>, which reverts a bug > related to SpanNearQuer

Re: Query of Death Lucene/Solr 7.6

ce SOLR-12243 is new in 7.6, does anyone know that SOLR-12243 could > > have this side-effect? > > > > Thanks, > > Markus > > > > > > -Original message- > > > From:Michael Gibney > > > Sent: Friday 8th February 2019 17:19 > >

Re: Query of Death Lucene/Solr 7.6

ns the problem on or off. > > Since SOLR-12243 is new in 7.6, does anyone know that SOLR-12243 could > have this side-effect? > > Thanks, > Markus > > > -Original message- > > From:Michael Gibney > > Sent: Friday 8th February 2019 17:19 > > To:

RE: Query of Death Lucene/Solr 7.6

, does anyone know that SOLR-12243 could have this side-effect? Thanks, Markus -Original message- > From:Michael Gibney > Sent: Friday 8th February 2019 17:19 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Query of Death Lucene/Solr 7.6 > > Hi Markus, > As of 7.

NYC Apache Lucene/Solr User Group: Call for Speakers

Hello, everyone! The New York Apache Lucene/Solr User Group <https://www.meetup.com/NYC-Apache-Lucene-Solr-Meetup/> is, for the first time, sending out a call for speakers for 2019/20. We have a great line up of speakers for this year, but we also want to hear more from the community. No

Re: Query of Death Lucene/Solr 7.6

Hi Markus, As of 7.6, LUCENE-8531 reverted a graph/Spans-based phrase query implementation (introduced in 6.5 -- LUCENE-7699 ) to an implementation that builds a separate phrase query for each pos

Query of Death Lucene/Solr 7.6

Hello (apologies for cross-posting), While working on SOLR-12743, using 7.6 on two nodes and 7.2.1 on the remaining four, we stumbled upon a situation where the 7.6 nodes quickly succumb when a 'Query-of-Death' is issued, 7.2.1 up to 7.5 are all unaffected (tested and confirmed). Following Smi

Lucene Solr custom tokenizer - How to include delimiter special characters as tokens?

Hello Solr users, I have a need to write a tokenizer for source code files in Solr, but don't have the option of including custom JARs. So for ex: Input: foo.bar Tokens: 'foo', '.', 'bar' How can I have a custom tokenizer or filter in schema.xml that can split on some characters, but also not d

Re: [OT] Lucene/Solr bug list caused by JVM's implementations

Christopher The Lucene devs in particular already are, thanks. On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Erick, > > On 8/15/18 12:56 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: >> Also note that the OpenJDK devs regularly get to test very

Re: [OT] Lucene/Solr bug list caused by JVM's implementations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Erick, On 8/15/18 12:56 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Also note that the OpenJDK devs regularly get to test very early > (unreleased) Java versions, which flushes out a lot of issues long > before a general release of Java We (dev@tomcat) get e

Re: Lucene/Solr bug list caused by JVM's implementations

Also note that the OpenJDK devs regularly get to test very early (unreleased) Java versions, which flushes out a lot of issues long before a general release of Java On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:25 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 8/14/2018 8:07 PM, Yasufumi Mizoguchi wrote: >> >> I am looking for Lu

Re: Lucene/Solr bug list caused by JVM's implementations

On 8/14/2018 8:07 PM, Yasufumi Mizoguchi wrote: I am looking for Lucene/Solr's bug list caused by JVM's implementations. And I found the following, but it seems not to be updated. https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/JavaBugs Where can I check the latest one? That is the only such list that I'm

Lucene/Solr bug list caused by JVM's implementations

Hi, I am looking for Lucene/Solr's bug list caused by JVM's implementations. And I found the following, but it seems not to be updated. https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/JavaBugs Where can I check the latest one? Thanks, Yasufumi

Re: Lucene/Solr Git Mirrors 5 day lag behind SVN?

I added a comment on the INFRA issue. I don't understand why it periodically "gets stuck". Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Kevin Risden wrote: > It looks like both Apache Git mirror (git://git.apache.org/lucene-solr.git) > and GitHub mirror (ht

Lucene/Solr Git Mirrors 5 day lag behind SVN?

It looks like both Apache Git mirror (git://git.apache.org/lucene-solr.git) and GitHub mirror (https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr.git) are 5 days behind SVN. This seems to have happened before: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9182 Is this a known issue? Kevin Risden

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

to DocValuesFacets when facet method is FC, >> what >> > > used >> > > >> to >> > > >> >>> be >> > > >> >>> > >> > FieldCache I believe. DocValuesFacets either uses >> > DocValues >>

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

t; > > >> >>> > >> > using the UninvertingReader. > > > >> >>> > >> > > > > >> >>> > >> > > > >> >>> > >> Ah.. got it. Thanks for reminding this details.It seems > like > >

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

ils.It seems like > > even > > >> >>> > >> docValues=true doesn't help with your custom implementation. > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > > >

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> Ah.. got it. Thanks for reminding this details.It seems like >> even >> >> >>> > >> docValues=true doesn't help with your custom implementation. >> >> >>> > &g

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

t;> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > > >> >>> > >> > I am not seeing a clean extension point to add a custom > >> >>> > >> UninvertingReader > >> >>> > >> > to S

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

; >> > >> >>> > >> Sadly, yes. There is no proper extension point. Also, consider >> >>> > overriding >> >>> > >> SolrIndexSearcher.wrapReader(SolrCore, DirectoryReader) where the >> >>> > >> particular

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

er extension point. Also, consider > >>> > overriding > >>> > >> SolrIndexSearcher.wrapReader(SolrCore, DirectoryReader) where the > >>> > >> particular UninvertingReader is created, there you can pass the > own > >>> one, > >>> > >

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > I don't think there is a way to do this now. Maybe we should separate the > logic of creating the SolrIndexSearcher to a factory. That should probably be extended down to where lucene creates searchers as well (delete-by-query). Rig

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

;> > >> which refers to custom FieldCache. >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> > On Aug 25, 2015 12:42 AM, "Mikhail Khludnev" < >>> > >> mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> >>> > >> > wrote: >

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

; > >> > >> > >> > > Hello Jamie, >> > >> > > I don't understand how it could choose DocValuesFacets (it >> occurs on >> > >> > > docValues=true) field, but then switches to >> > >> UninvertingReader/

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Hello Jamie, > > >> > > I don't understand how it could choose DocValuesFacets (it occurs > on > > >> > > docValues=true) field, but then switches to > > >> UninvertingReader/FieldCache > >

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

lo Jamie, > >> > > I don't understand how it could choose DocValuesFacets (it occurs on > >> > > docValues=true) field, but then switches to > >> UninvertingReader/FieldCache > >> > > which means docValues=false. If you can provide more detai

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

ovide more details it would >> be >> > > great. >> > > Beside of that, I suppose you can only implement and inject your own >> > > UninvertingReader, I don't think there is an extension point for this. >> > It's >> > > too speci

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

I don't think there is an extension point for this. > > It's > > > too specific requirement. > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Jamie Johnson > > wrote: > > > > > > > as mentioned in a previous email I have a need to pro

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

> > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Jamie Johnson > wrote: > > > > > as mentioned in a previous email I have a need to provide security > > controls > > > at the term level. I know that Lucene/Solr doesn't support this so I > had > &g

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

oint for this. It's > too specific requirement. > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote: > > > as mentioned in a previous email I have a need to provide security > controls > > at the term level. I know that Lucene/Solr doesn't support this so I had

Re: Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

nject your own UninvertingReader, I don't think there is an extension point for this. It's too specific requirement. On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote: > as mentioned in a previous email I have a need to provide security controls > at the term level. I know tha

Lucene/Solr 5.0 and custom FieldCahe implementation

as mentioned in a previous email I have a need to provide security controls at the term level. I know that Lucene/Solr doesn't support this so I had baked something onto a 4.x baseline that was sufficient for my use cases. I am now looking to move that implementation to 5.x and am running in

Lucene/Solr Revolution 2015 Voting

Hey Folks, If you're interested in going to Lucene/Solr Revolution this year in Austin, please vote for the sessions you would like to see! https://lucenerevolution.uservoice.com/ -Yonik

Lucene/Solr Revolution 2015 - Austin Oct 13-16 - CFP ends next Week

(cross posted, please confine any replies to general@lucene) A quick reminder and/or heads up for htose who haven't heard yet: this year's Lucene/Solr Revolution is happeing in Austin Texas in October. The CFP and Early bird registration are currently open. (CFP ends May 8, Early

Re: New Meetup in London - Lucene/Solr User Group

Would LOVE to see the results (assuming you can ensure the same fruit(s?) are being compared) Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > On 1

Re: New Meetup in London - Lucene/Solr User Group

On 18 November 2014 11:41, Charlie Hull wrote: > presenting some results of a Solr/Elasticsearch comparative performance > study. I was asked about that a couple of times at the Solr Revolution conference. Looking forward to seeing the results. Regards, Alex. Personal: http://www.outerthough

Re: New Meetup in London - Lucene/Solr User Group

On 27/10/2014 14:25, Charlie Hull wrote: Hi all, We noticed that there isn't a Lucene/Solr user group in London (although there is an Elasticsearch user group) - so we decided to start one! http://www.meetup.com/Apache-Lucene-Solr-London-User-Group Please join if you're interested a

Re: New Meetup in London - Lucene/Solr User Group

tter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 On 27 October 2014 10:25, Charlie Hull wrote: > Hi all, > > We noticed that there isn't a Lucene/Solr user group in London (although > there is an Elasticsearch use

New Meetup in London - Lucene/Solr User Group

Hi all, We noticed that there isn't a Lucene/Solr user group in London (although there is an Elasticsearch user group) - so we decided to start one! http://www.meetup.com/Apache-Lucene-Solr-London-User-Group Please join if you're interested and do pass the word. Our first meetin

Re: [ANN] SIREn, a Lucene/Solr plugin for rich JSON data search

; On Jul 23, 2014, at 7:13 AM, Renaud Delbru wrote: >> >> One of the coolest features of Lucene/Solr is its ability to index nested >> documents using a Blockjoin approach. >> >> While this works well for small documents and document collections, it >>

Re: [ANN] SIREn, a Lucene/Solr plugin for rich JSON data search

Querying nested data is very difficult in any modern db that I have seen. If It works as you suggest then It would be cool if the feature was it going to be eventually maintained inside solr. > On Jul 23, 2014, at 7:13 AM, Renaud Delbru wrote: > > One of the coolest features of Lucen

[ANN] SIREn, a Lucene/Solr plugin for rich JSON data search

One of the coolest features of Lucene/Solr is its ability to index nested documents using a Blockjoin approach. While this works well for small documents and document collections, it becomes unsustainable for larger ones: Blockjoin works by splitting the original document in many documents

ANNOUNCE: Lucene/Solr @ ApacheCon (Denver, April 7-9)

(cross posted, please keep any replies to general@lucene) ApacheCon Denver is coming up and registration is currently open. In addition to a solid 3 day track of Lucene & Solr related talks, there are also some post confrence events that are open to anyone even if you don't a

Re: Indexing multiple files in Lucene Solr

ahoo.com; erickerick...@gmail.com > Subject: Indexing multiple files in Lucene Solr > > > > > Hi Yuri and Erick, > > > > Saw your posting in the Lucene Solr mail archives about trying to index > multiple documents with the same id without having the original document

RE: Indexing multiple files in Lucene Solr

From: Anita Nair (UST, IND) Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 12:38 PM To: yuryk...@yahoo.com; erickerick...@gmail.com Subject: Indexing multiple files in Lucene Solr Hi Yuri and Erick, Saw your posting in the Lucene Solr mail archives about trying to index multiple documents

AW: Lucene/Solr 4.5.1 svn tag

Thanks, Mark!

Re: Lucene/Solr 4.5.1 svn tag

I had created it in a ‘retired’ location. The tag should be in the correction spot now. Thanks! - Mark On Oct 25, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > I’ll look into it. I ran the command to create the tag, but perhaps it did > not ‘take’ :) > > - Mark > > On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:56 PM, An

Re: Lucene/Solr 4.5.1 svn tag

I’ll look into it. I ran the command to create the tag, but perhaps it did not ‘take’ :) - Mark On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:56 PM, André Widhani wrote: > Hi, > > shouldn't there be a tag for the 4.5.1 release under > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/ ? > > Or am I looking at the wr

Lucene/Solr 4.5.1 svn tag

Hi, shouldn't there be a tag for the 4.5.1 release under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/ ? Or am I looking at the wrong place? Regards, André

ANNOUNCE: Lucene/Solr Revolution EU 2013 - Session List & Early Bird Pricing

(NOTE: cross-posted to various lists, please reply only to general@lucene w/ any questions or follow ups) Hey folks, 2 announcements regarding the upcoming Lucene/Solr Revolution EU 2013 in Dublin (November 4-7)... ## 1) Session List Now Posted I'd like to thank everyone who helped

ANNOUNCE: Lucene/Solr Revolution EU 2013: Registration & Community Voting

(NOTE: cross-posted to various lists, please reply only to general@lucene w/ any questions or follow ups) 2 Announcements folks should be aware of regarding the upcoming Lucene/Solr Revolution EU 2013 in Dublin... # 1) Registration Now Open Registration is now open for Lucene/Solr

Re: short-circuit OR operator in lucene/solr

Sweet! On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > function queries to the rescue! > > q={!func}def(query($a),query($b),query($c)) > a=field1:value1 > b=field2:value2 > c=field3:value3 > > "def" or default function returns the value of the first argument that > matches. It's named d

Re: short-circuit OR operator in lucene/solr

Deepak, I think your goal is to gain something in speed, but most likely the function query will be slower than the query without score computation (the filter query) - this stems from the fact how the query is executed, but I may, of course, be wrong. Would you mind sharing measurements you make?

Re: short-circuit OR operator in lucene/solr

function queries to the rescue! q={!func}def(query($a),query($b),query($c)) a=field1:value1 b=field2:value2 c=field3:value3 "def" or default function returns the value of the first argument that matches. It's named default because it's more commonly used like def(popularity,50) (return the valu

Re: short-circuit OR operator in lucene/solr

Short answer, no - it has zero sense. But after some thinking, it can make some sense, potentially. DisjunctionSumScorer holds child scorers semi-ordered in a binary heap. Hypothetically inequality can be enforced at that heap, but heap might not work anymore for such alignment. Hence, instead of

short-circuit OR operator in lucene/solr

I understand that lucene's AND (&&), OR (||) and NOT (!) operators are shorthands for REQUIRED, OPTIONAL and EXCLUDE respectively, which is why one can't treat them as boolean operators (adhering to boolean algebra). I have been trying to construct a simple OR expression, as follows q = +(field1:

ANNOUNCE: CFP Lucene/Solr Revolution EU 2013 (Deadline August 2nd)

(NOTE: cross-posted to variuous lists, please reply only to general@lucene w/ any questions or follow ups) The Call for Papers for Lucene/Solr Revolution EU 2013 is currently open. http://www.lucenerevolution.org/2013/call-for-papers Lucene/Solr Revolution is the biggest open source

[ANN] Lucene/SOLR hackday in Cambridge, UK

Hi all, Flax is running a Lucene/SOLR hack day here in Cambridge on Friday, 26th July, with committer and LucidWorks co-founder Grant Ingersoll. We'll provide the venue, some food and the internet - you provide enthusiasm and great ideas for hacking! Details here: http://www.meetu

Re: Content based recommender using lucene/solr

(Mahout) and combined it with Content > Similarity-based engine (wasn't Solr/Lucene, but something custom that > worked with ngrams, but it may have as well been Lucene/Solr/ES). It > worked well. If you haven't worked with Mahout before I'd suggest the > approach in

Re: Content based recommender using lucene/solr

Hi, It doesn't have to be one or the other. In the past I've built a news recommender engine based on CF (Mahout) and combined it with Content Similarity-based engine (wasn't Solr/Lucene, but something custom that worked with ngrams, but it may have as well been Lucene/Solr/ES).

Re: Content based recommender using lucene/solr

that does exactly this :) >> >> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/Mahout-Quality/javadoc/org/apache/mahout/cf/taste/hadoop/similarity/item/ItemSimilarityJob.html >> >> You can use mahout in distributed and non-distributed mode as well. >> >>> From: lcgu

Re: Content based recommender using lucene/solr

distributed and non-distributed mode as well. >> >> > From: lcguerreroc...@gmail.com >> > Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:16:57 -0500 >> > Subject: Content based recommender using lucene/solr >> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; java-u...@lucene.apache.org >&

RE: Content based recommender using lucene/solr

? > From: lcguerreroc...@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:02:00 -0500 > Subject: Re: Content based recommender using lucene/solr > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > CC: java-u...@lucene.apache.org > > Hey saikat, thanks for your suggestion. I've looked into mahout an

Re: Content based recommender using lucene/solr

uilds.apache.org/job/Mahout-Quality/javadoc/org/apache/mahout/cf/taste/hadoop/similarity/item/ItemSimilarityJob.html > > You can use mahout in distributed and non-distributed mode as well. > > > From: lcguerreroc...@gmail.com > > Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:16:57 -0500 > &g

RE: Content based recommender using lucene/solr

as well. > From: lcguerreroc...@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:16:57 -0500 > Subject: Content based recommender using lucene/solr > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; java-u...@lucene.apache.org > > Hi, > > I'm using lucene and solr right now in a production e

Content based recommender using lucene/solr

Hi, I'm using lucene and solr right now in a production environment with an index of about a million docs. I'm working on a recommender that basically would list the n most similar items to the user based on the current item he is viewing. I've been thinking of using solr/lucene since I already h

Re: Lucene/Solr Filesystem tunings

erformance with ext3 over ext4 around > commits/fsync. Test were actually enough slower (lots of these operations), > that I made a special ext3 partition workspace for lucene/solr dev. (Still > use ext4 for root and home). > > Have not checked that recently, and it may not be a

Re: Lucene/Solr Filesystem tunings

ition workspace for lucene/solr dev. (Still use ext4 for root and home). Have not checked that recently, and it may not be a large concern for many use cases. - Mark On Jun 4, 2013, at 6:48 PM, Tim Vaillancourt wrote: > Hey all, > > Does anyone have any advice or special filesytem t

Re: Lucene/Solr Filesystem tunings

e xfs. Want to > run some benchmarks and publish the results? :) > > Otis > -- > Solr & ElasticSearch Support > http://sematext.com/ > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Tim Vaillancourt > wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > Does anyon

Re: Lucene/Solr Filesystem tunings

Tim Vaillancourt wrote: > Hey all, > > Does anyone have any advice or special filesytem tuning to share for > Lucene/Solr, and which file systems they like more? > > Also, does Lucene/Solr care about access times if I turn them off (I think I > doesn't care)? > > A bit unre

Lucene/Solr Filesystem tunings

Hey all, Does anyone have any advice or special filesytem tuning to share for Lucene/Solr, and which file systems they like more? Also, does Lucene/Solr care about access times if I turn them off (I think I doesn't care)? A bit unrelated: What are people's opinions on red

Re: Bangalore Apache Lucene/Solr meetup

Just an update, the it has been rescheduled due to some venue availability related issues and is now on the 8th of June. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > Hi folks, > > We just created a new meetup group for all Lucene/Solr enthusiasts in and > around Bang

Bangalore Apache Lucene/Solr meetup

Hi folks, We just created a new meetup group for all Lucene/Solr enthusiasts in and around Bangalore. We're holding our first meetup on the 1st Of June, 2013. Link to the meetup page - http://www.meetup.com/Bangalore-Apache-Solr-Lucene-Group/ . Feel free to join. Here's the link to

Re: Lucene-Solr indexing document via Post method

-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Lucene-Solr indexing document via Post method Hi guys, I'm trying to run solr with apache tomcat. So, It's possible to indexing documents via Post method, using Lucene-Solr ? Which is the correct way to index documents in Solr ? thanks

Lucene-Solr indexing document via Post method

Hi guys, I'm trying to run solr with apache tomcat. So, It's possible to indexing documents via Post method, using Lucene-Solr ? Which is the correct way to index documents in Solr ? thanks

RE: [WEBINAR] - "Lucene/Solr 4 - A Revolution in Enterprise Search Technology"

: [WEBINAR] - "Lucene/Solr 4 - A Revolution in Enterprise Search Technology" Excuse the blatant marketing, though for the benefit of the community... <http://programs.lucidworks.com/Solr4032013_signuppage.html> Join me tomorrow/today (March 27) for a webinar on what's new an

[WEBINAR] - "Lucene/Solr 4 – A Revolution in Enterprise Search Technology"

reak the webinar system by overloading it for the presentation! (and it'll be recorded and shared afterwards with those that registered) Erik -- [official description] Lucene/Solr 4 is a ground breaking shift from previous releases. Solr 4.0 dramatically improves sca

Re: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr

And alternatively, http://yonik.com/solr/getting-started/ - Mark On Mar 5, 2013, at 6:59 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Hi, > > See http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html :) > > Otis > -- > Solr & ElasticSearch Support > http://sematext.com/ > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:52 AM

Re: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr

arium as a PHP library is great, right now it lack's of > solr4 support, but for solr 3.6 it's great. > > - Mensaje original - > De: "David Quarterman" > Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Enviados: Martes, 5 de Marzo 2013 10:56:18 > Asunto: RE: Bu

Re: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr

iginal - De: "David Quarterman" Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Enviados: Martes, 5 de Marzo 2013 10:56:18 Asunto: RE: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr Hi Alvaro, I agree with Otis & Alexandre (esp. Windows + PHP!). However, there are plenty of people using Solr &

Re: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr

some example usage. > > Regards, > > DQ > > > > From: Álvaro Vargas Quezada [mailto:al...@outlook.com] > Sent: 05 March 2013 14:53 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr > > > > Hi everyone! > > &

RE: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr

Regards, DQ From: Álvaro Vargas Quezada [mailto:al...@outlook.com] Sent: 05 March 2013 14:53 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr Hi everyone! I'm trying to develop a central index, I installed Solr and I reach the screen that I attach.

Re: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr

Mar 2013 09:59:17 -0500 > > Subject: Re: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr > > From: otis.gospodne...@gmail.com > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > > Hi, > > > > See http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html :) > > > > Otis &

Re: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr

Mar 2013 09:59:17 -0500 > > Subject: Re: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr > > From: otis.gospodne...@gmail.com > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > > Hi, > > > > See http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html :) > > > > Otis > >

RE: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr

g a central index with Lucene + Solr > From: otis.gospodne...@gmail.com > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Hi, > > See http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html :) > > Otis > -- > Solr & ElasticSearch Support > http://sematext.com/ > > > >

Re: Building a central index with Lucene + Solr

Hi, See http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html :) Otis -- Solr & ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Álvaro Vargas Quezada wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I'm trying to develop a central index, I installed Solr and I reach the > screen that I attach. Bu

  1   2   3   >