On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Yao Ge wrote:
> Having a large number of fields is not the same as having a large number of
> facets. To facets are something you would display to users as aid for query
> refinement or navigation. There is no way for a user to use 3700 facets at
> the same time.
I
Having a large number of fields is not the same as having a large number of
facets. To facets are something you would display to users as aid for query
refinement or navigation. There is no way for a user to use 3700 facets at
the same time. So it more of question on how to determine what facets t
We are using 1.3.0. Thanks for the suggestion. Will see if I can try one of
the ngihtly builds.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> What version of Solr? Try a nightly build if you're at Solr 1.3 or
> earlier and you'll be amazed at the difference.
>
>Erik
>
>
> On Ju
What version of Solr? Try a nightly build if you're at Solr 1.3 or
earlier and you'll be amazed at the difference.
Erik
On Jul 31, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Rahul R wrote:
In a production environment, having the caches enabled makes a lot
of sense.
And most definitely we will be enabling
In a production environment, having the caches enabled makes a lot of sense.
And most definitely we will be enabling them. However, the primary idea of
this exercise is to verify if limiting the number of facets will actually
improve the performance.
An update on this. I did verify and looks like
On Jul 31, 2009, at 7:17 AM, Rahul R wrote:
Erik,
I understand that caching is going to improve performance. Infact we
did a
PSR run with caches enabled and we got awesome results. But these
wouldn't
be really representative because the PSR scripts will be doing the
same
searches again an
Erik,
I understand that caching is going to improve performance. Infact we did a
PSR run with caches enabled and we got awesome results. But these wouldn't
be really representative because the PSR scripts will be doing the same
searches again and again. These would be cached and there would be virt
On Jul 31, 2009, at 2:35 AM, Rahul R wrote:
Hello,
We are trying to get Solr to work for a really huge parts database.
Details
of the database
- 55 million parts
- Totally 3700 properties (facets). But each record will not have
value for
all properties.
- Most of these facets are defined
Hello,
We are trying to get Solr to work for a really huge parts database. Details
of the database
- 55 million parts
- Totally 3700 properties (facets). But each record will not have value for
all properties.
- Most of these facets are defined as dynamic fields within the Solr Index
We were getti
