I think Datatax Enterprise is faster than Solr Cloud with transaction logging turned on. Cassandra has it's own fast(er) transaction logging mechanism. Of course it's best to use two HDs when testing, eg, one for the data, the other for the transaction log.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jeff Schmidt <j...@535consulting.com> wrote: > This is a pretty awesome combination, actually. I'm getting started using it > myself, and I'd be very interested in what kind of benchmark results you get > vs. Solr and your other candidates. DataStax Enterprise 2.0 was released in > March and is based on Solr 4.0 and Cassandra 1.0.7 or 1.0.8, I'm looking for > the Cassandra 1.1 based release. > > Note: I am not affiliated with DataStax in anyway, other than being a > satisfied customer for the past few months. I am just trying to selfishly > fuel your interest so you'll consider benchmarking it. > > My project is already using Cassandra, and we had to manage Solr separately. > Having the Solr indexes, and core configuration (solrconfig.xml, schema.xml, > synonyms.txt etc) in Cassandra, being distributed and replicated among the > various nodes, and eventually for us, multiple data centers is fantastic. > > Jeff > > On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Walter Underwood wrote: > >> On Apr 27, 2012, at 12:39 PM, Radim Kolar wrote: >> >>> Dne 27.4.2012 19:59, Jeremy Taylor napsal(a): >>>> DataStax offers a Solr integration that isn't master/slave and is >>>> NearRealTimes. >>> its rebranded solandra? >> >> No, it is a rewrite. >> >> http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cassandra-with-solr-integration-details >> >> wunder >> -- >> Walter Underwood >> wun...@wunderwood.org >> >> >> > > > > -- > Jeff Schmidt > 535 Consulting > j...@535consulting.com > http://www.535consulting.com > (650) 423-1068 > > > > > > > > >
