300 is still not excessive. As far as memory goes, sure. If you’re faceting, 
grouping, or sorting docValues would _certainly_ help with memory consumption.

> On Feb 21, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Midas A <test.mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi ,
> Plelase help me here we have crossed 100+ fields per dyanmic fields and we
> have three dynamic fields.
> using docValues in dynamic fields will help in improving heap and query
> time ?
> 
> Regards,
> Abhishek Tiwari
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:38 PM Midas A <test.mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yes . We have crossed  100 fields .
>> 
>> Would docValues help here ?
>> 
>> What kind of information you want from my side ?
>> 
>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, 9:31 pm Erick Erickson, <erickerick...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> There’s no way to answer this given you’ve provided almost no
>>> information.
>>> 
>>> Do note that once you get to more than a few hundred fields,
>>> Solr still functions, but I’ve seen performance degrade and
>>> memory increase.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Erick
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 21, 2019, at 7:54 AM, Midas A <test.mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for quick reply .
>>>> 
>>>> we are creating  search *query(keyword)*  for dynamic field creation  to
>>>> use click ,cart  and order data  in search.
>>>> 
>>>> But we are experiencing  more heap and increase in query time .
>>>> What could be the problem? can be anything related to it ?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:43 PM Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2/21/2019 8:01 AM, Midas A wrote:
>>>>>> How many dynamic field we can create in solr ?. is there any
>>> limitation ?
>>>>>> Is indexing dynamic field can increase heap memory on server .
>>>>> 
>>>>> At the Lucene level, there is absolutely no difference between a
>>>>> standard field and a dynamic field.  The difference in Solr is how the
>>>>> field is defined, nothing more.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Lucene has no hard limitations on the number of fields you can create,
>>>>> but the more you have the larger your index will probably be.  Larger
>>>>> indexes perform slower than smaller ones and require more resources
>>> like
>>>>> memory.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Shawn
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to