s in the config files might be impacting this
behavior...but one thing at a time I suppose.
Thanks.
Peter S. Lee
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 4:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Looking to see if solrj 3.5 co
but one thing at a time I suppose.
Thanks.
Peter S. Lee
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 4:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Looking to see if solrj 3.5 could be used with solr server 4.2.1
On 5/14/2013 1:44 PM, Lee,
On 5/14/2013 1:44 PM, Lee, Peter wrote:
> The cause:
> We had an unintentional case that occurred through one request handler such
> that after the query was processed through the RH and the parameters were
> set, there were fq variables set but no actual "q" (query) param.
> - Under solr 3.5
essage-
> From: Robert J.
Haschart [mailto:rh...@virginia.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 11:29
PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Looking to see if
solrj 3.5 could be used with solr server 4.2.1
>
> Peter,
>
> In the
work I have done for the project SolrMarc, wh
S. Lee
-Original Message-
From: Robert J. Haschart [mailto:rh...@virginia.edu]
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 11:29 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Looking to see if solrj 3.5 could be used with solr server 4.2.1
Peter,
In the work I have done for the project SolrMarc, which
ograg.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 1:22 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Looking to see if solrj 3.5 could be used with solr server
4.2.1
On 5/11/2013 9:36 PM, Lee, Peter wrote:
I've reviewed all of the release notes and we've been doing testing to see
if solrj that
unday, May 12, 2013 10:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Lee, Peter
Subject: Re: Looking to see if solrj 3.5 could be used with solr server 4.2.1
On 5/11/2013 11:36 PM, Lee, Peter wrote:
> If you have any information regarding whether or not this might work (as in
> "yeah, we
Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 1:22 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Looking to see if solrj 3.5 could be used with solr server 4.2.1
On 5/11/2013 9:36 PM, Lee, Peter wrote:
> I've reviewed all of the release notes and we've been doing testing
On 5/11/2013 11:36 PM, Lee, Peter wrote:
If you have any information regarding whether or not this might work (as in "yeah, we did that and
it worked okay"...or..."no, that won't work because protocol XYZ changed between versions and
") I would appreciate it. As stated above, simple cases using
On 5/11/2013 11:22 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> Initial note: There might be a showstopper with commit. I'm building a
> test program now to see.
Everything was fine with my test code:
String url = "http://host:port/solr/core";;
SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(url);
On 5/11/2013 9:36 PM, Lee, Peter wrote:
> I've reviewed all of the release notes and we've been doing testing to see if
> solrj that came with solr 3.5 would work with solr server 4.2.1. We are not
> using any of the new features of 4.2.1...we upgraded purely for the improved
> performance and m
I've reviewed all of the release notes and we've been doing testing to see if
solrj that came with solr 3.5 would work with solr server 4.2.1. We are not
using any of the new features of 4.2.1...we upgraded purely for the improved
performance and much smaller memory footprint of the indexes. Whi
12 matches
Mail list logo
