__
From: Michael Gibney
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 8:30 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr using all available CPU and becoming unresponsive
Hi Jeremy,
Can you share your analysis chain configs? (SOLR-13336 can manifest in a
similar way, and w
nd SynonymGraphFilterFactory from the query section
> (and maybe the StopFilterFactory from the index section as well)?
>
> Thanks again,
> Jeremy
>
>
> From: Michael Gibney
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 8:30 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.o
e query section (and maybe the
StopFilterFactory from the index section as well)?
Thanks again,
Jeremy
From: Michael Gibney
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 8:30 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr using all available CPU and becoming unresponsive
ith an issue where solr will intermittently
> use all available CPU and become unresponsive. It will remain in this
> state until we restart. Solr will remain stable for some time, usually a
> few hours to a few days, before this happens again. We've tried adjusting
> the cach
Hello all,
We have been struggling with an issue where solr will intermittently use
all available CPU and become unresponsive. It will remain in this state until
we restart. Solr will remain stable for some time, usually a few hours to a
few days, before this happens again. We've
On 5/10/2019 4:26 PM, Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
We are wanting to tweak the logging levels of our Solr 7.4 nodes to see what
might be helpful to add to the solr.log for debugging purposes.
In investigating what is available, however, I run /solr/admin/info/logging and I find that
We are wanting to tweak the logging levels of our Solr 7.4 nodes to see what
might be helpful to add to the solr.log for debugging purposes.
In investigating what is available, however, I run /solr/admin/info/logging and
I find that there is little consistency in what logging settings are
I noticed some were out a few days ago, but I don't think they're all there
yet (mine isn't)
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:46 PM Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Thanks Alex, and thanks to everyone who was part of organizing the
> conference!
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at
Thanks Alex, and thanks to everyone who was part of organizing the
conference!
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:28 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> For all those who wanted to be at the conference for the talks :-) but
> could not:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hm98XL0Mw5c&list=PLU6n9Voqu_1HW8-
For all those who wanted to be at the conference for the talks :-) but
could not:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hm98XL0Mw5c&list=PLU6n9Voqu_1HW8-VavVMa9lP8-oF8Oh5t
(Plug) Mine was: "JSON in Solr: from top to bottom", video at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzYbTe3-nFI , slides at:
https://www.
ers from
process space and the next access will segmentation fault your JVM.
The Snapshot deletion policy keeps the last commits available on disk,
so the "delete-on-last-close" behaviour by POSIX is not required. But
you have to take care to delete snapshots when you have closed all
r
displayed at web console is : no
locks available
My replica folders reside in an nfs mount, I am using RHEL 6/CentOS6.8. Has
anyone ever faced this issue?
Lucene-based software (including Solr) does NOT work well on NFS. NFS
does not provide all the locking functionality that Lucene tries to
locks available
My replica folders reside in an nfs mount, I am using RHEL 6/CentOS6.8. Has
anyone ever faced this issue?
regards,
Imran
--
I.R
Thanks Shawn. That makes sense.
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/9/2018 2:38 PM, Andy C wrote:
> > Was not quite sure from reading the JIRA why the Zookeeper team felt the
> > issue was so critical that they felt the need to pull the release from
> > their mirrors.
>
>
On 5/9/2018 2:38 PM, Andy C wrote:
> Was not quite sure from reading the JIRA why the Zookeeper team felt the
> issue was so critical that they felt the need to pull the release from
> their mirrors.
If somebody upgrades their servers from an earlier 3.4.x release to
3.4.11, then 3.4.11 might be u
their
> mirror sites (this appears to be due to a serious bug in ZK 3.4.11 -
> ZOOKEEPER-2960) <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2960> .
> Only 3.4.10 and 3.4.12 are available.
>
> Not quite sure how to proceed. Can I use ZK 3.4.10 or 3.4.12 with Solr 7.3?
> Or sh
hat has been pulled from the mirrors. Any plans to move
> to ZK 3.4.12 in future releases?
>
> Thanks,
> - Andy -
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
>
>> That bug isn't all that critical, at worst you may have to invert
&g
wrote:
> That bug isn't all that critical, at worst you may have to invert
> where your two directories point.
>
> 3.4.11 is available from https://archive.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Andy C wrote:
> > Accordin
That bug isn't all that critical, at worst you may have to invert
where your two directories point.
3.4.11 is available from https://archive.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/
Best,
Erick
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Andy C wrote:
> According to the 7.3 release notes I should be using Z
960> .
Only 3.4.10 and 3.4.12 are available.
Not quite sure how to proceed. Can I use ZK 3.4.10 or 3.4.12 with Solr 7.3?
Or should I try to find an archived version of ZK 3.4.11 somewhere?
Will Solr 7.3.1 or 7.4 be integrated with ZK 3.4.12? If so, what is the
expected time frame for these re
rote:
> Hi ,
>
> I am getting the below error when I try to connect solr nodes using
> zookeeper cluster. Can you please help me to debug this.
>
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live SolrServers
> available to handle this request:[http://10.0.3.73:
Hi ,
I am getting the below error when I try to connect solr nodes using
zookeeper cluster. Can you please help me to debug this.
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live SolrServers
available to handle this request:[http://10.0.3.73:8983/solr/collectioname,
http://10.0.3.181
score, highlight,etc) then put it
> >> into
> >>> solrquery.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Selvam Raman
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> When i am firing query it returns the doc as expected. (Example:
> >>>> q=synthesis)
> >&
t; >> UpdatingPartsofDocuments-OptimisticConcurrency
> >> If the content in the _version_ field is less than '0' (i.e., '-1'),
> then
> >> the document must *not* exist. In this case, no version matching occurs,
> >> but if the document exists,
ot* exist. In this case, no version matching occurs,
>> but if the document exists, the updates will be rejected.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 4:23 PM, kumar gaurav wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I need to update documents partially to solr only
lr only if it is already
> present
> > there . But the problem is it creates a new document if document not
> > available .
> >
> > Please help someone .
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > regards
> > Kumar Gaurav
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
>
the document exists, the updates will be rejected.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 4:23 PM, kumar gaurav wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need to update documents partially to solr only if it is already present
> there . But the problem is it creates a new document if document not
> available .
&
Hi
I need to update documents partially to solr only if it is already present
there . But the problem is it creates a new document if document not
available .
Please help someone .
Thanks
regards
Kumar Gaurav
gt;>> I am setting up lot of fields (fq, score, highlight,etc) then put it
>> into
>>> solrquery.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Selvam Raman wrote:
>>>
>>>> When i am firing query it returns the doc as expected. (Example:
>&g
:22 AM, Selvam Raman wrote:
> >
> >> When i am firing query it returns the doc as expected. (Example:
> >> q=synthesis)
> >>
> >> I am facing the problem when i include wildcard character in the query.
> >> (Example: q=synthesi*)
> >>
wildcard character in the query.
>> (Example: q=synthesi*)
>>
>>
>> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException:
>> Error from server at http://localhost:8983/solr/Metadata2:
>> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerE
ple: q=synthesi*)
>
>
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException:
> Error from server at http://localhost:8983/solr/Metadata2:
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
>
> No live SolrServers available to handle this request:[/solr/Metadata2_
> shard1_replica1,
>
/Metadata2:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
No live SolrServers available to handle this
request:[/solr/Metadata2_shard1_replica1,
solr/Metadata2_shard2_replica2,
solr/Metadata2_shard1_replica2]
--
Selvam Raman
"லஞ்சம் தவிர்த்து நெஞ்சம் நிமிர்த்து"
gt; To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: Jason Carter
> Subject: Is there a way to determine fields available for faceting for a
> search without doing the faceting?
>
> Hey all!
>
> Is there a way to determine fields available for faceting (those with
> data) for a s
Hey all!
Is there a way to determine fields available for faceting (those with
data) for a search without actually doing the faceting for the fields?
-Mike/NewsRx
task-2]
ERROR com.sial.catalog.material.search.MaterialSearch - Solr encountered an
error No live SolrServers available to handle this request:[
http://uc1a-ecomdev-msc01:8983/solr/sial-catalog-material]
09:16:35,957 INFO [stdout] (default task-2) 09:16:35.957 [default task-2]
ERROR com.sial.catalog.material.search.M
add an "available" field, and for the documents not
available you index them as "not available" ( and in case the situation
change you can update them) .
In this case you can simply query and then filter by "available :false" .
Cheers
--
View this message in con
kson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 11:18 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Best and efficient way to find out whether set of records
available in Solr
bq: if below are the records available in solr, I need to whether id
with values 3,4,5,6 are available in solr or not
This
bq: if below are the records available in solr, I need to whether id
with values 3,4,5,6 are available in solr or not
This just doesn't make sense to me. _How_ do you decide you want to
know certain docs aren't available? What relation is there between the
presence of docs 1, 2 and
Hi,
I have an use case where I need to find out whether a set of records
are available in Solr. Please suggest best and efficient way to achieve it. Any
suggestions are appreciated.
For eg : if below are the records available in solr, I need to whether
id with values 3,4,5,6
I am available for consulting projects if your project needs help.
Been doing Solr work for 6 years...
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
That shard did receive update request, because it shows in the log.
And also commit request.
But no documents indexed.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Jerome Yang wrote:
> I'm sure I send documents to that shard. And execute commit.
>
> I also use curl to index, but not error occurred and no do
I'm sure I send documents to that shard. And execute commit.
I also use curl to index, but not error occurred and no documents are
indexed.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Are all the documents in the collection? By using implicit router, you are
> assuming control of
Are all the documents in the collection? By using implicit router, you are
assuming control of what shard each document ends up on. So my
guess is that you are not routing the docs to each shard.
If you want Solr to automatically assign the shard to a doc, you should
be using the default composite
Hi all,
The situation is:
Three hosts, host1, host2, host3. Solr version 6.1 in cloud mode. 8 solr
nodes on each host.
Create a collection using implicit router. Execute index and delete index.
The collection works fine.
Then kill 3 nodes, some of shards change leader.
Then index data to new lead
Thanks Shawn and Elaine,
Elaine,
Yes all the documents of same route key resides on same shard.
Shawn,
I will try to capture the logs.
Thanks.
Regards,
Anil
On 25 March 2016 at 02:57, Elaine Cario wrote:
> Anil,
>
> I've seen situations where if there was a problem with a specific query,
>
Anil,
I've seen situations where if there was a problem with a specific query,
and every shard responds with the same error, the actual exception gets
hidden by a "No live SolrServers..." exception. We originally saw this
with wildcard queries (when every shard reported a "too many expansions...
On 3/17/2016 4:22 AM, Anil wrote:
> We are using solrcloud with zookeeper and each collection has 5 shareds and
> 2 replicas.
> we are seeing "org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live
> SolrServers available to handle this request". i dont see any issues wit
On 3/18/2016 9:55 PM, Anil wrote:
> Thanks for your response.
> CDH is a Cloudera (third party) distribution. is there any to get the
> notifications copy of it when cluster state changed ? in logs ?
>
> I can assume that the exception is result of no availability of replicas
> only. Agree?
Yes, I
wrote:
> What query do you try?
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Anil wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> > We are using solrcloud with zookeeper and each collection has 5 shareds
> and
> > 2 replicas.
> > we are seeing "org.apache.solr.client.solrj.Solr
zookeeper and each collection has 5 shareds
> and
> > 2 replicas.
> > we are seeing "org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live
> > SolrServers available to handle this request". i dont see any issues with
> > replicas.
> >
> > what wo
On 3/17/2016 11:29 PM, Anil wrote:
> Thanks Shawn. we are using 4.10.3.
>
> I don't see any issues with replicas of all shards at the time of
> exception. health of all shards is good in CDH.
I do not know what CDH is. I'm guessing it's third-party software. As
far as I'm aware, Solr doesn't hav
What query do you try?
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Anil wrote:
> HI,
>
> We are using solrcloud with zookeeper and each collection has 5 shareds and
> 2 replicas.
> we are seeing "org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live
> SolrServers available to
; We are using solrcloud with zookeeper and each collection has 5 shareds
>> and
>> > 2 replicas.
>> > we are seeing "org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live
>> > SolrServers available to handle this request". i dont see any issues
>> with
>> > replicas.
>> >
>> > what would be root cause of the exception ? Thanks.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Anil
>> >
>>
>
>
HI Shawn,
Thanks for your response.
CDH is a Cloudera (third party) distribution. is there any to get the
notifications copy of it when cluster state changed ? in logs ?
I can assume that the exception is result of no availability of replicas
only. Agree?
Regards,
Anil
On 18 March 2016 at 18:20
HI,
We are using solrcloud with zookeeper and each collection has 5 shareds and
2 replicas.
we are seeing "org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live
SolrServers available to handle this request". i dont see any issues with
replicas.
what would be root cause of the
On 3/5/2016 12:00 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> Not having docValues is actually why you got the error.When I
> encountered this error last year, I opened this issue:
Reading back through the message thread, I noticed that you never
actually included log entries with an error about the incorrect
d
On 3/4/2016 10:44 PM, Mugeesh Husain wrote:
> Thank for you consideration, I noticed all of the answer is docvalues
> related but i did not define any docvalue type in my schema that why i am
> little bit confuse.
Not having docValues is actually why you got the error.When I
encountered this e
do you have any idea
> > how
> > we resolve these issue ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exception-SolrServerException-No-live-SolrServers-available-to-handle-this-request-tp4258898p
is working fine. do you have any idea
> how
> we resolve these issue ?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exception-SolrServerException-No-live-SolrServers-available-to-handle-this-request-tp4258898p4260518.html
>
Hi Elaine, Thank for your reply
I did try without grouping then it is working fine. do you have any idea how
we resolve these issue ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exception-SolrServerException-No-live-SolrServers-available-to-handle-this-request
s type NUMERIC for field 'year' (expected=SORTED) exception. Still
> i
> am suffering what is the issue
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exception-SolrServerException-No-live-SolrServers-available-to-handle-this-reques
search. Solr is highly scalable, providing fault tolerant distributed
search and indexing, and powers the search and navigation features of many
of the world's largest internet sites.
Solr 5.5.0 is available for immediate download at:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/mirrors-solr-latest-redir
on-No-live-SolrServers-available-to-handle-this-request-tp4258898p4259205.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gt; if it is coming some docvalues ,Actuallly i am trying to fetchgrouping
> record in ro field.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exception-SolrServerException-No-live-SolrServers-available-to-handle-this-request-tp4258898p425902
aclVersion = 0
ephemeralOwner = 0x0
dataLength = 2
numChildren = 0
if it is coming some docvalues ,Actuallly i am trying to fetchgrouping
record in ro field.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exception-SolrServerException-No-live-SolrServers-available-to-handle-this
t;_id:(1 3 2)",
> "indent":"true",
> "fl":"ro",
> "group.ngroups":"true",
> "wt":"json",
> "group.field":"ro",
> "group":"true"
quot;indent":"true",
"fl":"ro",
"group.ngroups":"true",
"wt":"json",
"group.field":"ro",
"group":"true"}},
"error":{
"ms
SOLR
posting.
We want to detect the health of each core —- whether they are available to
post. We have to figure out ways to do that：
1. Using luke request . —- Cost is a bit high for core loading
2. We have designed a cache and adding the hook when the core is open or
closed to record
Hi All,
Our team is using the Solr to process log and we met a problem in SOLR
posting.
We want to detect the health of each core —- whether they are available to
post. We have to figure out ways to do that：
1. Using luke request . —- Cost is a bit high for core loading
2. We have
. When
running MRIT (without specifying any number of mappers or reducers), this
would result in 16 mappers and 6 reducers. At the time, I didn't put much
thought into where those numbers were coming from. I just figured those
were the available slots my cluster was reporting.
Now, after growin
rote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm very new handle the solrcloud.
> > I've changed the scema.xml with adding field to index but after reload
> the
> > collection we got error from logging " No live SolrServers available to
> > handle this reque
;
> I'm very new handle the solrcloud.
> I've changed the scema.xml with adding field to index but after reload the
> collection we got error from logging " No live SolrServers available to
> handle this request".
>
> i have check solrcloud from localhost each node
Hi All,
I'm very new handle the solrcloud.
I've changed the scema.xml with adding field to index but after reload the
collection we got error from logging " No live SolrServers available to
handle this request".
i have check solrcloud from localhost each node and running
e loaded the Films data into a 4 node cluster. Indexing went well,
> but
> > when I issue a query, I get this:
> >
> > "error": {
> > "msg": "org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live
> > SolrServers available to handl
olr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live
> SolrServers available to handle this request:
> [
>
> http://host-192-168-0-63.openstacklocal:8081/solr/CollectionFilms_shard1_replica2
> ,
>
>
> http://host-192-168-0-62.openstacklocal:8081/solr/CollectionFilms_shard2
I've loaded the Films data into a 4 node cluster. Indexing went well, but
when I issue a query, I get this:
"error": {
"msg": "org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live
SolrServers available to handle this request:
[
http://host-192-168
thanks, Shalin! We have survived by passing our custom structure string in
Json. Still to be tested for performance.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Or use the XsltResponseWriter :)
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
Or use the XsltResponseWriter :)
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> No, I'm afraid you will have to extend the XmlResponseWriter in that case.
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
>> Shalin,
>>
>> Thanks, can I also introduce custom entity tags like i
No, I'm afraid you will have to extend the XmlResponseWriter in that case.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Shalin,
>
> Thanks, can I also introduce custom entity tags like in my example with the
> highlighter output?
>
> Dmitry
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Shalin Shekha
Shalin,
Thanks, can I also introduce custom entity tags like in my example with the
highlighter output?
Dmitry
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The thing is that you are trying to introduce custom xml tags which
> require changing the resp
The thing is that you are trying to introduce custom xml tags which
require changing the response writers. Instead, if you just used
nested maps/lists or SimpleOrderedMap/NamedList then every response
writer should be able to just directly write the output. Nesting is
not a problem.
On Fri, Aug 7,
Shawn:
thanks, we found an intermediate solution by serializing our data structure
using string representation, perhaps less optimal than using binary format
directly.
In the original router with JavaBinCodec we found, that
BinaryResponseWriter should also be extended. But the following method is
What do you mean by a custom format? As long as your custom component
is writing primitives or NamedList/SimpleOrderedMap or collections
such as List/Map, any response writer should be able to handle them.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Solr: 5.2.1
> class: org.apa
Hi,
I couldn't find anything suspicious. It was allowed to highlight on an
indexed="false" field as long as a tokenizer defined on it:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Field+Properties+by+Use+Case
May be that is changed. Can you try to highlight on a both indexed and stored
fie
Hi,
I checked and for me config looks alright but if you can take a look it
will be great.
Here is whole solrconfig.xml:
http://pastebin.com/7YfVZA90
and here is full schema.xml:
http://pastebin.com/LgeAvtFf
and query result with enabled debug:
http://pastebin.com/i74Wyep3
Hi,
bq: I don't even see highlighting section in results
I mean, it is possible that you are hitting a request/search handler that does
not have highlighting component registered. This is possible when you
explicitly register components (query, facet, highlighting etc).
Lets first make sure i
Thank you for answer. When I execute the query using q=Warszawa&df=text_index
instead of q=text_index:Warszawa nothing changed. If I remove wt=json from
query I got response in xml but also without highlight results.
On 8/5/2015 5:38 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> Solr: 5.2.1
> class: org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec
>
> I'm working on a custom data structure for the highlighter. The data
> structure is ready in JSON and XML formats. I need also JavaBin format. The
> data structure is already made serializable
Hello,
Solr: 5.2.1
class: org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec
I'm working on a custom data structure for the highlighter. The data
structure is ready in JSON and XML formats. I need also JavaBin format. The
data structure is already made serializable by extending the WritableValue
class (met
Hi,
Your response says wt=json, but your solrconfig excerpt says wt=velocity.
May be you are hitting a different request handler?
What happens when you submit your query as q=Warszawa&df=text_index
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 8:28 AM, Michał Oleś wrote:
I installed solr 5.2.1 and use dih ex
I installed solr 5.2.1 and use dih example with tika integration to search
for pdf content. Everything work as expected except highlighting plugin.
When I execute the query I don't even see highlighting section in results:
{
"responseHeader": {
"status": 0,
"QTime": 1,
"params": {
in 4.7.2).
>> >
>> >1.
>> >
>> >Start solr with zookeeper embedded.
>> >
>> >java -DzkRun -Djetty.port=8985 -jar start.jar
>> >2.
>> >
>> >upload a config into Zookeeper (same config as the stand
ectory with the
> > appropriate core.properties
> >
> > But when I go to http://localhost:8985/solr/#/~cloud, I see that the two
> > shards' status is "Down" when they are supposed to be active by default.
> >
> > And when I try to index documents
lhost:8985/solr/#/~cloud, I see that the two
> shards' status is "Down" when they are supposed to be active by default.
>
> And when I try to index documents in them using SolrJ (via CloudSolrServer
> API) , I get the error "No live SolrServers available to hand
to http://localhost:8985/solr/#/~cloud, I see that the two
shards' status is "Down" when they are supposed to be active by default.
And when I try to index documents in them using SolrJ (via CloudSolrServer
API) , I get the error "No live SolrServers available to handle t
t; On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Would like to check, is there any way to show the list of collections
> that
> > are available in the Solr server and output it onto a JSON format? I
> could
> > not managed to find any documentation on this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Edwin
> >
>
hat
> are available in the Solr server and output it onto a JSON format? I could
> not managed to find any documentation on this.
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
Hi,
Would like to check, is there any way to show the list of collections that
are available in the Solr server and output it onto a JSON format? I could
not managed to find any documentation on this.
Regards,
Edwin
Hi,
I am misspelling a query "hota hai" to "hota hain". Inside
collations, "hota hai" is not coming, instead of that "hot main, home have.
etc" are coming. I have 37 documents where "hota hai" is present.
*URL: *localhost:8983/solr/wikingram/spell?q=gram_ci:"hota
hain"&wt=json&indent=true&
1 - 100 of 376 matches
Mail list logo
