kenized
> for
> >> faceting (i.e. string) and upon selection the filter is added to the fq
> >> parameter in the Solr query. Let me know if that helps.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Darshan Pandya <
> darshanpan...@gmail.com
> >>
>> > Hello folks,
>> >
>> > I am fairly new to solr + banana, especially banana.
>> >
>> >
>> > I am trying to configure banana for faceted search for a collection in
>> > solr.
>> > I want to be able to have multiple facets parameters on
Hello folks,
I am fairly new to solr + banana, especially banana.
I am trying to configure banana for faceted search for a collection in
solr.
I want to be able to have multiple facets parameters on the left and see
the results of selections on my data table on the right. Exactly like
guided
t; >
> > I am fairly new to solr + banana, especially banana.
> >
> >
> > I am trying to configure banana for faceted search for a collection in
> > solr.
> > I want to be able to have multiple facets parameters on the left and see
> > the results of select
the Solr query. Let me know if that helps.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Darshan Pandya
wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I am fairly new to solr + banana, especially banana.
>
>
> I am trying to configure banana for faceted search for a collection in
> solr.
> I want to
Hey Alessandro,
Can you help me? :)
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Use-faceted-search-to-drill-down-in-hierarchical-structure-and-omit-node-data-outside-current-selectn-tp4219384p4220080.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
unt the number of ">" occurrences
in the "name" attribute to determine the actual level in the hierarchy.
Can you advice?
Thanks again!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Use-faceted-search-to-drill-down-in-hierarchical-structure
Hi Charlie,
Your solution seems to remove faceting capabilities...so that's not what I'm
looking for :) Thanks though!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Use-faceted-search-to-drill-down-in-hierarchical-structure-and-omit-node-data-outside-curre
e able to support drilling
down in categories using your suggested solution?
Just want to make sure I'm on the right track here :)
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Use-faceted-search-to-drill-down-in-hierarchical-structure-and-omit-node-data-outside-c
t; shirt> sleeveless shirt
AND also fall under:
Clothing
Clothing > shirt
Clothing > shirt> sleeveless shirt
Thanks again!
From: Alessandro Benedetti [via Lucene]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:26
To: PeterKerk
Subject: Re: Use faceted search to drill down in hierarchical structure
an
gt; Man > top > shirt
> Man > top > shirt> sleeveless shirt
>
> AND also fall under:
>
> Clothing
> Clothing > shirt
> Clothing > shirt> sleeveless shirt
>
> Thanks again!
>
> From: Alessandro Benedetti [via Lucene]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 2
8, 2015 10:26
To: PeterKerk
Subject: Re: Use faceted search to drill down in hierarchical structure and
omit node data outside current selection
The fact is that you are trying to model a hierarchical facet on documents
that actually index the content as a simple field.
What I would sugg
=slug_nl_0:taarttoppers&group=true&group.field=slug_nl_0`
>
> error: can not use FieldCache on multivalued field: slug_nl_0
>
> `&fq=slug_nl_0:taarttoppers&group.facet=true&group.field=slug_nl_0`
>
> error: Specify the group.field as parameter or local paramete
on a multi-valued field has not
> yet been implemented.
On that same Solr FieldCollapsing example page they refer to Best Buy as an
example. Now I wonder how that was implemented without support for
multivalued fields.
What can I do?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.4
Hi,
My name is Sergio Garcia.
I would be interested in this role. Attached you can find a copy of my CV.
Regards,
Sergio
On 31 January 2015 at 14:18, MKGoose wrote:
> We are looking for a remote / freelance consultant to work with us on a
> project related to Solr faceted search and N
We are looking for a remote / freelance consultant to work with us on a
project related to Solr faceted search and NLP. It involves data extraction
/ summarisation and custom faceted search on Solr.
Please contact me if you have expertise in this area and can work remotely
with a small team
Make that fq not facet.query. Does that do what you want?
Erik
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 00:40, Mayuri Laxman Gadsing wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using the faceted search in Solr. I wanted to know if there's a way to
> display selective records in the sublist
Hi all,
I'm using the faceted search in Solr. I wanted to know if there's a way to
display selective records in the sublist.
I've tried this query -
localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.pivot=city,jobtype&facet.field=jobtype&facet.query=jobtype:Tie
On 3/17/2014 9:25 AM, vit wrote:
We have a big Solr search application where I need to add a faceted search
for a certain request handler.
And it does not work whereas for "select" handler it does.
I tried to find something in the configuration but could not.
If possible, please l
We have a big Solr search application where I need to add a faceted search
for a certain request handler.
And it does not work whereas for "select" handler it does.
I tried to find something in the configuration but could not.
If possible, please let me know where I should look at t
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 23:59 +0100, Bing Hua wrote:
> I am going to evaluate some Lucene/Solr capabilities on handling faceted
> queries, in particular, with a single facet field that contains large number
> (say up to 1 million) of distinct values. Does anyone have some experience
> on how lucene p
to 1 million) of distinct values. Does anyone have some experience
>>> on how lucene performs in this scenario?
>>>
>>> e.g.
>>> Doc1 has tags A B C D
>>> Doc2 has tags B C D E
>>> etc etc millions of docs and there can be millions of
gs B C D E
>> etc etc millions of docs and there can be millions of distinct tag values.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Lucene-Faceted-Search-Too-Many-Unique-Values-tp4112860.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
>> (http://Nabble.com).
>>
>>
>
>
ext:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Lucene-Faceted-Search-Too-Many-Unique-Values-tp4112860.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
> (http://Nabble.com).
>
>
D
Doc2 has tags B C D E
etc etc millions of docs and there can be millions of distinct tag values.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Lucene-Faceted-Search-Too-Many-Unique-Values-tp4112860.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
If you don't want the facets sorted by decreasing count (the default),
you can specify
facet.sort=index
to get "index order" ((lexicographic by indexed term)
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.com -- making solr shine
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 2:08 PM, MC wrote:
> Hello,
> Here is a public API that uses f
Hello,
Here is a public API that uses facet fields:
http://golr.berkeleybop.org/select?qt=standard&fl=*&version=2.2&wt=json&indent=on&rows=0&facet=true&facet.field=type&q=document_category:%22annotation%22
It looks like the default behavior is to sort facet_counts.facet_fields
(field called 'typ
On 9/19/2013 3:14 AM, Anton M wrote:
> Shawn, I had swap file growing (up to 50-60%) and working while load tests
> ran. Did you configure 'swapiness' on your Linux box (set it to 0 earlier,
> maybe)? If not, my Windows OS could be cause of that difference.
The vm.swappiness sysctl setting is 1.
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Memory-Using-In-Faceted-Search-UnInvertedField-s-tp4090889p4091014.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 9/18/2013 11:08 AM, an...@swooptalent.com wrote:
> I'm using Solr 4.3.1 for faceted search and have 4 fields used for faceting.
> My question is about memory consumtion.
> I've set up heap size to use 6Gb of RAM, but I see in resource monitor it
> uses much more than tha
Hello,
I'm using Solr 4.3.1 for faceted search and have 4 fields used for faceting. My
question is about memory consumtion.
I've set up heap size to use 6Gb of RAM, but I see in resource monitor it uses
much more than that - up to 10Gb where 4 Gb is reported as shareable me
for this?
>>
>> Blacklight seems to be a good option, not sure without prior knowledge of
>> ruby on rails, will I be able to present in short period of time? any
>> suggestion on this?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-faceted-search-UI-tp4058598p4058617.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
t; View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-faceted-search-UI-tp4058598p4058617.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
r your suggestion.
> Tell me one thing, do you have any example on solrj? suppose I decide to
> use solrj in simple web application, to display faceted search on web page.
> Where will this fit into? what will be the flow?
>
> Please suggest.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
Hi Maj,
Thanks for your suggestion.
Tell me one thing, do you have any example on solrj? suppose I decide to
use solrj in simple web application, to display faceted search on web page.
Where will this fit into? what will be the flow?
Please suggest.
Thanks
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:01 AM
uggest or how would you have proceeded
> for this?
>
> Blacklight seems to be a good option, not sure without prior knowledge of
> ruby on rails, will I be able to present in short period of time? any
> suggestion on this?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> h
suggest or how would you have proceeded
for this?
Blacklight seems to be a good option, not sure without prior knowledge of
ruby on rails, will I be able to present in short period of time? any
suggestion on this?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-faceted
Hi richa,
You can use solrJ (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#Reading_Data_from_Solr)
to query your solr index.
On the wiki page indicated, you will see example of faceted search using
solrJ.
2009 article by Yonik available on
searchhub<http://searchhub.org/2009/09/02/faceted-search-with-s
klight.org a try - it's a Ruby
on Rails full featured front-end to Solr. There's also solrstrap that looks
like a fun place to do some lightweight PoC development.
Erik
On Apr 24, 2013, at 10:43 , richa wrote:
> Hi,
> I am working on a POC, where I have to display facet
Hi,
I am working on a POC, where I have to display faceted search result on web
page. can anybody please help me to suggest what all set up I need to
configure to display. I would prefer java technologies. Just to mention, I
have solr cloud running on remote server.
I would like to know:
1. Should
appreciate your answer
Erol Akarsu
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Faceted-search-on-SOLR-tp4045297p4045563.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
n Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Erol Akarsu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to design faceted search with SOLR.
>
> When I define
>
> CPU_Type
>
> I am getting results with http://localhost:8080/solr/browse
>
> CPU Type
>
> core (415)
> intel (
8:52 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Faceted search question (Tokenizing)
Hey There,
We have the following data structure:
- Person
-- Interest 1
--- Subinterest 1
--- Subinterest 1 Description
--- Subinterest 1 ID
-- Interest 2
--- Subinterest 2
--- Subinterest 2 Description
tion='Interest 2 Description',ID='Interest 2
ID'|
I have a feeling like this is a wrong approach to this problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Faceted-search-question-Tokenizing-tp4012948.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
if I
facet Data 1 + Data 11, I only want to see Data 21.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Faceted-search-question-Tokenizing-tp4012948p4012956.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
r will be used
> primarily for indexing and the queries will be load balanced across to the
> replicated slave servers. I would like to know if, with the current support
> for Near Real Time search in 4.0, there's support for Faceted Search. Keeping
> in mind that the searches
with the current support for
Near Real Time search in 4.0, there's support for Faceted Search. Keeping in
mind that the searches will be performed against the Slave servers and not the
Master (indexing) server.
If it's not supported, will we need to use SolrCloud to gain the benefits of
>>>> etc etc
>>>>
>>>> Can this be done on the fly?
>>>>
>>>> I ask this because I am currently developing webscrapers to crawl these
>>>> websites, dump that data into a db, then was thinking of tacking on a
>> solr
>
gt; I ask this because I am currently developing webscrapers to crawl these
>>> websites, dump that data into a db, then was thinking of tacking on a
> solr
>>> server to crawl my db.
>>>
>>> Problem with that approach is that cra
ites, dump that data into a db, then was thinking of tacking on a
solr
>> server to crawl my db.
>>
>> Problem with that approach is that crawling the worlds ecommerce sites
will
>> take forever, when it seems solr might do that for me? (I have read about
>> multiple in
ew this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Will-Solr-Lucene-crawl-multi-websites-aka-a-mini-google-with-faceted-search-tp3328314p3328314.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
the worlds ecommerce sites will
take forever, when it seems solr might do that for me? (I have read about
multiple indexes etc).
Many thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Will-Solr-Lucene-crawl-multi-websites-aka-a-mini-google-with-faceted-search-tp3328314p33
.
Regards,
Gora
On 17-Aug-2011 8:36 PM, "Walter Underwood" wrote:
> I have no plan to look at the patents, but there is some serious prior art
in faceted search. First, faceted classification for libraries was invented
by S. R. Ranganathan in 1933. Computer search for libraries dates
patent rights only last 17 years then it is public domain.
On 08/17/2011 11:05 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
I have no plan to look at the patents, but there is some serious prior art in
faceted search. First, faceted classification for libraries was invented by S.
R. Ranganathan in 1933
I have no plan to look at the patents, but there is some serious prior art in
faceted search. First, faceted classification for libraries was invented by S.
R. Ranganathan in 1933. Computer search for libraries dates from the 1960's,
probably. Combining the two is obvious, even back
t; http://news.priorsmart.com/adobe-systems-v-kelora-systems-l4in/
>
> Consequently, they have been known to act on these threats. I don't think
> it would be prudent to ignore them. At any rate, lawyers will be involved
> and they aren't cheap. Until the suits have been
yers will be involved
and they aren't cheap. Until the suits have been played out with the likes
of eBay, Microsoft, and Adobe, potentially anyone who uses faceted search
systems could potentially be at risk.
Take it for what it's worth. Don't shoot the messenger.
--
View this
Le 17 août 2011 à 13:01, Robert Muir a écrit :
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:58:29PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>> I know you mean well and are probably wondering what to do next [...]
>>
>> Still, a short heads-up like Johnson's would seem OK?
>> After all, this is of concern to us all.
>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Tomas Zerolo
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:58:29PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> I know you mean well and are probably wondering what to do next [...]
>
> Still, a short heads-up like Johnson's would seem OK?
>
> After all, this is of concern to us all.
>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:58:29PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I know you mean well and are probably wondering what to do next [...]
Still, a short heads-up like Johnson's would seem OK?
After all, this is of concern to us all.
Regards
-- tomás
While I agree with Grant we shouldn't engage on a legal discussion, it may be
worth that this thread shares a few dates of when faceted search was used "in
the old times"...
paul
Le 16 août 2011 à 22:02, LaMaze Johnson a écrit :
>
> Grant Ingersoll-2 wrote:
>>
te in public on something that can only be decided in the
> courts.
>
> -Grant
>
We will definitely be in touch with our legal counsel. This was more a
"heads up" in hopes that others aren't blindsided by this.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.47206
titled "Method and
> System for Executing a Guided Parametric Search.
>
> Apparently, they believe that this patent gives them the rights to faceted
> search technology. Consequently, anyone who uses this technology without
> paying licensing fees is potentially a target of lit
7;m interested to know how all of this will play out in
the courts. Faceted search seems to be a component of every e-commerce site
on the web.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Faceted-Search-Patent-Lawsuit-Please-Read-tp3259475p3259672.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:03 AM, LaMaze Johnson wrote:
[...]
> Just thought I would make others aware of this. I'd appreciate any insight
> others might have regarding the issue.
[...]
If you will permit me a moment of levity, from the perspective of
someone in India, I would say, move to a non
they believe that this patent gives them the rights to faceted
search technology. Consequently, anyone who uses this technology without
paying licensing fees is potentially a target of litigation. They have
outstanding suits with companies such as Microsoft and Ebay. Additionally,
Adobe filed a counter
here's a brief reference to that approach in the lucene FAQ:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#Can_I_store_the_Lucene_index_in_a_relational_database.3F
Jonathan
So the question is, what is this technique/trick? More broadly: Why can
Lucene/Solr achieve better faceted search perfor
hat is this technique/trick? More broadly: Why can
Lucene/Solr achieve better faceted search performance theoretically than
RDBMS could (if so)?
*Note: My first guess would be that Lucene would use some space partitioning
method for partitioning a vector space built from the document fields as
d
Carbon copied:
*Context*
This is a question mainly about Lucene (or possibly Solr) internals. The
main topic is *faceted search*, in which search can happen along multiple
independent dimensions (facets) of objects (for example size, speed, price
of a car).
When implemented with relational
lr-achieve-high-performance-in-multi-field-faceted-search
> ,
> I would be interested to know some details.
>
> Thank you,
> Robin
>
Hello List,
Please see my question at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5552919/how-does-lucene-solr-achieve-high-performance-in-multi-field-faceted-search,
I would be interested to know some details.
Thank you,
Robin
: Hoss, I think the use case being asked about is specifically doing a
: facet.sort though, for cases where you actually do want to sort facet values
: with facet.sort, not sort records -- while still presenting the facet values
: with original case, but sorting them case insensitively.
Ah yes ...
Hoss, I think the use case being asked about is specifically doing a
facet.sort though, for cases where you actually do want to sort facet
values with facet.sort, not sort records -- while still presenting the
facet values with original case, but sorting them case insensitively.
The solutions
: I am trying to do a facet search and sort the facet values too.
...
: Then I followed the sample example schema.xml, created a copyField of type
...
:
...
: But the sorted facet values dont have their case preserved anymore.
:
: How can I get around this?
e the filterCache much
of the time via facet.enum.cache.minDf.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Furkan Kuru wrote:
> I am sorry for raising up this thread after 6 months.
>
> But we have still problems with faceted search on full-text fields.
>
> We try
I am sorry for raising up this thread after 6 months.
But we have still problems with faceted search on full-text fields.
We try to get most frequent words in a text field that is created in 1 hour.
The faceted search takes too much time even the matching number of documents
(created_at within 1
above definition and it worked well.
But the sorted facet values dont have their case preserved anymore.
How can I get around this?
Thank You.
Regards,
Shan
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Case-Insensitive-sorting-while-preserving-case-during-faceted-se
for a free webcast
Mastering the Power of Faceted Search
with Chris Hostetter
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
9:00 AM PST / 12:00 PM EST / 17:00 GMT
Click here to sign up
http://www.eventsvc.com/lucidimagination/event/f5d87726f8ab4ed4911aad605f94f455?trk=AP
Few search features have contributed
retrieved based on the job board. What do you think?
You can store the XPath expressions in a text file as strings, and
load/compile them as needed.
From: "Nagelberg, Kallin"
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 10:39:32 AM
Subject: RE: faceted search
only a string which can be stored in a text file
> or
> db, and retrieved based on the job board. What do you think?
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "Nagelberg, Kallin"
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Sent: Wed, July 2
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 10:39:32 AM
Subject: RE: faceted search with job title
Yeah you should definitely just setup a custom parser for each site.. should be
easy to extract title using groovy's xml parsing along with tagsoup for sloppy
ht
r dom code. But
is regex pattern flexible enough for all job boards?
Thanks.
From: "Nagelberg, Kallin"
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 10:39:32 AM
Subject: RE: faceted search with job title
Yeah you should defin
ge here :P
-Kallin Nagelberg
-Original Message-
From: Savannah Beckett [mailto:savannah_becket...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 12:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: dave.sea...@magicalia.com
Subject: Re: faceted search with job title
mmm...there must be better way.
42:55 AM
Subject: RE: faceted search with job title
You'd probably need to do some post processing on the pages and set up rules
for
each website to grab that specific bit of data. You could load the html into an
xml parser, then use xpath to grab content from a particular tag with a cl
ginal Message-
From: Savannah Beckett [mailto:savannah_becket...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 21 July 2010 16:38
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: faceted search with job title
Hi,
I am currently using nutch to crawl some job pages from job boards. They are
in my solr index now. I want to do fa
Hi,
I am currently using nutch to crawl some job pages from job boards. They are
in my solr index now. I want to do faceted search with the job titles. How?
The job titles can be in any locations of the page, e.g. title, header,
content... If I use indexfilter in Nutch to search the
he solr jvm? Many servlet containers have
>> small amount by default.
>>
>> -Kal
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: olivier sallou [mailto:olivier.sal...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:04 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>&g
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Faceted search outofmemory
>
> Hi,
> I try to make a faceted search on a very large index (around 200GB with
> 200M
> doc).
> I have an out of memory error. With no facet it works fine.
>
> There are quite many questions around this b
How much memory have you given the solr jvm? Many servlet containers have small
amount by default.
-Kal
-Original Message-
From: olivier sallou [mailto:olivier.sal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Faceted search outofmemory
Hi
ttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.limit
>
> -Original message-
> From: olivier sallou
> Sent: Tue 29-06-2010 20:11
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
> Subject: Re: Faceted search outofmemory
>
> How do make paging over facets?
>
> 2010/6/29 A
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.limit
-Original message-
From: olivier sallou
Sent: Tue 29-06-2010 20:11
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: Re: Faceted search outofmemory
How do make paging over facets?
2010/6/29 Ankit Bhatnagar
>
> Did you
How do make paging over facets?
2010/6/29 Ankit Bhatnagar
>
> Did you trying paging them?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: olivier sallou [mailto:olivier.sal...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:04 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject:
Did you trying paging them?
-Original Message-
From: olivier sallou [mailto:olivier.sal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Faceted search outofmemory
Hi,
I try to make a faceted search on a very large index (around 200GB with
Hi,
I try to make a faceted search on a very large index (around 200GB with 200M
doc).
I have an out of memory error. With no facet it works fine.
There are quite many questions around this but I could not find the answer.
How can we know the required memory when facets are used so that I try to
case?
> If not, is there any other way to mitigate the cache re-building problem of
> facet search?
>
> --- On Sun, 6/6/10, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
>> From: Yonik Seeley
>> Subject: Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
core strategy still work in this case? If
not, is there any other way to mitigate the cache re-building problem of facet
search?
--- On Sun, 6/6/10, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> From: Yonik Seeley
> Subject: Re: Faceted Search Slows Down as index gets larger
> To: solr-user@lucene.apa
Ok, I will have a look at distributed search, multi-core solr solution.
Thank you Yonik,
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Furkan Kuru wrote:
> > We try to provide real-time search. So the index is changing almost in
> every
> > minute.
> >
>
Using the Zoie/Bobo combination gives you realtime faceting. (Lucene based)
http://sna-projects.com/zoie/
http://sna-projects.com/bobo/
wiki write-up:
http://snaprojects.jira.com/wiki/display/BOBO/Realtime+Faceting+with+Zoie
We can take this over to the zoie/bobo mailing list if you have questio
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Furkan Kuru wrote:
> We try to provide real-time search. So the index is changing almost in every
> minute.
>
> We commit for every 100 documents received.
>
> The facet search is executed every 5 mins.
OK, that's the problem - pretty much every facet search is reb
We try to provide real-time search. So the index is changing almost in every
minute.
We commit for every 100 documents received.
The facet search is executed every 5 mins.
Here is the stats result after facet search with normal facet.method=fc (it
took 95 seconds)
*name: * fieldValueCache *cl
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
