Hey Doug, You have multicore/spellcheck replication going already? We have been working on the replication for multicore. Sounds like we are.... replicating each others work. When will you be able to attach your stuff to JIRA issue? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-433 Thanks, Otis
-- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: Doug Steigerwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:45:08 PM > Subject: Re: Integrated Spellchecking > > That unfortunately got pushed aside to work on some of our higher priority > solr > work since we > already had it working one way. > > Hoping to revisit this after we push to production and start working on new > features and share what > I've done for this and multicore/spellcheck replication (which we have > working > quite well in QA > right now). > > Doug Steigerwald > Software Developer > McClatchy Interactive > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 919.861.1287 > > > oleg_gnatovskiy wrote: > > > > > > dsteiger wrote: > >> I've got a couple search components for automatic spell correction that > >> I've been working on. > >> > >> I've converted most of the SpellCheckerRequestHandler to a search > >> component (hopefully will throw a > >> patch out soon for this). Then another search component that will do auto > >> correction for a query if > >> the search returns zero results. > >> > >> We're hoping to see some performance improvements out of handling this in > >> Solr instead of our Rails > >> service. > >> > >> doug > >> > >> > >> Ryan McKinley wrote: > >>> Yes -- this is what search components are for! > >>> > >>> Depending on where you put it in the chain, it could only return spell > >>> checked results if there are too few results (or the top score is below > >>> some threshold) > >>> > >>> ryan > >>> > >>> > >>> Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >>>> Is it feasible to submit a query to any of the various handlers and > >>>> have it bring back results and spelling suggestions all in one > >>>> response? Is this something the query components piece would handle, > >>>> assuming one exists for the spell checker? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Grant > >>>> > >> > > > > > > So have you succeeded in implementing this patch? I'd definitely like to use > > this functionality as a search suggestion. >
