t;
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:45:08 PM
Subject: Re: Integrated Spellchecking
That unfortunately got pushed aside to work on some of our higher
priority solr work since we already had it working one way.
Hoping to revisit this after we push to productio
Allocating some time to this next week. Need to try and remember what issues I was having when I
stopped working on it.
doug
Matthew Runo wrote:
I'd have to agree with this. I'd probably be able to put a bit of work
into it as well, as it's something we'd use for sure if it were available.
ROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:45:08 PM
Subject: Re: Integrated Spellchecking
That unfortunately got pushed aside to work on some of our higher priority solr
work since we
already had it working one way.
Hoping to revisit this after we push to
,
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Doug Steigerwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:45:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Integrated Spellchecking
>
> That unfort
I'd have to agree with this. I'd probably be able to put a bit of work
into it as well, as it's something we'd use for sure if it were
available.
Thanks!
Matthew Runo
Software Developer
Zappos.com
702.943.7833
On Feb 18, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Hey Doug,
If you have perm
Hey Doug,
If you have permission to donate, perhaps you can just post the patch
anyway and state that it isn't quite ready to go. This is something I
could use too, and so may have some cycles to work on it. I hate to
replicate the work if you already have something that is more or less
That unfortunately got pushed aside to work on some of our higher priority solr work since we
already had it working one way.
Hoping to revisit this after we push to production and start working on new features and share what
I've done for this and multicore/spellcheck replication (which we hav
e exists for the spell checker?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Grant
>>>
>
>
So have you succeeded in implementing this patch? I'd definitely like to use
this functionality as a search suggestion.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Integrated-Spellchecking-tp14930232p15504125.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Jan 17, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Doug Steigerwald wrote:
I've got a couple search components for automatic spell correction
that I've been working on.
I've converted most of the SpellCheckerRequestHandler to a search
component (hopefully will throw a patch out soon for this). Then
another s
I've got a couple search components for automatic spell correction that I've
been working on.
I've converted most of the SpellCheckerRequestHandler to a search component (hopefully will throw a
patch out soon for this). Then another search component that will do auto correction for a query if
On Jan 17, 2008 2:33 PM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes -- this is what search components are for!
>
> Depending on where you put it in the chain, it could only return spell
> checked results if there are too few results (or the top score is below
> some threshold)
Score thresholds
Yes -- this is what search components are for!
Depending on where you put it in the chain, it could only return spell
checked results if there are too few results (or the top score is below
some threshold)
ryan
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Is it feasible to submit a query to any of the various ha
Is it feasible to submit a query to any of the various handlers and
have it bring back results and spelling suggestions all in one
response? Is this something the query components piece would handle,
assuming one exists for the spell checker?
Thanks,
Grant
13 matches
Mail list logo
