Luke, Thanks. What happens if there are 3 terms? It seems like the entire query can go into facet.prefix?
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Luke Tebbs <l...@staffing-systems.co.uk> wrote: > What about if you do something like this? - > > facet=true&facet.mincount=1&q=apple&facet.limit=10&facet.prefix=mou&facet.field=term_suggest&qt=basic&wt=javabin&rows=0&version=1 > > > Jason Rutherglen wrote: >> >> To clarify, the query analyzer returns that. Variations such as >> "apple mou" also do not return anything. Maybe Jay can comment and >> then we can amend the article? >> >> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Jason Rutherglen >> <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Analysis returns "app mou". >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Lance Norskog <goks...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> What does analysis.jsp show? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Jason Rutherglen >>>> <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm having a different issue with the EdgeNGram technique described >>>>> here: >>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/ >>>>> >>>>> That is one word queries q=app on the query_text field, work fine >>>>> however "q=app mou" do not. Why would this be or is there a >>>>> configuration that could be missing? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Eric Grobler >>>>> <impalah...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for your feedback Robert, >>>>>> >>>>>> I will try that and see how Solr performs on my data - I think I will >>>>>> create >>>>>> a field that contains only important key/product terms from the text. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Johan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Robert Petersen <rober...@buy.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We don't have that many, just a hundred thousand, and solr response >>>>>>> times (since the index's docs are small and not complex) are logged >>>>>>> as >>>>>>> typically 1 ms if not 0 ms. It's funny but sometimes it is so fast >>>>>>> no >>>>>>> milliseconds have elapsed. Incredible if you ask me... :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once you get SOLR to consider the whole phrase as just one big term, >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> wildcard is very fast. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Eric Grobler [mailto:impalah...@googlemail.com] >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:35 PM >>>>>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Auto Suggest >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Robert, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Interesting approach, how many documents do you have in Solr? >>>>>>> I have about 2 million and I just wonder if it might be a bit slow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Johan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Robert Petersen <rober...@buy.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I do this by replacing the spaces with a '%' in a separate search >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> field >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> which is not parsed nor tokenized and then you can wildcard across >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> whole phrase like you want and the spaces don't mess you up. Just >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> store >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the original phrase with spaces in a separate field for returning to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> front end for display. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Jazz Globe [mailto:jazzgl...@hotmail.com] >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:33 AM >>>>>>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>> Subject: Auto Suggest >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hallo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How would one implement a multiple term auto-suggest feature in Solr >>>>>>>> that is filter sensitive? >>>>>>>> For example, a user enters : >>>>>>>> "mp3" >>>>>>>> and solr might suggest: >>>>>>>> -> "mp3 player" >>>>>>>> -> "mp3 nano" >>>>>>>> -> "mp3 sony" >>>>>>>> and then the user starts the second word : >>>>>>>> "mp3 n" >>>>>>>> and that narrows it down to: >>>>>>>> -> "mp3 nano" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I had a quick look at the Terms Component. >>>>>>>> I suppose it just returns term totals for the entire index and >>>>>>>> cannot >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> be >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> used with a filter or query? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> Johan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Lance Norskog >>>> goks...@gmail.com >>>> >>>> > >
