Oh and one more thing, I was Googling on this and found http://www.springyweb.com/2012/01/hierarchical-faceting-with-elastic.html, so apparently your solution is similar to this: hierarchical Faceting With Elastic Search? So does your solution facilitate for items to be in multiple categories? e.g. a product may be in:
Man Man > top Man > top > shirt Man > top > shirt> sleeveless shirt AND also fall under: Clothing Clothing > shirt Clothing > shirt> sleeveless shirt Thanks again! From: Alessandro Benedetti [via Lucene] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:26 To: PeterKerk Subject: Re: Use faceted search to drill down in hierarchical structure and omit node data outside current selection The fact is that you are trying to model a hierarchical facet on documents that actually index the content as a simple field. What I would suggest for example is to use a PathhierarcyTokenizer for your field with a proper separator. This will produce these tokens in the index : input : Man > top > shirt > sleeveless shirt Tokenized : Man Man > top Man > top > shirt Man > top > shirt> sleeveless shirt At this point your counting will be exactly what you would like, you need only to parse it Search API side and model the hierarchical facets in nested elements. Cheers 2015-07-28 2:02 GMT+01:00 PeterKerk <[hidden email]>: > I have the following structure for my products, where a product may fall > into > multiple categories. In my case, a "caketopper", which would be under > "cake/caketoppers" as well as "caketoppers" (don't focus on the logic > behind > the category structure in this example). > > Category structure: > > cake > caketoppers > funny > > caketoppers > funny > > What I want is that when the user has chosen a category on level 0 (the > main > category selection), in this case 'caketoppers', I don't want to return the > attributes/values that same product has because it's also in a different > category. > I tried the following queries, but it keeps returning all data: > > > &f.slug_nl_0.facet.prefix=(caketoppers)&fq=slug_nl_0:"(caketoppers)" > > &f.slug_nl_0.facet.prefix="caketoppers"&fq=slug_nl_0:"(caketoppers)" > > I keep getting this result (cleaned for better readability): > > <result name="response" numFound="6" start="0"> > <doc> > <arr name="slug_nl_0"> > <str>caketoppers</str> > <str>cake</str> > </arr> > </doc> > </result> > <lst name="facet_counts"> > <lst name="facet_fields"> > <lst name="slug_nl_0"> > <int name="cake">6</int> > <int name="caketoppers">6</int> > </lst> > </lst> > </lst> > > But my desired result would be: > > <result name="response" numFound="6" start="0"> > <doc> > <arr name="slug_nl_0"> > <str>caketoppers</str> > </arr> > </doc> > </result> > <lst name="facet_counts"> > <lst name="facet_fields"> > <lst name="slug_nl_0"> > <int name="caketoppers">6</int> > </lst> > </lst> > </lst> > > > > field definition of 'slug_nl_0' in schema.xml: > <field name="slug_nl_0" type="text" indexed="true" stored="true" > multiValued="true"/> > > > I also tried with a more simple query but I'm getting the exact same > results: > > &facet.prefix=caketoppers&fq=slug_nl_0:caketoppers > > I then was reading into grouping: > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing > > So I tried adding that in my queries, but I get errors: > > > `&fq=slug_nl_0:taarttoppers&group=true&group.facet=true&group.field=slug_nl_0` > > > error: can not use FieldCache on multivalued field: slug_nl_0 > > `&fq=slug_nl_0:taarttoppers&group=true&group.field=slug_nl_0` > > error: can not use FieldCache on multivalued field: slug_nl_0 > > `&fq=slug_nl_0:taarttoppers&group.facet=true&group.field=slug_nl_0` > > error: Specify the group.field as parameter or local parameter > > And then I noticed this at the bottom of the page: > > > Known Limitations Support for grouping on a multi-valued field has not > > yet been implemented. > > On that same Solr FieldCollapsing example page they refer to Best Buy as an > example. Now I wonder how that was implemented without support for > multivalued fields. > > What can I do? > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Use-faceted-search-to-drill-down-in-hierarchical-structure-and-omit-node-data-outside-current-selectn-tp4219384.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- -------------------------- Benedetti Alessandro Visiting card - http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti Blog - http://alexbenedetti.blogspot.co.uk "Tyger, tyger burning bright In the forests of the night, What immortal hand or eye Could frame thy fearful symmetry?" William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Use-faceted-search-to-drill-down-in-hierarchical-structure-and-omit-node-data-outside-current-selectn-tp4219384p4219486.html To unsubscribe from Use faceted search to drill down in hierarchical structure and omit node data outside current selection, click here. NAML wlEmoticon-smile[1].png (1K) <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/attachment/4219517/0/wlEmoticon-smile%5B1%5D.png> -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Use-faceted-search-to-drill-down-in-hierarchical-structure-and-omit-node-data-outside-current-selectn-tp4219384p4219517.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
