Boost a dynamic field

Hello, I'm trying to boost a document score based on the existence of a dynamic field. I can't seem to get the syntax right and get either Solr server errors or it just doesn't do anything to the Solr response. In solrconfig.xml the dynamic fields are defined as...

Re: Dynamic field schema

On 7/10/2019 6:52 AM, ericstein wrote: the documents are in both cores. the official title field data exists in both. However, it only gives me the official_title_s field in the second core when I query. When I look at the schema in the admin it only shows the official_title_s field The schema

Re: Dynamic field schema

Hi Shawn, the documents are in both cores. the official title field data exists in both. However, it only gives me the official_title_s field in the second core when I query. When I look at the schema in the admin it only shows the official_title_s field -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.na

Re: Dynamic field schema

On 7/9/2019 5:42 PM, ericstein wrote: I am expecting both cores to have the following fields: official_title_s official_title_t However, the second core only recognizes: official_title_s It seems that the schema doesn't recognize my field the same in both cores. What do you mean by "recognize

Dynamic field schema

Hi all, I am new to the SOLR world, so bear with me. I have currently have 2 cores that share the same schema, or so I think? I have noticed that certain fields don't exist in both cores even though they are set to look at the same config sets (S:\solr-6.1.0\server\solr\configsets\sitecore_configs

Re: Add dynamic field to existing index slow

OK, then let’s see the indexing code. Make sure you don’t 1> commit after every batch 2> never, never, never optimize. BTW, you do not want to turn off commits entirely, there are some internal data structures that grow between commits. So I might do something like specify commitWithin on my add

Re: Add dynamic field to existing index slow

I have tested the query desperately, actually executing query is pretty fast, it only took a few minutes to go through all results including converting solr document to java object. So I believe the slowness is in persistence end.  BTW,  I am using linux system. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

Re: Add dynamic field to existing index slow

On 6/30/2019 2:08 PM, derrick cui wrote: Good point Erick, I will try it today, but I have already use cursorMark in my query for deep pagination. Also I noticed that my cpu usage is pretty high, 8 cores, usage is over 700%. I am not sure it will help if I use ssd disk That depends on whether

Re: Add dynamic field to existing index slow

elds >> 4) Possibly triggering a marge if a lot of documents have been updated >> >> Perhaps the above is a contributing factor. But I also feel that maybe >> there is some detail in your question I did not fully understand. >> >> Regards, >>  A

Re: Add dynamic field to existing index slow

ly triggering a marge if a lot of documents have been updated >> >> Perhaps the above is a contributing factor. But I also feel that maybe >> there is some detail in your question I did not fully understand. >> >> Regards, >> Alex. >> >> On Sun, 30 J

Re: Add dynamic field to existing index slow

bly triggering a marge if a lot of documents have been updated > > Perhaps the above is a contributing factor. But I also feel that maybe > there is some detail in your question I did not fully understand. > > Regards, > Alex. > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 10:33, derrick cui

Re: Add dynamic field to existing index slow

fully understand. Regards,   Alex. On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 10:33, derrick cui wrote: > > I have 400k data, indexing is pretty fast, only take 10 minutes, but add > dynamic field to all documents according to query results is very slow, take > about 1.5 hours. > Anyone knows wh

Re: Add dynamic field to existing index slow

k data, indexing is pretty fast, only take 10 minutes, but add > dynamic field to all documents according to query results is very slow, take > about 1.5 hours. > Anyone knows what could be the reason? > Thanks > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

Add dynamic field to existing index slow

I have 400k data, indexing is pretty fast, only take 10 minutes, but add dynamic field to all documents according to query results is very slow, take about 1.5 hours. Anyone knows what could be the reason? Thanks Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

Re: dynamic field issue

> Here we are indexing dynamic fields and we are using one of this field in* > bf *. > Would only indexing dynamic field will increase heap and load of master - > slave solr servers ? > > > Regards, > Midas > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:03 PM Erick Erickson >

Re: dynamic field issue

Here we are indexing dynamic fields and we are using one of this field in* bf *. Would only indexing dynamic field will increase heap and load of master - slave solr servers ? Regards, Midas On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:03 PM Erick Erickson wrote: > 300 is still not excessive. As far as mem

Re: dynamic field issue

;> >>> Do note that once you get to more than a few hundred fields, >>> Solr still functions, but I’ve seen performance degrade and >>> memory increase. >>> >>> Best, >>> Erick >>> >>>> On Feb 21, 2019, at 7:54 AM, Mida

Re: dynamic field issue

that once you get to more than a few hundred fields, >> Solr still functions, but I’ve seen performance degrade and >> memory increase. >> >> Best, >> Erick >> >> > On Feb 21, 2019, at 7:54 AM, Midas A wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for quick re

Re: dynamic field issue

e than a few hundred fields, > Solr still functions, but I’ve seen performance degrade and > memory increase. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Feb 21, 2019, at 7:54 AM, Midas A wrote: > > > > Thanks for quick reply . > > > > we are creating search *query(k

Re: dynamic field issue

for quick reply . > > we are creating search *query(keyword)* for dynamic field creation to > use click ,cart and order data in search. > > But we are experiencing more heap and increase in query time . > What could be the problem? can be anything related to it ? > >

Re: dynamic field issue

Thanks for quick reply . we are creating search *query(keyword)* for dynamic field creation to use click ,cart and order data in search. But we are experiencing more heap and increase in query time . What could be the problem? can be anything related to it ? On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:43

dynamic field issue

Hi All, How many dynamic field we can create in solr ?. is there any limitation ? Is indexing dynamic field can increase heap memory on server . Regards, Midas

Re: dynamic field issue

On 2/21/2019 8:01 AM, Midas A wrote: How many dynamic field we can create in solr ?. is there any limitation ? Is indexing dynamic field can increase heap memory on server . At the Lucene level, there is absolutely no difference between a standard field and a dynamic field. The difference in

7.4.0 Newbie Question about bin/post and parsing/extracting html document parts into solr dynamic field.

Hi, New to solr, so forgive any missing info on my part. 1. I am trying figure out how to get an html document html element parsed into a solr dynamic field. Is it possible ? So let's say I have some specific html tag or xml tags within the html document, that I created a Dy

Re: Error when indexing against a specific dynamic field type

hen I index against the same document with our solr 4.7, it is > successfully indexed. So, I assume something is different between 4.7 and > 7.3. I was assuming I could adjust the dynamic field somehow so that it > indexes against these documents without errors when using 7.3. > >

Re: Error when indexing against a specific dynamic field type

was assuming I could adjust the dynamic field somehow so that it indexes against these documents without errors when using 7.3. I can't remove the offending documents. Its my customer's data Is there some adjustment I can make to the dynamic field? Thanks again. -- Sent from: htt

Re: Error when indexing against a specific dynamic field type

On 5/1/2018 8:40 AM, THADC wrote: > I get the following exception: > > *Exception writing document id FULL_36265 to the index; possible analysis > error: Document contains at least one immense term in > field="gridFacts_tsing" (whose UTF8 encoding is longer than the max length > 32766), all of whic

Re: Error when indexing against a specific dynamic field type

- perhaps the analyzer used by this dynamic field should change? Alternatively, you could: a) truncate long values so that a prefix makes it through the indexing process, e.g. by adding TruncateTokenFilterFactory[1] to alphaOnlySort’s analyzer, or by adding TruncateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory[2

Re: Error when indexing against a specific dynamic field type

are migrating from solr 4.7 to 7.3. When I encounter a data item that > matches a custom dynamic field from our 4.7 schema: > > * stored="true" multiValued="false"/>* > > , I get the following exception: > > *Exception writing document id FULL_36265 to the i

Error when indexing against a specific dynamic field type

Hello, We are migrating from solr 4.7 to 7.3. When I encounter a data item that matches a custom dynamic field from our 4.7 schema: ** , I get the following exception: *Exception writing document id FULL_36265 to the index; possible analysis error: Document contains at least one immense term

Re: How to get field names of dynamic field

>> test.mi...@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> Actually , i am looking for APi >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Andrea Gazzarini >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > I can see those names in

Re: How to get field names of dynamic field

y , i am looking for APi >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Andrea Gazzarini >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I can see those names in the "Schema browser" of the admin UI, so I >> >> guess >> >> >

Re: How to get field names of dynamic field

; wrote: > >> > >> > I can see those names in the "Schema browser" of the admin UI, so I > >> guess > >> > using the (lucene?) API it shouldn't be hard to get this info. > >> > > >> > I don' know i

Re: How to get field names of dynamic field

get this info. >> > >> > I don' know if the schema api (or some other service) offer this service >> > >> > Andrea >> > >> > On 14 Apr 2017 10:03, "Midas A" wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >>

Re: How to get field names of dynamic field

vice) offer this service > > > > Andrea > > > > On 14 Apr 2017 10:03, "Midas A" wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > Can i get all the field created for dynamic field in solr . > > > > > > Like > >

Re: How to get field names of dynamic field

I, so I guess > using the (lucene?) API it shouldn't be hard to get this info. > > I don' know if the schema api (or some other service) offer this service > > Andrea > > On 14 Apr 2017 10:03, "Midas A" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > >

Re: How to get field names of dynamic field

pi (or some other service) offer this service > > Andrea > > On 14 Apr 2017 10:03, "Midas A" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Can i get all the field created for dynamic field in solr . > > > > Like > > my dynamic field is by_* > >

Re: How to get field names of dynamic field

Hi, > > > Can i get all the field created for dynamic field in solr . > > Like > my dynamic field is by_* > > and i have index > by_color > by_size .. > etc > > I want to retrieve all these field name . > Is there any way to do this based on some query >

How to get field names of dynamic field

Hi, Can i get all the field created for dynamic field in solr . Like my dynamic field is by_* and i have index by_color by_size .. etc I want to retrieve all these field name . Is there any way to do this based on some query

Re: dynamic field sorting

; > > How can i improve the performance of dynamic field sorting . > > > > index size is : 20 GB > > > > Regards, > > Midas > > > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev

Re: dynamic field sorting

waiting for reply . Actually Heap utilization increases when we sort with dynamic fields On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Midas A wrote: > Hi , > > How can i improve the performance of dynamic field sorting . > > index size is : 20 GB > > Regards, > Midas >

dynamic field sorting

Hi , How can i improve the performance of dynamic field sorting . index size is : 20 GB Regards, Midas

Re: Fwd: Solr dynamic field blowing up the index size

ovitch < >> >> arafa...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Did you look in the data directories to check what index file >> extensions >> >> > contribute most to the difference? That could give a hint. >> >> >

Re: Fwd: Solr dynamic field blowing up the index size

..@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Did you look in the data directories to check what index file > extensions > >> > contribute most to the difference? That could give a hint. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> >

Re: Fwd: Solr dynamic field blowing up the index size

t; > Alex >> > >> > On 21 Feb 2017 9:47 AM, "Pratik Patel" wrote: >> > >> > > Here is the same question in stackOverflow for better format. >> > > >> > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/42370231/solr- >> >

Re: Fwd: Solr dynamic field blowing up the index size

at index file extensions > > contribute most to the difference? That could give a hint. > > > > Regards, > > Alex > > > > On 21 Feb 2017 9:47 AM, "Pratik Patel" wrote: > > > > > Here is the same question in stackOverflow for better for

Re: Fwd: Solr dynamic field blowing up the index size

ck what index file extensions > contribute most to the difference? That could give a hint. > > Regards, > Alex > > On 21 Feb 2017 9:47 AM, "Pratik Patel" wrote: > > > Here is the same question in stackOverflow for better format. > > > > http:

Re: Fwd: Solr dynamic field blowing up the index size

//stackoverflow.com/questions/42370231/solr- > dynamic-field-blowing-up-the-index-size > > Recently, I upgraded from solr 5.0 to solr 6.4.1. I can run my app fine but > the problem is that index size with solr 6 is way too large. In solr 5, > index size was about 15GB and in solr 6, for

Fwd: Solr dynamic field blowing up the index size

Here is the same question in stackOverflow for better format. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/42370231/solr- dynamic-field-blowing-up-the-index-size Recently, I upgraded from solr 5.0 to solr 6.4.1. I can run my app fine but the problem is that index size with solr 6 is way too large. In solr

Re: facet on dynamic field

You'll have to enumerate them (see the Luke request handler) and specify them explicitly. > On Nov 4, 2016, at 03:40, Midas A wrote: > > i want to create facet on all dynamic field (by_*) . what should be the > query ?

facet on dynamic field

i want to create facet on all dynamic field (by_*) . what should be the query ?

Re: Specifying dynamic field type without polluting actual field names with type indicators

the field type when it is being > added > > > (similar to the name postfixes, but without affecting the field names). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > 2016-05-17 17:08 GMT+02:00 Steve Rowe : > > > > &g

Re: Specifying dynamic field type without polluting actual field names with type indicators

t; >> Hi Peter, > >> > >> Are you familiar with the Schema API?: < > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Schema+API> > >> > >> You can use it to create fields, field types, etc. prior to ingesting > your > >> dat

Re: Creating dynamic field, but strip the type indicator postfix from the name

Why is this important? I'm failing to see how this helps in "making the queries simpler to form". What's the difference between making a query q=field:value and q=field_s:value? If it's a display issue, it seems like the display app could simply strip anything after the terminal underscore from th

Re: Specifying dynamic field type without polluting actual field names with type indicators

prior to ingesting your >> data. >> >> -- >> Steve >> www.lucidworks.com >> >>> On May 17, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Horváth Péter Gergely < >> peter.gergely.horv...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >&

Creating dynamic field, but strip the type indicator postfix from the name

Hi Everyone, I am wondering if it is possible to store dynamic fields without the type indicator postfix. In our Solr environment, I would like to 1.) use dynamic fields ("data drivern collections" with no fixed fields specified in advance) 2.) be able to specify the field type, but without intera

Re: Specifying dynamic field type without polluting actual field names with type indicators

ww.lucidworks.com > > > On May 17, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Horváth Péter Gergely < > peter.gergely.horv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > By default Solr allows you to define the type of a dynamic field by > > appending a post-fix to the nam

Re: Specifying dynamic field type without polluting actual field names with type indicators

On 5/17/2016 9:05 AM, Horváth Péter Gergely wrote: > By default Solr allows you to define the type of a dynamic field by > appending a post-fix to the name itself. E.g. creating a color_s field > instructs Solr to create a string field. My understanding is that if we do > this, all

Re: Specifying dynamic field type without polluting actual field names with type indicators

ote: > > Hi All, > > By default Solr allows you to define the type of a dynamic field by > appending a post-fix to the name itself. E.g. creating a color_s field > instructs Solr to create a string field. My understanding is that if we do > this, all queries must refer the

Specifying dynamic field type without polluting actual field names with type indicators

Hi All, By default Solr allows you to define the type of a dynamic field by appending a post-fix to the name itself. E.g. creating a color_s field instructs Solr to create a string field. My understanding is that if we do this, all queries must refer the post-fixed field name as well. So instead

Specifying dynamic field type without polluting actual field names with type indicators

Hi All, By default Solr allows you to define the type of a dynamic field by appending a post-fix to the name itself. E.g. creating a color_s field instructs Solr to create a string field. My understanding is that if we do this, all queries must refer the post-fixed field name as well. So instead

Re: Why can a dynamic field ONLY start or end with '*' but not both?

gt; to create dynamic fields using multiple 'glob' characters. > > e.g. > > Since this commit > <https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/5cbf7f54c38924c19f9cdc347c729abfd7b17076#diff-ca2b07d8a1eaf45cdb5e73eba102ba38R423>, > a constraint has been added that the

Why can a dynamic field ONLY start or end with '*' but not both?

c347c729abfd7b17076#diff-ca2b07d8a1eaf45cdb5e73eba102ba38R423>, a constraint has been added that the name of a dynamic field must either start or end with '*', but not both. Was this decision discussed anywhere? It's causing a schema of mine to break after upgrading and I'm ju

Re: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

> > > > > subFieldSuffix="_coordinate"/> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > required="false" multiValued="false" /> > > > > > > > > > > how you know it is because of stored="

Re: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

t; > > > how you know it is because of stored="true"? > > > > > > > > As Erick replied in the last mail thread, > > > > I'm not getting any multiple values in the _coordinate fields. > > However, I > > > > _do_ get the

Re: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

"true"? > > > > > > As Erick replied in the last mail thread, > > > I'm not getting any multiple values in the _coordinate fields. > However, I > > > _do_ get the error if my dynamic *_coordinate field is set to > > > stored=&q

Re: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

lds. However, I > > _do_ get the error if my dynamic *_coordinate field is set to > > stored="true". > > > > And stored="true" is mandatory for using the atomic updates. > > > > With Regards > > Aman Tandon > > > > On Mon, Sep 2

Re: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

is mandatory for using the atomic updates. > > With Regards > Aman Tandon > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Upayavira wrote: > >> Can you show the error you are getting, and how you know it is because >> of stored="true"? >> >> Upayavira

Re: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

: > Can you show the error you are getting, and how you know it is because > of stored="true"? > > Upayavira > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015, at 09:30 AM, Aman Tandon wrote: > > Hi Erick, > > > > I am getting the same error because my dynamic field *_coordinate

Re: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

Can you show the error you are getting, and how you know it is because of stored="true"? Upayavira On Mon, Sep 21, 2015, at 09:30 AM, Aman Tandon wrote: > Hi Erick, > > I am getting the same error because my dynamic field *_coordinate is > stored="true". &

Re: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

Hi Erick, I am getting the same error because my dynamic field *_coordinate is stored="true". How can I get rid of this error? And I have to use the atomic update. Please help!! With Regards Aman Tandon On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Franco Giacosa wrote: > Hey Erick, i think

Re: Dynamic field rule plugin?

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015, at 11:09 PM, Hari Iyer wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to Solr and am trying to create dynamic field rules in my > Schema. > > I would like to use file name suffix to indicate other properties besides > the data type and multivalued as provided in the def

Dynamic field rule plugin?

Hi, I am new to Solr and am trying to create dynamic field rules in my Schema. I would like to use file name suffix to indicate other properties besides the data type and multivalued as provided in the default schema. It appears that specifying this via a pattern leads to duplication as there

dynamic field value in ValueSource

ultiValued="false" /> The problem is, when i try to read the dynamic field with the following code it does not return the correct value (it prints '`', should be 6): public FunctionValues getValues(Map map, final AtomicReaderContext arc) th

Re: Solr Dynamic Field Performance

fields So while your search performance might suffer if you defined 5,000 dynamic fields, it would have suffered just the same if you'd used 5,000 static fields. There could conceivably be some indexing performance if you had, say, 5,000 dynamic field _patterns_, but I'm not ver

Re: Solr Dynamic Field Performance

fields So while your search performance might suffer if you defined 5,000 dynamic fields, it would have suffered just the same if you'd used 5,000 static fields. There could conceivably be some indexing performance if you had, say, 5,000 dynamic field _patterns_, but I'm not ver

Re: Solr Dynamic Field Performance

: : : Just to confirm, the fieldCache doesn't store anything extra when we use : dynamic fields and do sorting query on that...right? the way the FieldCache works, is that it has to "cache" a value for every document -- even if

Re: Solr Dynamic Field Performance

ery on that...right? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Dynamic-Field-Performance-tp4158737p4158919.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr Dynamic Field Performance

to >> replace these explicit fields with 6 dynamic fields. Each of these 200 >> fields will match one of the 6 dynamic field. >> >> I am evaluating performance implications of switching to dynamicFields. I >> have tested with a smaller dataset(5M docs) but didn&#x

Re: Solr Dynamic Field Performance

> Each doc have around 20 fields. I now have a use case where I need to > replace these explicit fields with 6 dynamic fields. Each of these 200 > fields will match one of the 6 dynamic field. > > I am evaluating performance implications of switching to dynamicFields. I > have tes

Solr Dynamic Field Performance

I have a collection with 200 fields and >300M docs running in cloud mode. Each doc have around 20 fields. I now have a use case where I need to replace these explicit fields with 6 dynamic fields. Each of these 200 fields will match one of the 6 dynamic field. I am evaluating performa

Re: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

? If so, this sounds like it could be > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3502. > > > > > > -Michael > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Franco Giacosa [mailto:fgiac...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Monday, August 04

Re: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

l > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Franco Giacosa [mailto:fgiac...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 9:05 PM > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error > > > > Hello every

Re: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

owse/SOLR-3502. > > -Michael > > -Original Message- > From: Franco Giacosa [mailto:fgiac...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 9:05 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error > > Hello everyone, t

RE: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error Hello everyone, this is my first time posting a question, so forgive me if i'm missing something. This is my problem: I have a schema.xml that has the following latLong information The dynamic

solr update dynamic field generates multiValued error

Hello everyone, this is my first time posting a question, so forgive me if i'm missing something. This is my problem: I have a schema.xml that has the following latLong information The dynamicField generates 2 dynamic fields that have the lat and the long (latLong_0_coordinate and latLong_1_coor

Re: Dynamic field doesnt work

Jack thank you very much! So obvious - damn, Ive mixed my codebase with solr shema xml :) 2014-07-03 14:23 GMT+02:00 Jack Krupansky : > s/dynamic_field/dynamicField/

Re: Dynamic field doesnt work

wrote: > s/dynamic_field/dynamicField/ > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Alexandre Rafalovitch > Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 5:45 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Dynamic field doesnt work > > > I would say something is misspe

Re: Dynamic field doesnt work

s/dynamic_field/dynamicField/ -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Alexandre Rafalovitch Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 5:45 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Dynamic field doesnt work I would say something is misspelt somewhere. Put a dynamic field called '*

Re: Dynamic field doesnt work

I would say something is misspelt somewhere. Put a dynamic field called '*' and see what you end up getting in the schema. Obviously, on a separate test instance. Regards, Alex. Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating

Dynamic field doesnt work

Hi dear SOLR community, I'm having a problem with a dynamic field in my schema - basically when I'm adding any document with key matching dynamic field definition I'm getting back an error which says something like unknown field 'test_exattrs' The schema contains such

Re: dynamic field assignments

Chris, Thanks so much for the suggestion. I will look into this approach. It looks very promising! John On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : My understanding is that DynamicField can do something like > : FOO_BAR_TEXT_* but what I really need is *_TEXT_* as I might ha

Re: dynamic field assignments

: My understanding is that DynamicField can do something like : FOO_BAR_TEXT_* but what I really need is *_TEXT_* as I might have : FOO_BAR_TEXT_1 but I also might have WIDGET_BAR_TEXT_2. Both of those : field names need to map to a field type of 'fullText'. I'm pretty sure you can get what you

Re: dynamic field assignments

these provide the tools to dynamically add fields to a schema. See: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Schemaless+Mode Dynamic field are a very powerful feature of Solr, but please don't treat them as a panacea for weak data modeling. Use them only in moderation. -- Jack

Re: dynamic field assignments

Jack, Thanks for your help. > Reading your last paragraph, how is that any different than exactly what > DynamicField actually does? My understanding is that DynamicField can do something like FOO_BAR_TEXT_* but what I really need is *_TEXT_* as I might have FOO_BAR_TEXT_1 but I also might have

Re: dynamic field assignments

ist, but it is not a substitute for professional review. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: John Thorhauer Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 7:10 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: dynamic field assignments I have a scenario where I would like dynamically assign incoming do

dynamic field assignments

I have a scenario where I would like dynamically assign incoming document fields to two different solr schema fieldTypes. One fieldType will be an exact match fieldType while the other will be a full text fieldType. I know that I can use the dynamicField to assign fields using the asterisk in a n

Re: dynamic field question

;Dynamic fields work best when used in moderation. Your use case seems > >like > >an excessive use of dynamic fields. > > > >-- Jack Krupansky > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Twomey, David > >Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 6:59 PM > >To: solr-use

Re: dynamic field question

uot; >field >to tie them together. > >Dynamic fields work best when used in moderation. Your use case seems >like >an excessive use of dynamic fields. > >-- Jack Krupansky > >-Original Message- >From: Twomey, David >Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 6:5

Re: dynamic field question

oderation. Your use case seems like > an excessive use of dynamic fields. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Twomey, David > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 6:59 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: dynamic field question > > > >

  1   2   >