Thank You Eric,Ryan and Otis for making me understand the difference.Now i got a clear picture of which server implementation to use for what.
--Sachin Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > > Sachin, > > > EmbeddedSolrServer implies an embedded, local, in-process access to Solr. > CommonsHttpSolrServer lets you access a remote Solr instance via HTTP. > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: sachin78 <tendulkarsachi...@gmail.com> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 1:30:05 PM >> Subject: CommonsHttpSolrServer vs EmbeddedSolrServer >> >> >> What is the difference between EmbeddedSolrServer and >> CommonsHttpSolrServer. >> Which is the preferred server to use? >> >> In some blog i read that EmbeddedSolrServer is 50% faster than >> CommonsHttpSolrServer,then why do we need to use CommonsHttpSolrServer. >> >> Can anyone please guide me the right path/way.So that i pick the right >> implementation. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> --Sachin >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/CommonsHttpSolrServer-vs-EmbeddedSolrServer-tp23545281p23545281.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CommonsHttpSolrServer-vs-EmbeddedSolrServer-tp23545281p23623969.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
