RE: Distributed IDF performance

port lots of Lucene stuff to 5. I would sure like to see some numbers from any of you :) Markus -Original message- > From:Anshum Gupta > Sent: Friday 13th March 2015 23:33 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Distributed IDF performance > > np! > &g

Re: Distributed IDF performance

np! I forgot to mention that I didn't notice any considerable performance hit in my tests. The QTimes were barely off by 5%. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > Oops... I said "StatsInfo" and that should have been "StatsCache" > (""). > > -- Jack Krupansky > > On Fri, Mar 1

Re: Distributed IDF performance

Oops... I said "StatsInfo" and that should have been "StatsCache" (""). -- Jack Krupansky On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > There's no rough formula or performance data that I know of at this point. > About he guidance, if you want to use Global stats, my obvious choice wou

Re: Distributed IDF performance

There's no rough formula or performance data that I know of at this point. About he guidance, if you want to use Global stats, my obvious choice would be to use the LRUStatsCache. Before committing, I did run some tests on my macbook but as I said back then, they shouldn't be totally taken at face

Distributed IDF performance

Does anybody have any actual performance data or even a rough formula for calculating the overhead for using the new Solr 5.0 Distributed IDF ( SOLR-1632 )? And any guidance as far as which StatsInfo plugin is best to use? Are many people now using