use Rivulet Enterprise Search , http://sourceforge.net/projects/rivu/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/rivu/ , it's very easy to use
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/CommonsHttpSolrServer-vs-EmbeddedSolrServer-tp784201p786785.html
Sent from the Solr -
Too
many close [count:-3] on org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore...". Maybe my
implementation was off???
Is there any detailed documentation on SolrJ usage.. more than the wiki? Any
books? Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/CommonsHttpSolrServer-v
mbeddedSolrServer is 50% faster than
>> CommonsHttpSolrServer,then why do we need to use CommonsHttpSolrServer.
>>
>> Can anyone please guide me the right path/way.So that i pick the right
>> implementation.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> --Sach
r-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 1:30:05 PM
> Subject: CommonsHttpSolrServer vs EmbeddedSolrServer
>
>
> What is the difference between EmbeddedSolrServer and CommonsHttpSolrServer.
> Which is the preferred server to use?
>
> In some blog i read that Embedded
,then why do we need to use
CommonsHttpSolrServer.
Can anyone please guide me the right path/way.So that i pick the
right
implementation.
Thanks in advance.
--Sachin
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/CommonsHttpSolrServer-vs-EmbeddedSolrServer-tp23545281p23545281.html
ks in advance.
--Sachin
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/CommonsHttpSolrServer-vs-EmbeddedSolrServer-tp23545281p23545281.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenS
/way.So that i pick the right
implementation.
Thanks in advance.
--Sachin
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/CommonsHttpSolrServer-vs-EmbeddedSolrServer-tp23545281p23545281.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
