erformance of Elasticsearch and SenseiDB in your benchmark?
>
>
>
> From: Volodymyr Zhabiuk
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:50 PM
> Subject: Benchmark Solr vs Elastic Search vs Sensei
>
> Hi Solr u
, April 27, 2012 3:58 PM
> Subject: Re: Benchmark Solr vs Elastic Search vs Sensei
>
> This is a pretty awesome combination, actually. I'm getting started using it
> myself, and I'd be very interested in what kind of benchmark results you get
> vs. Solr and your other ca
What is the performance of Elasticsearch and SenseiDB in your benchmark?
From: Volodymyr Zhabiuk
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:50 PM
Subject: Benchmark Solr vs Elastic Search vs Sensei
Hi Solr users
I've implemente
So the Cassandra integration brings distributed index and replication to Solr?
Is that different from what Solr Cloud does?
From: Jeff Schmidt
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: Benchmark Solr vs Elastic Search
I think Datatax Enterprise is faster than Solr Cloud with transaction
logging turned on. Cassandra has it's own fast(er) transaction
logging mechanism. Of course it's best to use two HDs when testing,
eg, one for the data, the other for the transaction log.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jeff
This is a pretty awesome combination, actually. I'm getting started using it
myself, and I'd be very interested in what kind of benchmark results you get
vs. Solr and your other candidates. DataStax Enterprise 2.0 was released in
March and is based on Solr 4.0 and Cassandra 1.0.7 or 1.0.8, I'm
On Apr 27, 2012, at 12:39 PM, Radim Kolar wrote:
> Dne 27.4.2012 19:59, Jeremy Taylor napsal(a):
>> DataStax offers a Solr integration that isn't master/slave and is
>> NearRealTimes.
> its rebranded solandra?
No, it is a rewrite.
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cassandra-with-solr-integration-
Dne 27.4.2012 19:59, Jeremy Taylor napsal(a):
DataStax offers a Solr integration that isn't master/slave and is
NearRealTimes.
its rebranded solandra?
Essentially, the software offers the great features of
> Solr without the major shortcomings.
>
> Jeremy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 5:26 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subje
5:26 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Benchmark Solr vs Elastic Search vs Sensei
Some observations:
1> I suspect some of your queries aren't doing what you expect, but
I'm not sure if that matters. e.g. !tags:chick magnet will be parsed
as -tags:chick defa
Some observations:
1> I suspect some of your queries aren't doing what you expect, but
I'm not sure if that matters. e.g. !tags:chick magnet will be parsed
as -tags:chick defaultField:magnet.
2> Typical Solr setups in production are usually master/slave
setups. Your indexing process
Hi Solr users
I've implemented the project to compare the performance between
Solr, Elastic Search and SenseiDB
https://github.com/vzhabiuk/search-perf
the Solr version 3.5.0 was used. I've used the default configuration,
just enabled json updates and used the following schema
https://github.com/
12 matches
Mail list logo
