Re: Indexing non-stored fields

2014-06-30 Thread tomasv
rue'" > >> fields > >>> but not the "stored='false'" fields. > >>> > >>> Am I interpreting this correctly? or am I missing something? > >> > >> Fields that are not stored simply mean that they will not be returned >

Re: Indexing non-stored fields

2014-06-30 Thread Steve McKay
27;" >> fields >>> but not the "stored='false'" fields. >>> >>> Am I interpreting this correctly? or am I missing something? >> >> Fields that are not stored simply mean that they will not be returned in >> search results.

Re: Indexing non-stored fields

2014-06-30 Thread tomasv
at are not stored simply mean that they will not be returned in > search results. If they are indexed, then you will be able to search on > those fields. > > This should be the case before or after a restart. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > > > > > -- >

Re: Indexing non-stored fields

2014-06-30 Thread Shawn Heisey
> Hello All, (warning: newbie question) > > In our schema.xml we have defined many fields such as: > > > Other fields are defined as this: > > > Q: If my server is restarted/ rebooted, will I still be able to search for > documents using the "firstname" field? Or will my records need to be > re-i

Indexing non-stored fields

2014-06-30 Thread tomasv
rough the wiki) -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-non-stored-fields-tp4144893.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.