Thank you Very much for that explanation. Well done!
-tomas
On Jun 30, 2014 5:55 PM, "Steve McKay-4 [via Lucene]" <
ml-node+s472066n4144902...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:

> Stored doesn't mean "stored to disk", more like "stored verbatim". When
> you index a field, Solr analyzes the field value and makes it part of the
> index. The index is persisted to disk when you commit, which is why it
> sticks around after a restart. Searching the index, mapping from search
> terms to doc ids, is very fast. However, the index is very very bad at
> going in reverse, from doc ids to terms. That's where stored fields come
> in. When you store a field, Solr takes the field value and stores the
> entire value separate from the index. This makes it trivial to get the
> value for a particular doc id, but it's terrible for searching.
>
> So the stored attribute and the indexed attribute have different purposes.
> Indexed means you want to be able to search on the value, and stored means
> you want to be able to see the value in search results.
>
> On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:15 PM, tomasv <[hidden email]
> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4144902&i=0>> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the quick response.
> >
> > Follow-up newbie question:
> > If the fields are not stored, how is the server able to search for them
> > after a restart? Where does it get the data to be searched?
> >
> > Example:  "bob" (firstname) is indexed but not stored. After initial
> > indexing, I query for "firstname:(bob)" and I get my document back. But
> if
> > I restart the server, where does the server go to retrieve information
> that
> > will allow me to query for "bob" once again? It would seem that "bob"
> got
> > stored someplace if I can query on it after a restart.
> >
> > My untrained mind thinks that searching for "firstname:(bob)" (after a
> > restart) will fail, but that searching for "recordid:(12345)" (in my
> > original example) will succeed since it was indexed+stored.
> >
> > (stored + indexed makes total sense to me; it's the indexed but NOT
> stored
> > that I can't get my head around).
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Shawn Heisey-4 [via Lucene] <
> > [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4144902&i=1>>
> wrote:
> >
> >>> Hello All, (warning: newbie question)
> >>>
> >>> In our schema.xml we have defined many fields such as:
> >>> <field name="firstname" type="string" indexed="true" stored="false" />
> >>>
> >>> Other fields are defined as this:
> >>> <field name="recordid" type="long" indexed="true" stored="true" />
> >>>
> >>> Q: If my server is restarted/ rebooted, will I still be able to search
> >> for
> >>> documents using the "firstname" field? Or will my records need to be
> >>> re-indexed before I can search by first name?
> >>> It seems that after a re-boot, I can search for the "stored='true'"
> >> fields
> >>> but not the "stored='false'" fields.
> >>>
> >>> Am I interpreting this correctly? or am I missing something?
> >>
> >> Fields that are not stored simply mean that they will not be returned
> in
> >> search results. If they are indexed, then you will be able to search on
> >> those fields.
> >>
> >> This should be the case before or after a restart.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shawn
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion
> >> below:
> >>
> >>
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-non-stored-fields-tp4144893p4144894.html
> >> To unsubscribe from Indexing non-stored fields, click here
> >> <
> >> .
> >> NAML
> >> <
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > /*-----------------------
> > * Tomas at Home
> > * [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4144902&i=2>
> > * ---------------------*/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-non-stored-fields-tp4144893p4144895.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-non-stored-fields-tp4144893p4144902.html
>  To unsubscribe from Indexing non-stored fields, click here
> <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4144893&code=ZGFka2luZEBnbWFpbC5jb218NDE0NDg5M3wtMTcwMzcxNzM5Mg==>
> .
> NAML
> <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>




--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-non-stored-fields-tp4144893p4144904.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to