Michael, Thanks for the information. We are tracking down an issue now that might be related...but we are far from having determined that yet. Either way I'll let you know how it turns out.
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Sokolov [mailto:msoko...@safaribooksonline.com] Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 10:34 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Lee, Peter Subject: Re: Looking to see if solrj 3.5 could be used with solr server 4.2.1 On 5/11/2013 11:36 PM, Lee, Peter wrote: > If you have any information regarding whether or not this might work (as in > "yeah, we did that and it worked okay"...or..."no, that won't work because > protocol XYZ changed between versions and <yada,yada,yada>") I would > appreciate it. As stated above, simple cases using both exact match and > analyzed fields have been shown to work. We are already investigating the > more involved cases, but I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask for the input of > the solr community. > > With much appreciation, > > Peter S. Lee Peter - I ran some simple tests of 3.4 client and 4.2 server and didn't hit any problems. However, this isn't in production yet, and I haven't had a chance to test extensively. I would certainly be interested to hear if you run into any problems. Our plan is to upgrade the clients first, so I was more interested in testing 4.2 client/3.4 server. There was one issue there, but I think there is a pretty straightforward workaround (see the recent discussion w/Shawn). -Mike
