requests per keystroke. Do let me know for any other queries.
:)
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 22:10, Moyer, Brett wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Looking to see how others accomplished this goal. We have a 3 Tier
> architecture, Solr is down deep in T3 far from the end user. How do you
> ma
Hello,
Looking to see how others accomplished this goal. We have a 3 Tier
architecture, Solr is down deep in T3 far from the end user. How do you make
Auto-Suggest calls from the Internet Browser through the Tiers down to Solr in
T3? We essentially created steps down each tier, but I&#
information of Verint Systems Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries. The
> information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or
> entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive this e-mail for the intended recipient), you may not
> us
Hi,
I am quite new to solr and I am interested in implementing a sort of auto terms
suggest (not auto complete) feature based on the user query.
Users builds some query (on multiple fields) and I am trying to help him
refining his query by suggesting to add more terms based on his current query.
t; make
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> dictionary. The default value is 2. Increasing this would mean you
> >>>> want
> >>>>>>> more than the previous 2 tokens to be taken into consideration when
> >>>> making
> >>>&g
ant
>>>>>>> more than the previous 2 tokens to be taken into consideration when
>>>> making
>>>>>>> the suggestions. "
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This makes me confused, as I was not expecting this para
t;>>>> This makes me confused, as I was not expecting this param to affect the
>>>>> suggestion dictionary.
>>>>> So I would like a clarification here from our masters :)
>>>>> At this point let's see what happens at query time .
>>>>
gt;> >> As my understanding the ngrams params will consider the last N-1
>> tokens
>> >> the user put separated by the space separator.
>> >>
>> >> "Builds an ngram model from the text sent to {@link
>> >>> * #build} and predicts b
link
> >>> * #build} and predicts based on the last grams-1 tokens in
> >>> * the request sent to {@link #lookup}. This tries to
> >>> * handle the "long tail" of suggestions for when the
> >>> * incoming query is a never before seen qu
t;
>> Example , grams=3 should consider only the last 2 tokens
>>
>> special mp3 p -> mp3 p
>>
>> Then this query is analysed using the "suggestFreeTextAnalyzerFieldType" .
>> We produce 3 tokens :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> A
gt;
>
>
> And we run the prefix matching on the FST .
>
> *Conclusion*
> My understanding is wrong for sure at some point, as the behaviour I get
> is different.
> Can we discuss this , clarify this and eventually put it in the official
> documentation ?
>
> Cheers
uld consider only the last 2 tokens
>
> special mp3 p -> mp3 p
>
> Then this query is analysed using the "suggestFreeTextAnalyzerFieldType" .
> We produce 3 tokens :
>
>
>
>
> And we run the prefix matching on the FST .
>
> *Conclusion*
> My un
hould consider only the last 2 tokens
>
> special mp3 p -> mp3 p
>
> Then this query is analysed using the "suggestFreeTextAnalyzerFieldType" .
> We produce 3 tokens :
>
>
>
>
> And we run the prefix matching on the FST .
>
> *Conclusion*
> My unde
TextAnalyzerFieldType" .
We produce 3 tokens :
And we run the prefix matching on the FST .
*Conclusion*
My understanding is wrong for sure at some point, as the behaviour I get is
different.
Can we discuss this , clarify this and eventually put it in the official
documentation ?
Cheers
I'm implementing an auto-suggest feature in Solr, and I'll like to achieve
the follwing:
For example, if the user enters "mp3", Solr might suggest "mp3 player",
"mp3 nano" and "mp3 music".
When the user enters "mp3 p", the suggestion
Any one find any solution for this probleme ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-with-adding-accents-tp4150379p4150972.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ge in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-with-adding-accents-tp4150379p4150609.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
;> &
>> > query time.
>> >
>> > Otis
>> > --
>> > Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
>> > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Ju
xt.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:49 PM, benjelloun <[hidden email]
> > <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4150410&i=0>> wrote:
> >
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > q="gene"
i=0>> wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > q="gene" it suggest "geneve"
> > ASCIIFoldingFilter work like isolate accent
> >
> > what i need to suggest is "genève"
> >
> > any idea?
> >
> > thanks
> &
quot;gene" it suggest "geneve"
> ASCIIFoldingFilter work like isolate accent
>
> what i need to suggest is "genève"
>
> any idea?
>
> thanks
> best reagards
> Anass BENJELLOUN
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.
hi,
q="gene" it suggest "geneve"
ASCIIFoldingFilter work like isolate accent
what i need to suggest is "genève"
any idea?
thanks
best reagards
Anass BENJELLOUN
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-with-adding-accen
textSuggest
suggests
true
suggestDic
true
6
true
6
true
suggests
The field "suggestField" dont isolate accents.
Thanks for help,
Best regards,
Anass BENJELLOUN
--
View this message in co
suggests
The field "suggestField" dont isolate accents.
Thanks for help,
Best regards,
Anass BENJELLOUN
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-with-adding-accents-tp4150379.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello Erick,
So in your opinion what is the solution to use autosuggest with sentece :)
an exemple will be very helpfull,
Thanks,
best regards,
Anass BENJELLOUN
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-Suggest-tp4149004p4149441.html
Sent from the Solr - User
ggestComponent work on MultiValued Field to Auto suggest not
> only
> one word but the whole sentence?
>
> indexed="true"/>
>
> Regards,
> Anass BENJELLOUN
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-Suggest-
Hello,
Did solr.SuggestComponent work on MultiValued Field to Auto suggest not only
one word but the whole sentence?
Regards,
Anass BENJELLOUN
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-Suggest-tp4149004.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
Sorry, I forgot the link:
[1] - http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ
- Mensaje original -
De: "Ing. Jorge Luis Betancourt Gonzalez"
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Enviados: Martes, 1 de Octubre 2013 13:34:03
Asunto: Re: Auto Suggest - Time decay
For that core
omatically boosted by date.
PS: You could tweak the above formula used in the boost parameter for a more
suitable to your needs.
- Mensaje original -
De: "SolrLover"
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Enviados: Martes, 1 de Octubre 2013 12:19:51
Asunto: Re: Auto Suggest - Time
I am using a totally separate core for storing the auto suggest keywords.
Would you be able to send me some more details on your implementation?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-Suggest-Time-decay-tp4092965p4092969.html
Sent from the Solr - User
ot;
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Enviados: Martes, 1 de Octubre 2013 12:12:13
Asunto: Auto Suggest - Time decay
I am trying to implement an auto suggest based on time decay function. I have
a separate index just to store auto suggest keywords.
I would be calculating the frequency over time r
I am trying to implement an auto suggest based on time decay function. I have
a separate index just to store auto suggest keywords.
I would be calculating the frequency over time rather than just calculating
just based on frequency alone.
I am thinking of using a database to perform the
Seems like this feature is still yet to be implemented..
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-866
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-Suggest-spell-check-dictionary-replication-to-slave-issue-tp4068562p4068739.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Hi All,
We create 2 dictionary's from a indexed field for auto-sugest, spell check
feature. When we configured replication from master to slave's index is
replicating properly but not the auto-suggest, spell check dictionary's.
Is there a way to replicate auto-suggest, spell c
ext:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Where-is-the-auto-suggest-function-gone-tp4045520p4045531.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
but there are no suggestions.
> What I need to adjust to make this work again?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Where-is-the-auto-suggest-function-gone-tp4045520.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
make this work again?
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Where-is-the-auto-suggest-function-gone-tp4045520.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I think this is because of the space observed - facet.prefix= "empty
string" - Please see below
3
3
3
3
3
... so on
*But why is this space inserted?* If you see below, the list of keywords
taken from search results , there is no space.
Thanks & Regards
Rajani
On Fri, Aug
Hi All,
* When I do facet.prefix on a * KEYWORDS *field(this field is multi
valued) , I don't get suggestion for the first key in this field . *
Example :
I have 2 documents with the field "KEYWORDS" containing multiple values.
偏振式3D成像原理
采用LED边缘发光的新技术
高级降噪运算法及画质增强技术可
紧凑机身，轻松携带
节能低耗，持久续航
case sensitive.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3937370.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
Is it true that faceting is case sensitive? That would be disastrous for our
requirement :(
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3937370.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
might also share permissions to same files and folders. I understand
my requirement is a little complicated.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3937368.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Another option is to use faceting (via the facet.prefix param) for your
auto-suggest. It's not as fast and scalable as using one of the
Suggester implementations, but it does allow arbitrary fq parameters to
be included in the request to limit the results.
http://wiki.apache.org
purposes once the index is created.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3936144.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3936144.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
lable for
filtering purposes once the index is created.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3936144.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
r this user. So, ultimately I would like to include the userName in the
query. As mentioned earlier, userName is another field in the main index.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3935765.html
Sen
--
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3935765.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in this scenario 'fq' parameter will f
ame in
the query. As mentioned earlier, userName is another field in the main
index.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3935765.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
can you please share a sample query?
-Jeevanandam
On 24-04-2012 1:49 pm, prakash_ajp wrote:
I am trying to implement an auto-suggest feature. The search feature
already
exists and searches on file content in user's allotted workspace.
The following is from my schema that will be use
I am trying to implement an auto-suggest feature. The search feature already
exists and searches on file content in user's allotted workspace.
The following is from my schema that will be used for search indexing:
The search result is filtered by the user name. The sugge
Hi,
Sure, you can use filters and facets for this. Start a query with
...&facet.field=source&facet.field=topics&facet.field=type
When you click a "button", you set the corresponding filter (fq=source:people),
and the new query will return the same facets with new counts. In the Audi
example, yo
I don't even know what to call this feature. Here's a website that shows
the problem:
http://pulse.audiusanews.com/pulse/index.php
Notice that you can end up in a situation where there are no results.
For example,
in order, press: People, Performance, Technology, Photos. The client
wants it so th
--- On Tue, 5/3/11, Charton, Andre wrote:
>
> yes we do.
>
> If you use a limit number of categories (like 100) you can
> use dynamic fields with the termscomponent and by choosing a
> category specific prefix, like:
>
> {schema.xml}
> ...
> indexed="true" stored="false" multiValued="true"
>
s
André Charton
-Original Message-
From: Eric Grobler [mailto:impalah...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 9:56 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ebay Kleinanzeigen and Auto Suggest
Hi Otis,
The new Solr 3.1 Suggester also does not support filter queries.
Is anyo
ene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Eric Grobler
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Tue, April 26, 2011 1:11:11 PM
> > Subject: Ebay Kleinanzeigen and Auto Suggest
> >
> > Hi
> >
&g
ginal Message
> > From: Eric Grobler
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Tue, April 26, 2011 1:11:11 PM
> > Subject: Ebay Kleinanzeigen and Auto Suggest
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Someone told me that ebay is using solr.
> > I was looking at their
ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Eric Grobler
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, April 26, 2011 1:11:11 PM
> Subject: Ebay Kleinanzeigen and Auto Suggest
>
> Hi
>
> Someone told me that ebay is using solr.
> I
Hi
Someone told me that ebay is using solr.
I was looking at their Auto Suggest implementation and I guess they are
using Shingles and the TermsComponent.
I managed to get a satisfactory implementation but I have a problem with
category specific filtering.
Ebay suggestions are sensitive to
; Hi Erick,
>
> If you have time, Can you please take a look and provide your comments (or)
> suggestions for this problem?
>
> Please let me know if you need any more information.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Johnny
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.4720
Hi Erick,
If you have time, Can you please take a look and provide your comments (or)
suggestions for this problem?
Please let me know if you need any more information.
Thanks,
Johnny
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/EdgeNgram-Auto-suggest-doubles-ignore
x it is
mentioned in WIKI.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
Am I going wrong anywhere?
Please let me know if you need any more info.
Thanks,
Johnny
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/EdgeNgram-Auto-suggest-doubles-ignore-tp2321919p2399330.html
Sent f
le milk shake" ]
>
> and If i search for "apple", it should return only "apple milk shake"
> because that term alone starts with the letter "apple" which I typed in. It
> should not bring others and if I type "milk" it should return only "mi
Right now our configuration says multivalues=true. But that need not be
"true" in our case. Will make it false and try and update this thread with
more details..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/EdgeNgram-Auto-suggest-doubles-ignore-tp2321919p2334627
value, or multiple? I still get confused about how to do it
with edgegrams, even with single-valued field, but I think maybe it's
possible.
_Definitely_ possible, with or without edgegrams, if you are
willing/able to make a completely seperate Solr index where each term
for auto-suggest
word only. For example, when we type "M", it should return
"Mumford and Sons" and not "jackson Michael".
Jonathan,
Is it possible to achieve this when we have separate index using edgeNgram?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/
I typed in.
> > It should not bring others and if I type "milk" it should return only
> > "milk with apple"
> >
> > I want an output Similar like a Google auto suggest.
> >
> > Is there a way to achieve this without encapsulating with double quotes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Johnny
if I type "milk" it should return only "milk
> with apple"
>
> I want an output Similar like a Google auto suggest.
>
> Is there a way to achieve this without encapsulating with double quotes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Johnny
I haven't figured out any way to achieve that AT ALL without making a
seperate Solr index just to serve autosuggest queries. At least when you
want to auto-suggest on a multi-value field. Someone posted a crazy
tricky way to do it with a single-valued field a while ago. If you
can/are wi
tter "apple" which I typed in. It
should not bring others and if I type "milk" it should return only "milk
with apple"
I want an output Similar like a Google auto suggest.
Is there a way to achieve this without encapsulating with double quotes.
Thanks,
Johnny
--
>
> When I search for the term "apple".
>
> It is returning results for "pineapple vers apple", "milk with apple",
> "apple milk shake" ...
>
> Is there any other way to overcome this problem?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Johnny
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/EdgeNgram-Auto-suggest-doubles-ignore-tp2321919p2329370.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
the term "apple".
It is returning results for "pineapple vers apple", "milk with apple",
"apple milk shake" ...
Is there any other way to overcome this problem?
Thanks,
Johnny
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.c
See below.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:51 PM, johnnyisrael wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying out the auto suggest using EdgeNgram.
>
> Using the following tutorial as a reference.
>
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-u
Hi,
I am trying out the auto suggest using EdgeNgram.
Using the following tutorial as a reference.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
In the above tutorial, The below two lines has been clearly mentioned,
"Note that
, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Jason Rutherglen
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Analysis returns "app mou".
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Lance Norskog
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>
>>
>>>> What does analysis.jsp show?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Jason Rutherglen
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm having a different issue with the EdgeNGram technique described
>>
lete to our mod_perl servers, Results were
> cached in the mod_perl servers.
>
> Regards,
> Dan
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Jason Rutherglen > wrote:
>
>> I'm having a different issue with the EdgeNGram technique described
>> here:
>&g
mod_perl servers, Results were
cached in the mod_perl servers.
Regards,
Dan
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
> I'm having a different issue with the EdgeNGram technique described
> here:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-p
show?
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Jason Rutherglen
wrote:
I'm having a different issue with the EdgeNGram technique described
here:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
That is one word queries q=app on the query_text
Sep 2, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
>> What does analysis.jsp show?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Jason Rutherglen
>> wrote:
>>> I'm having a different issue with the EdgeNGram technique described
>>> here:
>>> http://www.lu
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
>>
>> That is one word queries q=app on the query_text field, work fine
>> however "q=app mou" do not. Why would this be or is there a
>> configuration that
son Rutherglen wrote:
> I'm having a different issue with the EdgeNGram technique described
> here:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
>
> That is one word queries q=app on the query_text field, work fine
> h
What does analysis.jsp show?
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Jason Rutherglen
wrote:
> I'm having a different issue with the EdgeNGram technique described
> here:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
>
> That i
I'm having a different issue with the EdgeNGram technique described
here:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
That is one word queries q=app on the query_text field, work fine
however "q=app mou" do not. Why woul
the whole phrase as just one big term, the
> wildcard is very fast.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Grobler [mailto:impalah...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:35 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Auto Suggest
>
> Hi
you get SOLR to consider the whole phrase as just one big term, the
wildcard is very fast.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Grobler [mailto:impalah...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:35 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Auto Suggest
Hi Robert,
Interesting app
inal Message-
> From: Jazz Globe [mailto:jazzgl...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:33 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Auto Suggest
>
>
> Hallo
>
> How would one implement a multiple term auto-suggest feature in Solr
> that is filter s
o the
front end for display.
-Original Message-
From: Jazz Globe [mailto:jazzgl...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:33 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Auto Suggest
Hallo
How would one implement a multiple term auto-suggest feature in Solr
that is filter
Hallo
How would one implement a multiple term auto-suggest feature in Solr that is
filter sensitive?
For example, a user enters :
"mp3"
and solr might suggest:
-> "mp3 player"
-> "mp3 nano"
-> "mp3 sony"
and then the user starts t
Given below are the steps for auto-suggest and spellcheck in single query:
Make the change in TermComponent part in solrconfig.xml
true
termsComponent
spellcheck
Use given below query format for getting autosuggest and spellcheck
suggestion
Am 03.06.2010 16:45, schrieb Andrzej Bialecki:
> You are right to a certain degree. Still, there are some contention
> points in Lucene/Solr, how threads are allocated on available CPU-s, and
> how the heap is used, which can make a two-JVM setup perform much better
> than a single-JVM setup given
On 2010-06-03 13:38, Michael Kuhlmann wrote:
> Am 03.06.2010 13:02, schrieb Andrzej Bialecki:
>> ..., and deploy this
>> index in a separate JVM (to benefit from other CPUs than the one that
>> runs your Solr core)
>
> Every known webserver ist multithreaded by default, so putting different
> Solr
Am 03.06.2010 13:02, schrieb Andrzej Bialecki:
> ..., and deploy this
> index in a separate JVM (to benefit from other CPUs than the one that
> runs your Solr core)
Every known webserver ist multithreaded by default, so putting different
Solr instances into different JVMs will be of no use.
-Mich
On 2010-06-03 09:56, Michael Kuhlmann wrote:
> The only solution without "doing any custom work" would be to perform a
> normal query for each suggestion. But you might get into performance
> troubles with that, because suggestions are typically performed much
> more often than complete searches.
work would be to build up a
large TreeMap with each word as the keys, and the matching terms as the
values.
-Michael
Am 02.06.2010 22:01, schrieb Jay Hill:
> I've got a situation where I'm looking to build an auto-suggest where any
> term entered will lead to suggestions. For exampl
l.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 4:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Auto-suggest internal terms
I've got a situation where I'm looking to build an auto-suggest where
any
term entered will lead to suggestions. For example, if I type "wine" I
want
to see suggestions
ssage-
From: Jay Hill [mailto:jayallenh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 4:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Auto-suggest internal terms
I've got a situation where I'm looking to build an auto-suggest where any
term entered will lead to suggestions. For example,
I've got a situation where I'm looking to build an auto-suggest where any
term entered will lead to suggestions. For example, if I type "wine" I want
to see suggestions like this:
french *wine* classes
*wine* book discounts
burgundy *wine*
etc.
I've tried some tricks wi
ne searches for "Peter".
Since I will just use this for a prefix search, I could just set the query
analyzer to lowercase the search and it should find the results and I can then
add some magic to the frontend display logic to split off the suggested
original term.
I am not aware o
On 29.01.2010, at 15:40, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> I am still a bit unsure how to handle both the lowercased and the case
> preserved version:
>
> So here are some examples:
> UBS => ubs|UBS
> Kreuzstrasse => kreuzstrasse|Kreuzstrasse
>
> So when I type "Kreu" I would get a suggestion of "Kre
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
